Britney Spears flew from Vegas to New York last week to attend New York Fashion Week, and apparently had plans to return her dress to Wal-Mart because she was photographed with the tag still attached. Which is especially embarrassing considering it was at Fashion Week. She might as well have written ‘Gucci’ in permanent marker on a paper bag and then showed everybody her new ‘purse.’
NOTE: I can’t actually tell where the tag is from so I just assumed Wal-Mart. It’s equally possible she got it from JC Penny or a gas station.
steamship | February 5, 2007 at 5:32 am
FIRST
RichPort | February 5, 2007 at 5:34 am
GAY
Joshingya31 | February 5, 2007 at 5:44 am
Its good to see her mirrors still dont work.
Destro | February 5, 2007 at 5:46 am
What a dumbfuck!
What is she doing going to fashion week anyway?
She’s an embarrassment. And a whore.
White-Candy | February 5, 2007 at 5:47 am
good god folks, for the first time in like…forever, she looks clean and fairly nice. let’s give her at least a hand for that!
could be store tag, but could be the size tags that are in everyone’s clothes.
who knows?…my 2 cents.
VeryLiberating.com | February 5, 2007 at 5:52 am
I keep my tags on too! I’m practically Britney Spears!!!
http://www.VeryLiberating.com
annie | February 5, 2007 at 5:54 am
#5: clean and fairly nice? how can you tell? we can’t even see her face! or what she’s wearing on the lower half of her body. although i assume that’d be… nothing. as usual.
saradevil | February 5, 2007 at 6:00 am
For I second I thought it said she kept her underwear on which was a far less believable story.
icyprincess2 | February 5, 2007 at 6:04 am
You can tell it is not a size tag because it has a bar code, and to me it looks like the sales tags on the clothing at Ross or any other discount whorehouse i mean warehouse
EvilPotato | February 5, 2007 at 6:08 am
Does the bitch not understand that clothes are supposed to hang on you? — not look like they are about to burst open and let your lard spill all over the pavement and any innocent bystanders who happened to be too close.
And #5, that sure looks like a price tag to me… it’s paper, not cloth. Size tags are cloth. C’mon, they’re not gonna sew paper inside of your clothes to tell you what size you’re wearing.
sedu | February 5, 2007 at 6:23 am
well at least she’s wearing something new and clean to the gala….
Don Boogie | February 5, 2007 at 6:33 am
My vote is for TJ Maxx. By the way, I heard she also left the tag on her vagina.
DancingQueen | February 5, 2007 at 6:35 am
That’s definitely a sales tag for sure. No size tag is ever that large.
Note to Britney: If you stop wearing see-through slut clothes then no one will see that you’re a cheap redneck fuck who returns her clothes after she stinks them up with cigarette smoke and Red Bull. Dumb bitch.
Lizzle | February 5, 2007 at 6:38 am
Slight correction, Superfish: I’m sure that if Britney really went through with the whole makeshift purse from a paper bag thing, she’d probably write “GUSHI” on the bag instead.
Lowlands | February 5, 2007 at 6:46 am
(14)Hahahaha,big chance Britney pronounces “Gucci” probably as “Gukki”.
HisAngel0714 | February 5, 2007 at 6:51 am
She probably just forgot to take it off.
Nothing funnier than those long stickers that say small, medium or large that people forget to take off though.
brennreyn | February 5, 2007 at 6:53 am
The tag definitely has a barcode on it.
She’s classy.
icyprincess2 | February 5, 2007 at 6:53 am
WAIT maybe it is target, we did see pics of her shopping there the other day
mrlithium | February 5, 2007 at 6:57 am
yea
danielle | February 5, 2007 at 7:02 am
You sure that isn’t just a permanent marking that K-Fed had her get to keep track of where she is at all times?
I mean, that suit in the left corner looks a lot like Federline.
Peter Coffin | February 5, 2007 at 7:03 am
You absolutely CAN NOT return stuff if you remove those!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
kitty_kat | February 5, 2007 at 7:06 am
Maybe she just forgot to take it off. That happened to me once. Except it was a sticker. Damn embarrassing!
diamondprynzez | February 5, 2007 at 7:07 am
You know she was gonna try and return it…
But she probably had cheeto stains all over it anyway.
F-Sucker | February 5, 2007 at 7:09 am
She loves my cock.
NicotineEyePatch | February 5, 2007 at 7:26 am
She was very strategic tucking that tag into her dress – she didn’t forget it.
But are we even sure it’s her? Her pictures normally emit a certain stench.
courtkneeyo | February 5, 2007 at 7:26 am
it looks like tj maxx (i agree with don boogie)or marshals (same company). but maybe even target.
Lowlands | February 5, 2007 at 7:30 am
Has anybody seen my new coochie?
DrDanny | February 5, 2007 at 7:46 am
Most definitely (note the proper spelling) that’s a Marshall’s tag, and if you look closely you can see it’s already been marked down once.
schack | February 5, 2007 at 7:53 am
yo fish, can you get a zoom on that tag? we probably can figure out where it’s from.
p.s. there is nothing wrong with tjmaxx or marshalls. in fact, it’s stupid to pay thousands of dollars for a dress whose components cost 50 cents to produce by ‘slaves’ in China. that just means we outsource some of our economy, for the sake of hoarding surpluss value, but then inflate the rates of our goods, which only decreases the value of our money.
but, hey, well, that’s just the way it is
suzy | February 5, 2007 at 7:59 am
didnt she go shopping at target??
lol, it looks like jcpenny
and it’s not a dress.. it’s a slip that goes UNDER CLOTHES!
magickal | February 5, 2007 at 8:04 am
This is newsworthy? *yawn* A lot of “celebs” (I use the word loosely) keep their tags on, then they can return the item rather than ever be ~gasp!~ caught dead wearing the same thing twice.
hamjachok | February 5, 2007 at 8:35 am
did she see herself in the mirror!?
LL | February 5, 2007 at 8:45 am
I second the “do we know this is her” note above. Not saying she wouldn’t keep the tag on a dress so she can return it, but this chick looks a little, well, slender to be Britney. The chin does look a little Britney-ish, but I won’t be convinced until I see her entire face. And of course, a note to wheover is wearing this dress: if we can practically read the tag THROUGH the dress, the dress is too sheer and you need to wear some sort of undergarment, a slip or something. I’m scared of what we’re going to see if a frontal shot ever comes out of this.
-Stormy. | February 5, 2007 at 9:01 am
#33 – Access Hollywood has the additional photos you’re looking for:
http://www.accesshollywood.com/news/ah3871.shtml
Too bad the photographer probably didn’t know his flash was exposing the tag at the time or he could have zoomed in on it. You’d think that every celebrity would have someone take their picture with a high-powered flash at home to test the material before heading out. Of course I’m assuming they care at all.
ffordegroupie | February 5, 2007 at 9:03 am
Yeah, this is Shitney all right — she proudly displays the discount dress tag, and if you notice, she has the back band of her bra showing above the back. Not just a little — the whole band.
Why is it that this trashy hobag only wears a bra when she can show it off?
LL | February 5, 2007 at 9:08 am
OK, I guess it is Britney. She is a walking Glamour DON’T. Yeah, you’d think celebs would do a quick check before they go out to make sure something isn’t see-through. If it was just her tay-tas showing, I’d assume she meant to do it, but I doubt she wanted the world to see the tags inside the dress.
She’s a dummy.
PrettyBaby | February 5, 2007 at 9:14 am
I’d lick the shoehorn they used to get her into this dress.
Shanipie | February 5, 2007 at 9:40 am
This Hollywood Misfit has never known what to wear or how to wear clothes. Seriously, i’ve never once seen her at an “event” where she was wearing something flattering or tasteful. I’m honestly baffled. I cannot fathom how this talentless skank had a career once. I mean she truely has nothing going for her. Her voice when not digitally enhanced is god awful. She has no taste, and now that Mommy and manager don’t control her every move, we can see just how retarded she is.
She probably spilled peanut butter again on herself on the way to fashion week and got her driver to run into marshalls and pick out w/e langerie looking dress he could find. Its hard to remember the tag is still on it while your greasing yourself up to slide into it in the back of a limo.
PrettyBaby | February 5, 2007 at 9:42 am
No troller-it’s too fucking cold for shoe-horn licking.
PrettyBaby | February 5, 2007 at 9:49 am
Which is weird, because around Christmas people were falling through thin ice on the lakes. Strange winter for us.
Mr. Fritz | February 5, 2007 at 9:54 am
Right below that tag, it looks like she’s also wearing a control top girdle thing. What a piece of shit!
HollyJ | February 5, 2007 at 9:55 am
FORTY-SECOND BITCHES!!!
sexybitch | February 5, 2007 at 10:03 am
#41 Britney’s coming out with a new line of control undergarments. They’re called “Skanks”.
kamihi | February 5, 2007 at 10:06 am
I know this sort of comment has no place on The Superficial but I just feel like giving Britters a break, shes such an easy target I feel sorry for her – today.
sexybitch | February 5, 2007 at 10:23 am
#44 Who are you, and what have you done with kamihi?
PrettyBaby | February 5, 2007 at 10:30 am
#40 You are extremely boring, Troller. I get the MN references. Contribute something funny about Spears in my name at least. Cause I don’t really care about her damn tag- so think of soemthing, for me will ya, *yawn*
ch474 | February 5, 2007 at 10:31 am
I hear banjos, do you hear banjos? Plus isn’t that the unmistakable stench of a Cheetos overdose? Britney, if she sang at the Grand Ole Oprey, she’d definitly take the “o” out of country.
Giggles | February 5, 2007 at 10:42 am
So she’s back to the dark hair thing again. Didn’t she do that about 6 months ago and go naked on the front of a magazine cover? Do you think she could be desperate to revive a dead career?
Niecy | February 5, 2007 at 10:58 am
I could understand if she forgot. I forget to take the tag off my clothes all the time. But you would think that someone in her entourage would mention it to her.
Niecy | February 5, 2007 at 10:58 am
I could understand if she forgot. I forget to take the tag off my clothes all the time. But you would think that someone in her entourage would mention it to her.