Britney Spears statue still totally disgusting

April 7th, 2006 // 154 Comments
britney-statue-back.jpg

Wondering what the Britney Spears birthing monument looks like from the back? Of course not, but here it is anyways. I wasn’t sure if this was considered safe for work or not, but I figured it’d be alright considering it’s just stone. But, uh, if all of you end up getting fired it’s not my fault. Blame Britney Spears and her horribly disgusting vagina.

Britney Spears
Britney Spears (29) Wallpapers | HD Desktop Wallpapers
Free Britney Spears Wallpapers and Britney Spears Backgrounds
Britney Spears Start Britney Spears Pictures slidshow
Britney Spears to Feature on Madonna's New Album
Rumors are circulating online that Britney Spears is set to feature on Madonna's latest album "MDNA." The news leaked on Britney's fan page Breathheavy.com, with a picture which appeared on the new album sleeve, which featured Spears' name beside the ...
Britney Spears teams with Hasbro to create new 'Twister Dance' game
Britney Spears has teamed up with Hasbro to create a new music-themed game called "Twister Dance," the toy and game giant said. "Dancing has been such an important part of my life since I was a little girl," Spears, a Grammy Award-winning recording artist ...

Comments (154)

  1. jjgm21 | April 7, 2006 at 11:01 am

    #1. woot.

    I was hoping for a little more detail in her hoo-hah, maybe some vagsticles or something.

    Reply
  2. CheekyChops | April 7, 2006 at 11:02 am

    FUCK SAKE!

    Reply
  3. brooke5301 | April 7, 2006 at 11:03 am

    OMG… MY EYES, MY EYES!!!!!!

    Reply
  4. Blaze | April 7, 2006 at 11:04 am

    Oh I’m in love!!

    She cracks me up! She doesn’t care what you or I think about her! hahah she lives her life exactly how she wants!

    So did she give birth on all fours?

    Reply
  5. tits_on_snack | April 7, 2006 at 11:04 am

    well now.

    Reply
  6. PostmanR | April 7, 2006 at 11:06 am

    Is that an alien head I see popping out of there?

    Reply
  7. honeycomb's_big_yeahyeahyeah | April 7, 2006 at 11:07 am

    This makes me wish I was dead.

    Reply
  8. oshkoshb-goshdammgosh | April 7, 2006 at 11:08 am

    The Miracle of Life! The Miracle of Life! I think the statue should be made into fountain, and the liquid of the fountain should be Vault soda, spraying out of her taut vagina and pert nipples. And we should put it in Central Park and not expect it to be vandalized or made love to by hobos.

    Reply
  9. playahater101 | April 7, 2006 at 11:09 am

    That is so fucking gross. Just disturbing. I don’t know what else to say. I am ready to throw up.

    Reply
  10. jugsgirl | April 7, 2006 at 11:12 am

    thats not brits statue. it tomkat giving birth. Congratulations its a whiny bitch.

    Reply
  11. PandoraKnight | April 7, 2006 at 11:13 am

    I will never get that image out of my head- I must share it with everyone I know. Right after I rip out my ovaries.

    Reply
  12. Warrior | April 7, 2006 at 11:13 am

    Thank goodness I don’t eat breakfast.

    Reply
  13. playahater101 | April 7, 2006 at 11:16 am

    #4, she had a c-section. So that statue makes no sense. It should be more realistic and show her screaming and crying like every other woman in the world. Except Scientologists. I hope Kaite Holes sees this and thinks being quiet isn’t going to be easy. Especially with a humn being forcing it’s way out of your vagina.

    Reply
  14. shoof | April 7, 2006 at 11:18 am

    WTF?!?!?! The “artist” should be thrown in a mental institution. First of all, who gives birth like that? Is she a dog? Well, dont answer that…..
    And what is up with her ass? I can’t even put it into words…I mean…the shape…WTF is up with that? WHAT THE FUCK!?!?!? I’m going to throw up now.

    Reply
  15. Darby | April 7, 2006 at 11:19 am

    If I was Britney Spears and they used me for a prolife statue like this without my permission I would be livid!! That statue is discusting and offensive and the ‘artist’ is only getting the work shown cause it is supposedly Britney giving birth. I’m sure she was never in this position during birth and I’m sure she took every drug available to her. I don’t know but everytime I see this monstosity I get mad.

    Reply
  16. PapaHotNuts | April 7, 2006 at 11:19 am

    I’d hit it.

    With an uppercut, then a body shot, a right hook, then come back with another uppercut.

    I wish I had Alzheimer’s so I could forget about this in a few minutes like my grandma used to do.

    Reply
  17. Vampyreska | April 7, 2006 at 11:20 am

    WTF??? Britney had a C-SECTION! The statue is factually incorrect!

    Reply
  18. Foxbase Alpha | April 7, 2006 at 11:26 am

    Did she really model for this?

    Reply
  19. imabeeatch | April 7, 2006 at 11:28 am

    Britney should pull a Tom Cruise on this artist and sue his fucking ass off. She’ll get more money that K-fag will end up taking to give to Tom Cruise to blow his itsy bitsy teeny weeny. That has got to be one of the most disgusting and disturbing things I have ever seen in my life and now it is imprinted on my brain. OMG! I think I’m going to have an aneurism.

    Reply
  20. BigJim | April 7, 2006 at 11:30 am

    So much to say about this…
    -Tom Cruise could birth that out his ass without breaking a sweat, cuz everyone knows, TOM LOVES THE COCK! (Meaning his ass is well stretched, in case you didn’t get that)
    -Rosemary called, she wants her baby back.
    -Are those Ben Wa balls I see sticking out of her ass?
    -This reminds me of a scene from the movie Aliens. Where’s Sigourney Weaver when you need her?
    -And finally… MY EYES! MY EYES!

    Reply
  21. flamarkel | April 7, 2006 at 11:31 am

    That kid will be so proud of this work of art in about, say, 13 years. Maury already has the show booked: “Teens Whose Mothers Allowed Their Births to be Hideously Recreated in Public Art Displays.”

    Reply
  22. Dr.Rokter | April 7, 2006 at 11:34 am

    There’s an old man that runs a Bookmobile across from the playground at my school. He gives us books with pictures of grownups that don’t always like to wear their clothing. Last week, he told me where babies came from, but he sure didn’t mention anything like this

    Reply
  23. mamaE | April 7, 2006 at 11:39 am

    NEWS FLASH! This artist is an idiot. Brit had an elective c-section, which means she chose to have her stomach cut open, which is far more disturbing than a baby coming out of a vagina, which is where it is supposed to. You people are wimps! most of you, and the vast majority of the billions of people on this planet, came out your mama’s vag. and many women give birth on all fours–we actually are animals you know! its sad that so many people are scared by birth–its actually can be the most empowering experience in a woman’s life. interesting how its okay to look at a woman shoving a 12-inch dildo in her poonan and a massive buttplug in her rectum, but babies being born–oh, the horror!
    you all need to get out and live a little!

    Reply
  24. Elizabeth | April 7, 2006 at 11:41 am

    this is the sickest monument statue i have ever seen. the end.

    Reply
  25. playahater101 | April 7, 2006 at 11:43 am

    #18, no the psycho, I mean artist said she had no idea he was doing this statue. Can you imagine her posing for it? And I agree. Giving birth like that is virtually impossible. You need a little bit of gravity to help you out.

    Reply
  26. Dr.Rokter | April 7, 2006 at 11:44 am

    #23

    THAT’S how I was born?! Jesus, no wonder I’m so fucked up…

    Reply
  27. hendero | April 7, 2006 at 11:46 am

    actually, I think the artist is pretty clever. He’s getting way more publicity than if he made a statue of President Bush or the Duke of New York.

    Reply
  28. Jewbacca | April 7, 2006 at 11:46 am

    It could be the artists concept of what Britney would look like having a partial birth abortion.

    Reply
  29. Becca | April 7, 2006 at 11:47 am

    Oh my God that is so hilarious beyond words.

    Reply
  30. Sweet_cheeks | April 7, 2006 at 11:48 am

    #23 and this is coming from a mother, NO ONE wants to see someone else give birth. a child’s birth is only special to the people who helped create it ( mother, father) but just because it’s special to them, does not mean everyone else want to see a pussy push out a watermelon. and yes, it is horrid, even to the people who get out and live a little.

    and btw, don’t go dissing on c-sections just because maybe you popped out your kids through your vagina. Plenty of kids come out with brain damages from oxygen loss, and a whole slew of birth defects because of a hard childbirth. just because someone has a c-section, or elects to have a c-section doesn’t make them less of a mother. they still carried the kid for 9 months and will have to go through everything all mothers go through.

    you’re not more of a mother just because you popped it out of your vagina.

    and no, i did not have elective c-section.

    Reply
  31. oshkoshb-goshdammgosh | April 7, 2006 at 11:54 am

    I don’t like watching anything give birth, or pooping, or vomiting, or eating something that is still alive. These are all natural things, and I don’t like watching them because they are gross. Ass-plugs and dildos, however, are a thing of beauty.
    And, no, I’ve never had a baby.

    Reply
  32. Redeemer | April 7, 2006 at 11:55 am

    BLUE 42, BLUE 42!!!

    SET!!! HUT,HUT…HIKE!!!

    Reply
  33. Wild Rose | April 7, 2006 at 11:55 am

    Nobody should be commenting on Britney’s participation in this monstrosity that is a product of a demented fuckwit and will be going on public display this month. I hope her lawyers manage to wipe the smirk off the pretentious son-of-a-bitch’s face, and if that doesn’t work I hope she hires some goons to break all his fingers so he is unable to produce another piece of shit like this ever again. If there’s nothing I hate more than a vacuous media-whore, it’s publicity-seeking leeches who use her name and image to promote an otherwise mediocre and offensive piece of art. And then to go even further and proclaim it celebrates birth and is a monument to the Pro-life movement. Shiiiitttt, they covered all the bases, didn’t they?

    Reply
  34. LoneWolf | April 7, 2006 at 12:01 pm

    My life is complete.

    Thanks, Superfish.

    Reply
  35. Italian Stallion | April 7, 2006 at 12:07 pm

    It looks like she is laying eggs for Easter, I still don’t see Waldo though, he hid really good this time…….

    Reply
  36. Busylittlebee | April 7, 2006 at 12:11 pm

    This looks like the work of Jeff Koons – just needs a splash of paint!

    Reply
  37. Akapee | April 7, 2006 at 12:12 pm

    I didn’t know Britney had testicles and fat short dick. That sculptor needs to take a class on imagination. Wow!!

    Reply
  38. Lala | April 7, 2006 at 12:13 pm

    #33 Her lawyers are probably sitting on this per her instructions. Then when the furor dies out, that’s when they will strike, thereby landing her further tabloid inches. Because lately, the only reason she’s in the news is because of that miserable excuse for a husband she has, so she’s got to milk this for all its worth.

    Reply
  39. whackjob | April 7, 2006 at 12:16 pm

    wondered how long it would take to see the back side of this after the original posting…now I know.

    the horror.
    the horror.

    #23 STFU. SweetCheeks nails it. (says father of 3)

    Reply
  40. em167 | April 7, 2006 at 12:18 pm

    #23 – you’re an idiot
    #30 – THANK YOU!!!! I had to have a c-section, and if anything, having a c-section takes more guts than a vaginal birth. Other women I know who had their babies naturally were up walking about the next day, whereas if you have a c-section, you’re walking doubled over for at least 1 to 2 weeks, and still hurting 6 weeks later (usually). #23, just because your babies came out of your vagina doesn’t mean those of us who had c-sections aren’t as good as mothers as you.

    As far as that statue is concerned, that artist is a moron. She never pushed, was probably never even in labor. Next time you want to spend all that time on a statue, make sure you’ve got your facts straight first, retard.

    Reply
  41. playahater101 | April 7, 2006 at 12:20 pm

    #23, I gotta agree with #30 on this. I have had 2 kids and that is just disturbing. No one wants to see a head crowning. As beautiful a thing as child birth is, at the same time it looks horribly painful and alien. One of my kids I had natural and the other was a c-section b/c the baby was breech. So don’t go and put down people who have had c-sections. Most c-sections are necessary for the health of the baby and the mother. Having your stomach cut open is no picnic either.

    Reply
  42. Kenton | April 7, 2006 at 12:27 pm

    Ok ok… What’s with the bear head?

    Reply
  43. Allie D. | April 7, 2006 at 12:27 pm

    I do not believe #23 was necessarily dissing c-sections, but trying to make a point that what the statue was trying to represent wasn’t exactly unnatural. And face it- c-sections are not natural. They are just common. I’ve had 2 of them myself and I would have overwhelmingly preferred to have natural childbirth. But that’s me. No one is “more” of a hero because they did one over the other.

    Secondly to whomever wasn’t sure that women gave birth on all fours- many women do. It is a more natural position that allows gravity to aid in the baby exiting instead of the women pushing too hard, resulting in tearing.

    Reply
  44. Ms Crackalackin | April 7, 2006 at 12:29 pm

    Just think, that’ll be Angelina Jolie in about a month! Unless, of course, she too is “too posh to push.” That baby coming out of her is not gross. What’s gross is thinking about what’s been going INTO it, not what’s coming out, IMHO.

    Reply
  45. mamadough | April 7, 2006 at 12:29 pm

    just for the hell of it, i took a totally different view of this. you ever heard how some whores do a ping-pong trick with their poonanie? well, that’s exactly what Brit is doing, except with a croquet ball. ew.

    Reply
  46. kate_possible | April 7, 2006 at 12:29 pm

    it kinda of looks like an upside-down dick

    Reply
  47. Spindoc | April 7, 2006 at 12:30 pm

    I hate to say it, but is just looks like she is constipated and dropping a HUGE load.

    Reply
  48. sweetcheeks | April 7, 2006 at 12:37 pm

    Did Spears commission this? Because I imagine there’s lots more where that came from. Britney taking a dump, Britney popping a zit, Britney shaving her armpits, etc, etc.

    I can only hope this is the first of MANY in the series.

    Reply
  49. dimestoredetective | April 7, 2006 at 12:38 pm

    Well, I remember when Britney dressed like a cute innocent schoolgirl. Now it looks like she’s had a full vaginal blowout.

    Reply
  50. Mr. Fritz | April 7, 2006 at 12:39 pm

    Ugh, this reminds me of when my dog gave birth to a litter of 6 puppies. They should use this statue as a form of birth control to warn girls of the danger of fucking a douchebag.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Name (Visible)
Email (Required, Not Visible)