Here’s former Danity Kane singer Aubrey O’Day on the cover of the March issue of Playboy. I like how they didn’t even try to use her real body and just added her face to a CGI model. Apparently somebody at Playboy finally realized “Why even bother taking pictures?” Which explains next month’s cover: Ariel the Little Mermaid. So buying that.
 |
Courteney Cox's Shocking Confession About Her Sex Life – Huffington Post |
 Why Was This Celebrity Booed Off This Hit TV Show? – Fox News | |
| 50 Most Scandalous Cheerleaders in Sports History – Bleacher Report | |
| Skinny Star in a Bikini Talks About Being Anorexic – Evil Beet Gossip | |
| Sasha Grey keeps doing it for the kids. – TMZ | |
| Kate Middleton Steps Out On Her Own – Lainey Gossip |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Adam Levine Signs 'Glee' Guy to New Label, Poses For Terry Richardson (PHOTOS) |
Relationship Expert on Halle Berry's Reported Move: It's About Being Selfless, Not Selfish (PHOTOS) |
Camila Alves Flashes Engagement Ring, Talks Wedding Plans (PHOTOS) |
'Madly in Love' Robert Pattinson & Kristen Stewart Hang Tight in Los Angeles |
Lady Gaga's Tattooed 'Born This Way' Costar Reveals 'Top Secret' Project with Singer |
Lindsay Lohan's Platinum Blonde Locks: Yay or Nay? (PHOTOS) |
herro | February 12, 2009 at 11:02 am
Large Cunt
Marjorie | February 12, 2009 at 11:03 am
i love kevin
JofaMang | February 12, 2009 at 11:08 am
jerking it to photoshop is pretty anti-luddite
next up, blowjob from the toaster~
Jrz | February 12, 2009 at 11:08 am
I have positively no idea who this prostitute is.
Jrz | February 12, 2009 at 11:09 am
I have positively no idea who this prostitute is.
Jrz | February 12, 2009 at 11:09 am
I have positively no idea who this prostitute is.
Dan (I mean 'Dave') | February 12, 2009 at 11:10 am
I prefer Cashews.
Photoshop Police | February 12, 2009 at 11:13 am
Celebrities (and pseudo-celebrities) often hire their own photographers and have them retouch their own photos.
I blame the celebrity for hiring an overpriced overrated photographer.
sicak videolar | February 12, 2009 at 11:14 am
soo sexyy
nananana ne | February 12, 2009 at 11:16 am
No joke, airbrushed beyond belief! She doesn’t even look like herself. O well gotta make that money…
p0nk | February 12, 2009 at 11:18 am
people who still pay for pr0n don’t deserve any better than this.
sote | February 12, 2009 at 11:26 am
who’s this slut???
Jrz | February 12, 2009 at 11:41 am
I have positively no idea why my comment came up three times when I only hit submit once.
sla | February 12, 2009 at 11:41 am
#12 — who’s this slut???
It’s Heidi Montag’s vapid identical twin.
This has to be the worst Playboy cover ever and it could single-handedly sink the Playboy enterprise (which probably wouldn’t be that difficult at this point).
I am now going to shoot myself for mentioning HM. My apologies for even bringing a mental image of her into your brain.
durr. | February 12, 2009 at 11:44 am
playboy is so over.
KayJay | February 12, 2009 at 11:45 am
Is it just me or does she look exactly like Heidi Montag in this? It’s airbrushing gone very, very wrong.
Delgo | February 12, 2009 at 11:46 am
I agree with #1-16.
FRIST!!! | February 12, 2009 at 11:49 am
That’s EXACTLY what I would look like airbrushed!!
RichPort's Ghost | February 12, 2009 at 11:52 am
Even Mike Tyson can look like this with enough time.
annie | February 12, 2009 at 11:57 am
My friend recommended me a very interesting place ^^^^MillionaireLoving. C O M^^^^ It ‘s where you have the opportunity dreaming about dating a millionaire and make it true!
E | February 12, 2009 at 11:59 am
I agree, she looks just like that horse face Heidi Montag
and why the fuck is she so beige looking?
Mr. Jones | February 12, 2009 at 12:00 pm
I can’t figure out the expression on her face. Is it her “sexy” face? Retard? Totally stoned? Help me out here.
Eliot Spitzer | February 12, 2009 at 12:02 pm
“I have positively no idea who this prostitute is.”
Sadly, that’s what I say all the time now that I can only spend $50 a pop (so to speak).
Adam | February 12, 2009 at 12:03 pm
She’s a disgusting woman a lot like Kendra Wilkinson.
ToTellTheTruth | February 12, 2009 at 12:12 pm
The ENTIRE cover was photo shopped..hell look at how shiny her fucking legs are..
anj | February 12, 2009 at 12:35 pm
What an awkward looking pose
now that was silly | February 12, 2009 at 12:38 pm
wtf is that color on her?
pic number one is not ever trying to look semi-believable-4-a-4-year-old-on-drugs!
another coment on that pic…
WHERE THE FUCK ARE HER TOES?!?!
and… I really whish I didn´t have to ask but…
WHO THE HELL IS SHE?
Liberals Swallow | February 12, 2009 at 12:41 pm
Playboy sucks. Everyone is airbrushed and about as fake as the city of L.A. Given the choice men would rather see the real thing, flaws and all. I’m sure her vag was so blown out that they needed photoshop to hide the crime tape.
lizzy | February 12, 2009 at 12:53 pm
could she be any more desperate for attention? holy shit. all she talks about is “being comfortable” with her “sexuality” and “being naked.” that’s code for i suck and no one likes me.
read the article and watch the video it’s hysterical, she is pouting her lips so hard and the look in her eyes says “i’m clueless:
http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1604909/20090211/kane__danity.jhtml
more pictures:
http://www.mtv.com/photos/?fid=1604881
Tom K | February 12, 2009 at 12:55 pm
LMAO @ 28. So true.
This women is a complete whore and a typical American blonde, pussy and breasts out on display but yet they want to be taken seriously and get offended when guys look at them. She looks like she should be on the cover of a video game magazine next to Laura Croft, because she looks so fucking fake.
Tom K | February 12, 2009 at 12:55 pm
LMAO @ 28. So true.
This women is a complete whore and a typical American blonde, pussy and breasts out on display but yet they want to be taken seriously and get offended when guys look at them. She looks like she should be on the cover of a video game magazine next to Laura Croft, because she looks so fucking fake.
Mat | February 12, 2009 at 1:10 pm
Can’t hate on the bitch for making money, but seriously…I’d rather stick my dick in a watermelon. This bitch looks like her face got hit by a mack truck.
Mr. Jones | February 12, 2009 at 1:17 pm
I have a serious question – who the hell reads Playboy anymore? It was a really, really big deal back in the 70s-80s (lots of bush, too) because there wasn’t that much pron around. But with the internets, with endless, free pron that can suit any taste, why the hell will some dude plunk down money to look at plastic women?
Arska | February 12, 2009 at 1:32 pm
I can see how implants helped her to self respect… because that’s why women get them, or so I’ve heard.
crabby old guy | February 12, 2009 at 1:37 pm
Certain things that were once interesting, clever, avant garde back in their time only now serve to illustrate just how fucking lame the have become today: Playboy, Saturday Night Live, ANY music act that was popular in the 1960′s or 70′s and still keep showing up (R. Stones, Aerosmith, Springsteen, etc.).
The only thing more fucked up than those things are the dweebs who still watch/read/listen.
Boston_Freek | February 12, 2009 at 3:26 pm
#18 LOL Frist that is a great post lol
Any new recipes??
Boston_Freek | February 12, 2009 at 3:26 pm
#18 LOL Frist that is a great post lol
Any new recipes??
Liberals Swallow | February 12, 2009 at 3:38 pm
@ 35
you are right on. Tell Playboy to bring back the 70′s bush and let the homo-metrosexuals contemplate their gayness. I like real women with real bodies. Why would anyone want to bang a photoshoped chick? just remember ladies, if you’re this vain, photoshop doesn’t make the vag smell any less fishy! ;)
Cartman | February 12, 2009 at 4:26 pm
Never heard of this chick or Danity Kane whatever that is.
Is it too much to ask that celebrities at least be a bit famous before they take off their clothes in Playboy?
Lowlands | February 12, 2009 at 4:26 pm
PFFFFFFFWW! This totally airbrushed,i can’t take this picture serious.
wtf | February 12, 2009 at 6:12 pm
wow, that does not look like her at all. she is not that skinny, and her face is not that cute.
kate | February 12, 2009 at 8:03 pm
She’s a beautiful woman.She’s so gorgeous. I love her. I saw her profile with photos and videos at ***sugarmingle. c om*** I also found her blog there.It’s said that she’s seeking for a sexy man to be the BF ? Is that ture ???
Pilatunes | February 12, 2009 at 11:07 pm
All you have to do is see the mug shots of Hugh Hefners two new concubines (the Florida twins) to realize they can do ANYTHING with digital photography now. This looks like more like that **** Lauren Conrad.
Sophia | February 12, 2009 at 11:13 pm
Do you like chubby/curvy/full-figured women or thin/skinny women? Nowadays more and more men are BBW(big beautiful women) admirers and they like to seek sexy big beauties on hot BBW dating website___Plus Meet.c om___!
gerard Vandenberg | February 12, 2009 at 11:46 pm
Uncertainity?
……………………………JUST AMERICAN SICKNESS & PRUDERY, folks
laurente | February 13, 2009 at 1:00 am
again another tranny looking so photoshopped person
ugly ugly ugly
playboy your women are ugly
the gals who hugh hangs with all look the same
big plastic tits short legs
lousy bodies
ugly bleached hair
so unsexy
no oomph
nada
laurente | February 13, 2009 at 1:00 am
again another tranny looking so photoshopped person
ugly ugly ugly
playboy your women are ugly
the gals who hugh hangs with all look the same
big plastic tits short legs
lousy bodies
ugly bleached hair
so unsexy
no oomph
nada
lawrenec4 | February 13, 2009 at 3:15 am
Wow~~~~~ she is fucking gorgeous and sexy~~she is the hottest lady at richromances.com. You guys can check more photos and information of her over there
suasan | February 13, 2009 at 3:16 am
Wow~~~~~ she is fucking gorgeous and sexy~~she is the hottest lady at richromances.com. You guys can check more photos and information of her over there
! | February 13, 2009 at 8:56 am
It really does look more like a painting than a photograph. I don’t even see the point of starting off with a photograph in the first place if you’re going to manipulate the image that much.