Britney Spears keeps her tags on

February 5th, 2007 // 78 Comments
britney-spears-tag.jpg

Britney Spears flew from Vegas to New York last week to attend New York Fashion Week, and apparently had plans to return her dress to Wal-Mart because she was photographed with the tag still attached. Which is especially embarrassing considering it was at Fashion Week. She might as well have written ‘Gucci’ in permanent marker on a paper bag and then showed everybody her new ‘purse.’

NOTE: I can’t actually tell where the tag is from so I just assumed Wal-Mart. It’s equally possible she got it from JC Penny or a gas station.

Source


  1. steamship

    FIRST

  2. Joshingya31

    Its good to see her mirrors still dont work.

  3. Destro

    What a dumbfuck!
    What is she doing going to fashion week anyway?
    She’s an embarrassment. And a whore.

  4. White-Candy

    good god folks, for the first time in like…forever, she looks clean and fairly nice. let’s give her at least a hand for that!
    could be store tag, but could be the size tags that are in everyone’s clothes.
    who knows?…my 2 cents.

  5. I keep my tags on too! I’m practically Britney Spears!!!

    http://www.VeryLiberating.com

  6. annie

    #5: clean and fairly nice? how can you tell? we can’t even see her face! or what she’s wearing on the lower half of her body. although i assume that’d be… nothing. as usual.

  7. For I second I thought it said she kept her underwear on which was a far less believable story.

  8. icyprincess2

    You can tell it is not a size tag because it has a bar code, and to me it looks like the sales tags on the clothing at Ross or any other discount whorehouse i mean warehouse

  9. EvilPotato

    Does the bitch not understand that clothes are supposed to hang on you? — not look like they are about to burst open and let your lard spill all over the pavement and any innocent bystanders who happened to be too close.

    And #5, that sure looks like a price tag to me… it’s paper, not cloth. Size tags are cloth. C’mon, they’re not gonna sew paper inside of your clothes to tell you what size you’re wearing.

  10. well at least she’s wearing something new and clean to the gala….

  11. Don Boogie

    My vote is for TJ Maxx. By the way, I heard she also left the tag on her vagina.

  12. DancingQueen

    That’s definitely a sales tag for sure. No size tag is ever that large.

    Note to Britney: If you stop wearing see-through slut clothes then no one will see that you’re a cheap redneck fuck who returns her clothes after she stinks them up with cigarette smoke and Red Bull. Dumb bitch.

  13. Lizzle

    Slight correction, Superfish: I’m sure that if Britney really went through with the whole makeshift purse from a paper bag thing, she’d probably write “GUSHI” on the bag instead.

  14. Lowlands

    (14)Hahahaha,big chance Britney pronounces “Gucci” probably as “Gukki”.

  15. HisAngel0714

    She probably just forgot to take it off.

    Nothing funnier than those long stickers that say small, medium or large that people forget to take off though.

  16. brennreyn

    The tag definitely has a barcode on it.

    She’s classy.

  17. icyprincess2

    WAIT maybe it is target, we did see pics of her shopping there the other day

  18. mrlithium

    yea

  19. danielle

    You sure that isn’t just a permanent marking that K-Fed had her get to keep track of where she is at all times?

    I mean, that suit in the left corner looks a lot like Federline.

  20. You absolutely CAN NOT return stuff if you remove those!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  21. kitty_kat

    Maybe she just forgot to take it off. That happened to me once. Except it was a sticker. Damn embarrassing!

  22. diamondprynzez

    You know she was gonna try and return it…

    But she probably had cheeto stains all over it anyway.

  23. She loves my cock.

  24. NicotineEyePatch

    She was very strategic tucking that tag into her dress – she didn’t forget it.

    But are we even sure it’s her? Her pictures normally emit a certain stench.

  25. courtkneeyo

    it looks like tj maxx (i agree with don boogie)or marshals (same company). but maybe even target.

  26. Lowlands

    Has anybody seen my new coochie?

  27. DrDanny

    Most definitely (note the proper spelling) that’s a Marshall’s tag, and if you look closely you can see it’s already been marked down once.

  28. schack

    yo fish, can you get a zoom on that tag? we probably can figure out where it’s from.

    p.s. there is nothing wrong with tjmaxx or marshalls. in fact, it’s stupid to pay thousands of dollars for a dress whose components cost 50 cents to produce by ‘slaves’ in China. that just means we outsource some of our economy, for the sake of hoarding surpluss value, but then inflate the rates of our goods, which only decreases the value of our money.

    but, hey, well, that’s just the way it is

  29. suzy

    didnt she go shopping at target??

    lol, it looks like jcpenny

    and it’s not a dress.. it’s a slip that goes UNDER CLOTHES!

  30. magickal

    This is newsworthy? *yawn* A lot of “celebs” (I use the word loosely) keep their tags on, then they can return the item rather than ever be ~gasp!~ caught dead wearing the same thing twice.

  31. did she see herself in the mirror!?

  32. LL

    I second the “do we know this is her” note above. Not saying she wouldn’t keep the tag on a dress so she can return it, but this chick looks a little, well, slender to be Britney. The chin does look a little Britney-ish, but I won’t be convinced until I see her entire face. And of course, a note to wheover is wearing this dress: if we can practically read the tag THROUGH the dress, the dress is too sheer and you need to wear some sort of undergarment, a slip or something. I’m scared of what we’re going to see if a frontal shot ever comes out of this.

  33. -Stormy.

    #33 – Access Hollywood has the additional photos you’re looking for:
    http://www.accesshollywood.com/news/ah3871.shtml

    Too bad the photographer probably didn’t know his flash was exposing the tag at the time or he could have zoomed in on it. You’d think that every celebrity would have someone take their picture with a high-powered flash at home to test the material before heading out. Of course I’m assuming they care at all.

  34. ffordegroupie

    Yeah, this is Shitney all right — she proudly displays the discount dress tag, and if you notice, she has the back band of her bra showing above the back. Not just a little — the whole band.

    Why is it that this trashy hobag only wears a bra when she can show it off?

  35. LL

    OK, I guess it is Britney. She is a walking Glamour DON’T. Yeah, you’d think celebs would do a quick check before they go out to make sure something isn’t see-through. If it was just her tay-tas showing, I’d assume she meant to do it, but I doubt she wanted the world to see the tags inside the dress.

    She’s a dummy.

  36. PrettyBaby

    I’d lick the shoehorn they used to get her into this dress.

  37. Shanipie

    This Hollywood Misfit has never known what to wear or how to wear clothes. Seriously, i’ve never once seen her at an “event” where she was wearing something flattering or tasteful. I’m honestly baffled. I cannot fathom how this talentless skank had a career once. I mean she truely has nothing going for her. Her voice when not digitally enhanced is god awful. She has no taste, and now that Mommy and manager don’t control her every move, we can see just how retarded she is.

    She probably spilled peanut butter again on herself on the way to fashion week and got her driver to run into marshalls and pick out w/e langerie looking dress he could find. Its hard to remember the tag is still on it while your greasing yourself up to slide into it in the back of a limo.

  38. PrettyBaby

    No troller-it’s too fucking cold for shoe-horn licking.

  39. PrettyBaby

    Which is weird, because around Christmas people were falling through thin ice on the lakes. Strange winter for us.

  40. Mr. Fritz

    Right below that tag, it looks like she’s also wearing a control top girdle thing. What a piece of shit!

  41. HollyJ

    FORTY-SECOND BITCHES!!!

  42. sexybitch

    #41 Britney’s coming out with a new line of control undergarments. They’re called “Skanks”.

  43. kamihi

    I know this sort of comment has no place on The Superficial but I just feel like giving Britters a break, shes such an easy target I feel sorry for her – today.

  44. sexybitch

    #44 Who are you, and what have you done with kamihi?

  45. PrettyBaby

    #40 You are extremely boring, Troller. I get the MN references. Contribute something funny about Spears in my name at least. Cause I don’t really care about her damn tag- so think of soemthing, for me will ya, *yawn*

  46. ch474

    I hear banjos, do you hear banjos? Plus isn’t that the unmistakable stench of a Cheetos overdose? Britney, if she sang at the Grand Ole Oprey, she’d definitly take the “o” out of country.

  47. So she’s back to the dark hair thing again. Didn’t she do that about 6 months ago and go naked on the front of a magazine cover? Do you think she could be desperate to revive a dead career?

  48. Niecy

    I could understand if she forgot. I forget to take the tag off my clothes all the time. But you would think that someone in her entourage would mention it to her.

  49. Niecy

    I could understand if she forgot. I forget to take the tag off my clothes all the time. But you would think that someone in her entourage would mention it to her.

Leave A Comment