Basic Instinct 2 Uncensored Promo Reel

February 6th, 2006 // 64 Comments

Posted Under: ,
Basic Instinct (UK - BD RA/B)
Basic Instinct
Basic Instinct .
Basic Instinct Graphics Code | Basic Instinct Comments & Pictures
Basic instinct behind many consumer choices
The film centers on police detective Nick Curran (Douglas), who is investigating the brutal murder of a wealthy rock star. During the investigation Curran becomes personally involved in a torrid and intense relationship with the prime suspect, the ...
Actress undercover: Basic Instinct star Sharon Stone hides her golden locks with bright pink scarf after salon pampering
She is one of Hollywood's most famous blonde bombshells. But Sharon Stone kept her locks out of the limelight earlier today as she emerged from a Beverly Hills salon with a headscarf firmly in place. The chirpy 53-year-old star seemed in a good mood ...

Comments (64)

  1. CoJo | February 6, 2006 at 1:47 pm

    Sharon who?

    Yeah, exactly.

    Reply
  2. Populist | February 6, 2006 at 1:51 pm

    Haven’t seen the promo, but is it something like Sharon Stone seducing Michael Douglas while they live in the same retirement village? Just guessing, but foreplay could be comparing cosmetic surgery scars.

    Reply
  3. uncommonamerican | February 6, 2006 at 1:57 pm

    Looks pretty sexy. I should check with my cardiologist to make sure it’s okay to see it, though. I’ll also stop by my gastroenterologist to make sure I can survive barfing repeatedly at the site of dinosaur vagina.

    Reply
  4. LaydeeBug | February 6, 2006 at 2:02 pm

    Hold the phone! What!? Sharon Stone playing the same role? Is she producing it because I can’t see anyone in their right mind casting her in it, let alone actually creating it. GOD damn those Hollywood people! Sequels suck!!! They just gotta milk everything and beat every friggin horse til it is just guts and cartilage. Oh wait, there’s some hair left…BEAT IT!!!! Ah, Ahhhhhhhhhhh!

    Reply
  5. CoJo | February 6, 2006 at 2:03 pm

    Maybe she figures, it made her famous once…maybe it will make her famous again!

    Reply
  6. xAgonyxScenex | February 6, 2006 at 2:07 pm

    I’d bang her. She’s a good looking older woman.

    I bet she’s a whore in real life though lol

    Reply
  7. musings | February 6, 2006 at 2:08 pm

    good god – sharon is SO desperate she made a freaking porno. so not attractive. desperation is not sexy.

    Reply
  8. Magus | February 6, 2006 at 2:12 pm

    so it IS true : pornos now are more than the pizza / cable guy showing at the woman’s house to bang her brains out

    where’s Jenna Jameson ?

    wait, this is not a porno ?

    Reply
  9. Sheva | February 6, 2006 at 2:13 pm

    Well this is what happens to the older Hollywood chicks.
    Desperation becomes their trademark.

    Reply
  10. sikofdis | February 6, 2006 at 2:15 pm

    From a lot of your comments it sounds like many of you actually revere the first one? At least this one looks unabashedly trashy with no delusions or pretense of being anything else.

    Reply
  11. Drew | February 6, 2006 at 2:17 pm

    WOW that movie looks horrible. It looks like something that should be on cinemax late at night. I think the only thing that movie has going for it is all the gratuitous sex going on.

    Reply
  12. HollyJ | February 6, 2006 at 2:25 pm

    LOL@ dinosaur vagina!

    Flapalottapus

    Reply
  13. thenewjesus | February 6, 2006 at 2:26 pm

    what pisses me off is the only requirement for the guy in the lead role was that he had to bang the hell outta Sharon Stone and then be pissed off about it, which means any of us coulda been movie stars.

    Reply
  14. spamnews | February 6, 2006 at 2:34 pm

    Um, ok, I beat off to it about 20 times before the stupid tape ended. Now what? Geez that’s long. The promo reel too.

    Reply
  15. chelleann66 | February 6, 2006 at 2:38 pm

    Post #3 — I’m laughing my butt off – thanks uncommonamerican!!!

    Reply
  16. DuckBoy | February 6, 2006 at 2:57 pm

    all of you can say what you want, but Sharon Stone looks HOT! She’s definately bangin in that movie (regardless of how much plastic surgery she has had done, or how much of a whore she might be).

    Reply
  17. Tracy | February 6, 2006 at 2:58 pm

    That was awful. I want to stab my eyes out with a pen after seeing all that geriatric screwing. Whatever shred of a career Sharon Stone had before this garbage is now officially dead.

    Reply
  18. Joe Mamma | February 6, 2006 at 3:05 pm

    She is one flop away from doing bukkake, and I don’t mean noodles.

    Reply
  19. amma | February 6, 2006 at 3:06 pm

    Too bad, I liked the first Basic Instinct, it was pretty good.
    And btw, it really is dinosaur vag…Until a couple of years ago, Sharon and I lived in the same city–a small city. And in person, she is a buttah face.

    Reply
  20. Aimtrue | February 6, 2006 at 3:08 pm

    Wow Pixar does some great work! Sharron Stone’s body looks like a bag of pudding mixed with gravel, but the promo looks great! Nice work.

    Reply
  21. Whatever | February 6, 2006 at 3:10 pm

    OMG! Is that Charlotte-Goddess-Rampling in that cheap cum-feast of a movie?!?

    “what pisses me off is the only requirement for the guy in the lead role was that he had to bang the hell outta Sharon Stone and then be pissed off about it”
    New Jesus, you would be pissed off too if you had to bang old hookers for a living.

    Reply
  22. Realistic | February 6, 2006 at 3:14 pm

    What’s the big deal?! Her body parts are actually younger in this one than they were in the first movie.

    Reply
  23. ESQ | February 6, 2006 at 4:17 pm

    I finally realized why Hollywood couples end up breaking up more times than my girlfriend changes her tampon…It is difficult seeing your significant other on screen having crazy sex with someone other than yourself…When I went to college in Arizona and Sharon Stone has a house out there, (at least at one time she did) when I saw her out and about not made up, I though she looked good. Let’s hope this movie lives up to the climax it has created through this promo reel.

    Reply
  24. Miss Skyline | February 6, 2006 at 4:42 pm

    I agree with comment 18 . . .that looks like something that’d be on Cinemax or Showtime late at night.

    Holy fake breasticles, Batman!

    Reply
  25. velvetsuperstar | February 6, 2006 at 4:42 pm

    I thought Sharon Stone didn’t abide by Plastic Surgery?? I thought she condemned plastic surgery but those titties do not stay THAT round against gravity for no one!

    I may be wrong but I’m sure she was against plastic surgery… maybe fake tits are so rampant in Hollywood they’re not constitued as fake anymore…

    Reply
  26. Kimbo | February 6, 2006 at 4:55 pm

    Apparently I’m in the minority here, cuz I thought that looked fairly hot. Not GOOD, but kinda hot as a porno, which seems to be the only thing it has going for itself. -shrug-

    Reply
  27. no.name | February 6, 2006 at 5:01 pm

    That’s hot… except for the dead people. Maybe when some of you grow up you’ll like girls too.

    Reply
  28. Mary45 | February 6, 2006 at 5:11 pm

    It’s nice to see the old ho’s doing there thing too. Frankly, I really tired of Paris Hilton every damn day. P.S. not only plastic surgery but lots of make-up. I recently saw Sharon at Ago here in LA and she looked like a hag.

    Reply
  29. QuiteFrog | February 6, 2006 at 5:14 pm

    Ok, think it would have been a better porn with a guy who could actually act….but then again acting isn’t a requirement in a porno is it LOL

    Reply
  30. ohyeah | February 6, 2006 at 5:25 pm

    Kind of reminds me of the second Cruel Intentions; not as good, but more sexed-up. Definately border-line porn. Way to kill your career, Sharon. Bravo!

    Reply
  31. andrewthezeppo | February 6, 2006 at 5:26 pm

    The Crypt Keeper is back!!!

    Reply
  32. Nola | February 6, 2006 at 5:26 pm

    I hear Ron Jeremy turned this role down…

    Reply
  33. cibby | February 6, 2006 at 5:58 pm

    I know she’s old, but in that trailer, she looks amazing. Maybe it’s just the blurry quality of the video, but she looks like she just hit 30.

    Reply
  34. Redd Foxx | February 6, 2006 at 6:00 pm

    What is wrong with producers these days? The only reason anyone watched the first one was for the vag shot, which wasn’t good. Now you can hop online and see vag WHENEVER YOU WANT. Plus, who wants to see old bag vagina?

    It’s like making love to an old catcher’s mitt. And really, this reel just shows everything that people would pay to see in the movie, so why see the movie?

    Damn.

    Reply
  35. Lord_Jesus | February 6, 2006 at 6:29 pm

    Catwoman now this, yeah old Flapalottapus is trying to hard to maintain her popularity.. as would any sane guy on this planet.. i’d hit it.

    Reply
  36. derekd | February 6, 2006 at 6:34 pm

    Is it me or does this movie look likes its total shit? And as everyone has pointed out, who wants to see to grandma porn? Labia reduction anyone?

    Reply
  37. DannyJames | February 6, 2006 at 6:36 pm

    that looks like one of those movies thats on cinemax after midnight. who the fuck is sharon stone? why is she getting pounded in every other scene in that movie? since when are softcore pornos movie theatre material? what the fuck is wrong with this country? who will want to see that? god!

    Reply
  38. Lord_Jesus | February 6, 2006 at 6:37 pm

    Catwoman now this, yeah old Flapalottapus is trying to hard to maintain her popularity.. as would any sane guy on this planet.. i’d hit it.

    Reply
  39. Sweet_cheeks | February 6, 2006 at 7:01 pm

    oh god, it’s the naked grim keeper

    good lord she is hideous, that’s how lindsey will look when she’s 40 and still anorexic ( lets hope )

    Reply
  40. Shaun | February 6, 2006 at 7:11 pm

    She looks like she has been hittin’ the pipe for a couple of years. They sure used alot of “cover up” to make her look, I guess in that scene attractive.

    In my own opinion Sharon should get into producing smaller gigs. Her days of acting for looks are over.

    Reply
  41. Drew | February 6, 2006 at 7:46 pm

    http://the-feeding-tube.com/index.php?itemid=388

    There are screenshots from that promo. Looks like Stone got a set of implants and they look horrible.

    Reply
  42. funkygoldmedallions | February 6, 2006 at 8:18 pm

    As Comic Book Guy would say, “Best movie trailer ever.”

    Reply
  43. Donald Rack | February 6, 2006 at 8:27 pm

    Yeah, I thought she got implants. Shame, she had a nice set and now she just has huge bowling balls on her chest.

    Reply
  44. frangly | February 6, 2006 at 9:31 pm

    It’s too bad that Americans think women have to look fake, especially as they age. European filmmakers use women who look healthy and fit, but real, not like Barbie dolls.

    I thought Stone was pathetic in the first one. Now she’s slipped to grotesquely pathetic.

    Reply
  45. happy_bunny | February 6, 2006 at 9:46 pm

    That’s a body double if I’ve ever seen one.
    Stone kicked ass in Casino. I think she’s underrated. But then she does movies like this and it makes it very hard to defend her.
    She hasn’t worked in a while, okay? The woman’s got a mortgage. Damn!

    Reply
  46. escapevelocity | February 6, 2006 at 10:16 pm

    #39: actually, lindsay kinda looks like that now.

    Reply
  47. escapevelocity | February 6, 2006 at 10:18 pm

    #39: i take it back… sharon stone looks hotter than lindsay.

    Reply
  48. thekief4 | February 6, 2006 at 10:39 pm

    Man this movie is going to be bad. Like Pauley Shore bad.

    Reply
  49. peener | February 6, 2006 at 10:50 pm

    Here’s a more concise version, with only the nudity and gore, in slow motion and brightened for better visibility:
    http://tinyurl.com/9cltx
    This was prepared by LANDSCAPER. Spread it around!

    Reply
  50. DrDanny | February 6, 2006 at 11:41 pm

    You guys are weird. She’s outrageously fine looking almost without reference to her age.
    So what if she can’t act, and so what if she’s had some surgical enhancements along the way?

    Sheesh

    Reply
1 2

Leave a Comment

Name (Visible)
Email (Required, Not Visible)