February 28, 2006
Matthew McConaughey doesn't like Sarah Jessica Parker
Matthew McConaughey and Sarah Jessica Parker star as sweethearts in Failure To Launch, but the actor reportedly couldn't stand Parker off-screen. Although they were acting in a breezy romantic comedy, sources on the set say filming was anything but fun. One insider says, "Matthew gets along with pretty much everyone, but he basically couldn't bear Sarah." McConaughey recently made an appearance on Oprah Winfrey's show, and when asked by Winfrey to sum-up working with Parker, the actor seemed to struggle, and eventually came up with, "Great comedic timing." He then added, "Very peculiar, too. Man, she's a very interesting woman. Yeah."
McConaughey is about as easy-going as it's humanly possible to be without banging the local pharmacist. This doesn't make Sarah sound too good. You know what does make her sound good? Sticking her nose in a wind-tunnel and using it to unlock the secrets of time-travel.
Previous Entries
» Diddy likes prostitutes» Vinnie Jones is the Juggernaut
» Janice Dickinson is gorgeous
» Britney Spears might be pregnant again
» Bruce Willis and Petra Nemcova might be dating


Comments
1. Posted by DrDanny on February 28, 2006 10:14 AM
You can tell just by looking at her that she's a high-maintenance bitch. Besides that, she's ugly and wears silly clothes. In fact, a list of her _good_ qualities would be much shorter and easier to keep up to date.
2. Posted by Zanna on February 28, 2006 10:25 AM
yea, I don't know why people keep saying she's so gorgeous. Whatever.
What I REALLY want to know is the whereabouts of LadeeBug and PapaHotNuts!!!
3. Posted by CheekyChops on February 28, 2006 10:29 AM
sarah, why the long face?
4. Posted by southtexasgal on February 28, 2006 10:34 AM
Eventhough Matthew was probably drunk or high when he said this ....
for some reason I believe she difficult to get along with.
5. Posted by southtexasgal on February 28, 2006 10:34 AM
Eventhough Matthew was probably drunk or high when he said this ....
for some reason I believe she difficult to get along with.
6. Posted by southtexasgal on February 28, 2006 10:36 AM
Eventhouhg Matt was probably drunk or high when he said this, I believe him.
She seems to be very up tight.
7. Posted by Sheva on February 28, 2006 10:37 AM
Silly clothes would be an improvement. She wears stupid clothes and thinks she's daring. She also foamed at the mouth that the federal government needed to do more and take care of her family.
This from a chick who probably spends more on stupid clothes in a month than most people spend on food in New York City.
High maintenance would be an improvement for her. She's an out and out selfish rich biyatch. Kim Catrall knows all about her and can't stand her guts either.
Now I like this dude. Repseck!
8. Posted by ESQ on February 28, 2006 10:40 AM
Jessica has a smokin' body and is a 100% natural. OK, her face is not all that, but she was awesome in Sex & the City.
I am seeing a trend here with her that she has a hard time getting along with her co-stars. Wasn't she feuding with Kim Cattrell as S&TC was ending?
9. Posted by Mazda_3s on February 28, 2006 10:41 AM
Found this new image of SJP:
http://i2.tinypic.com/ornrtd.jpg
10. Posted by bex* on February 28, 2006 10:42 AM
The only secret of time travel that would come from SJP nose is the amount of anti ageing products stuck up thier from years of a "40 a day" habit.
11. Posted by Sheva on February 28, 2006 10:44 AM
ESQ where have you been? It's old news that Cattrell couldn't stand her guts. She made Kim take off her clothes in almost like every episode of that show and also forced us to look at the undressed ugly redhead chick.
And I didn't even watch that insipid show. Living in NYC, you have more than enough stupid, selfish chicks to deal with. You don't need TV to present more of the same.
12. Posted by jugsgirl on February 28, 2006 10:45 AM
papa bug -
y don't you apply to be the new bloggers for the superfish?
i mean you both have got to be better than the current!
13. Posted by SMF121490 on February 28, 2006 10:48 AM
I have never liked Sarah Jessica Parker. She is annoying and over rated.
I wouldn't kick Matthew outta bed though. Damn that guy is so incredibly sexy.
14. Posted by Baroness on February 28, 2006 10:56 AM
I never thought I'd be actively torn between hating Matthew McConaughey's arrogant ass and hating Sarah Jessica Parker. This is exhausting!
I finally learned to spell Matthew's last name right, by the way. I just need to remember it ends in -"ghey". Ha!
15. Posted by gossipmonger on February 28, 2006 10:58 AM
Zanna asks - What I REALLY want to know is the whereabouts of LadeeBug and PapaHotNuts!!!
I say the two of them are either off together having a steamy affair, acting out all their twinkie fantasies, to name one...
OR... they are actually one and the same and that one person is on a family vacation at the moment..
Now really, seriously you two.. we miss ya! Come back to us!! I like jugsgirl's suggestion too, either (or both) should write for this blog...
16. Posted by popozao on February 28, 2006 11:06 AM
southtexasgal - even and though are two separate words... every time.
i like sjp. she's different. unconventional. at times i don't think she's attractive at all and other times she's absolutely striking. and she's classy.
17. Posted by Spindoc on February 28, 2006 11:07 AM
#3, and #9, ROFL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Oh yeah, that laugh will last me the whole day!
I can't BELIEVE that Sarah Jessica Parker would be high maintenece, I mean super thin, an actress since her teens and lives in New York?! Those stats just SCREAM "Sweet Small Town Gal"
18. Posted by Don'tPanic on February 28, 2006 11:10 AM
She is hideous, its hard to look at her.
19. Posted by amma on February 28, 2006 11:12 AM
Sex & The City had its moments...but it was basically pretty sad. The undercurrent was pretty desperate.
SJP is a skinny, skinny clotheshorse, and I think some people confuse that with being goodlooking {no offense to the naturally skinny}.
On the other hand, her face is certainly not typically beautiful, so it is somewhat a refreshing surprise that she's considered attractive.
I guess as long as one has the body of a prepubescent boy, one can make it.
20. Posted by frangly on February 28, 2006 11:14 AM
I thought SJP was supposed to be nice, and Kim Cattrall the bitch?
I dunno, SJP appeals to me. Just the fact that she hasn't had a nose job makes her pretty cool in my book.
21. Posted by billabong021 on February 28, 2006 11:20 AM
she's ruff ruff ruff!
22. Posted by smartass on February 28, 2006 11:39 AM
#9-LOL; #21-Don't insult my dogs! They are quite adorable!
She is UGLY! And she has the body, like so many of them, of a boy. I don't understand men who like sticks w/big feet & ugly faces. So many of the women celebrities are so skinny they don't even look like women any more. At least carry a NORMAL weight. Since when are curves passe?
23. Posted by thetruthhurts on February 28, 2006 11:45 AM
I adore both, and Matthew does seem really easy going, so I would love to know the truth of what went down.
But here's the BIGGEST reason I love SJP...when SATC was wrapping up Oprah had the whole cast on...and SJP had just had her baby the year before and that was all Oprah wanted to talk about, "How did you lose the weight?!?!?!" SJP said it wasn't a big deal, she's blessed genetically to be naturally thin and she's lucky enough to be able to afford both a trainer to come to her and work out AND a nanny to watch the baby while she was doing all that working out. Of course Narcissistic Evil Bitch (read as Oprah) said "Yes, but it's still YOU that has to actually do the exercises, people always say I only lost weight because of my money, but I actually had to do the work...yada, yada, yada" SJP just smiled, shrugged and said "It certainly helps to have money, in many aspects."
Anybody who comes back at O-bitch like that is ok in my book!
24. Posted by BrianMolko on February 28, 2006 11:50 AM
HORSE-FACE!!! Argh!
25. Posted by ribbit25 on February 28, 2006 11:50 AM
Given Matthew's current choice in female companionship - the fact that SJP can speak English was probably tremendously off-putting.
SJP has had a nose job - look for her at awfulplasticsurgery.com.
It's six of one and half dozen of another - he's a laid back stoner and she's prissy and high maintenance. Why would they like each other?
26. Posted by Tetsuo on February 28, 2006 11:58 AM
I still can't figure out how she stands upright. She must have some mean neck and back muscles from holding that gigantic fucking schnozz up for so long. And if that's after her nose job, her plastic surgeon should be shot. Or should that be "her vet should be shot"?
27. Posted by senin on February 28, 2006 12:01 PM
How come no one has said "I'd hit it." She's got a great bod but she looks like a greyhound. A retired from racing greyhound...that's probably what's making her bitchy.
28. Posted by senin on February 28, 2006 12:04 PM
Actually, I take that back - I've seen better looking greyhounds.
29. Posted by Spindoc on February 28, 2006 12:12 PM
OK, now that I read what she said to Oprah I like her a whole lot better. Oprah got into an argument with some woman in the audience that said that while losing weight was difficult for all, it was easier for Oprah because she had a private chef, and no kids. Oprah tried to argue that it was really difficult and the woman kept saying "I'm just saying it's easier for you, can you at least admit that?" and Oprah wouldn't. Then she ate the woman.
30. Posted by Erienne on February 28, 2006 12:16 PM
I found a beautiful pic of SJP:
http://www.capuchin-monkeys.com/pictures-images-photos/capuchin-monkeys-01.jpg
I have NEVER seen what people think is so attractive about her. I mean really. She has always been funny looking.
31. Posted by goblin queen on February 28, 2006 12:17 PM
Whoever thinks SJP hasn't had a nose job is kidding themselves. It's way slimmer now than from her "Square Pegs" days.
Here's a site that has some photos of her before & after:
http://www.awfulplasticsurgery.com/archives/000463.html
32. Posted by hahaboo6 on February 28, 2006 12:17 PM
She looks like a stupid bitch who has too many sexually transmitted diseases to even type.
33. Posted by LoneWolf on February 28, 2006 12:22 PM
If I may quote the immortal John Candy in "Uncle Buck": "....Take this quarter, go downtown, and have a rat gnaw that thing
off your face! Good day to you, Madam."
34. Posted by not-one-of-you on February 28, 2006 12:38 PM
# 33: excellent! she has bugged me for a long time now, in a sea of 'fake' she really floats nose-above the rest of the fakes.....I keep coming across rumors that MB likes the boys too, which makes their marriage a fake too????
35. Posted by Zanna on February 28, 2006 12:40 PM
Gossipmonger:
I like your thought of them being away on a steamy affair playing "hide the twinkie"...and it must be true because they are both suspiciously absent. Hmmmm.......curiouser and curiouser.
36. Posted by JC on February 28, 2006 12:44 PM
I personally watched the Oprah episode with Matthew. What is stated in this article isn't entirely true about what happened. He talked highly of Sarah during the interview. THEN, Oprah did this thing where she showed him a picture of actresses he has worked with (including Sarah, J. Lo, Sandra Bullock and Penelope) and he he was to say the first thing that comes to his mind- one sentence/thought. What was quoted here was the one blurb he said about SJP.
That being said I'm sure she she's no angel ;)
37. Posted by gogoboots on February 28, 2006 12:49 PM
Interesting. I never really liked her, she seemed narcisstic and wears silly clothes. I recall an episode of SATC where her character spent $300 on a pair of shoes, and spent $1,000 on shows over the past week, part of the reason why she couldn't afford her rent. Boo-hoo! Probably wouldn't happen to her in real life, she's too "blessed" with personal trainers and chefs to go through the "hardships" that selfish single women go through. MM is hot, I believe that he's really easygoing and yummy to boot. MMMMMM!
38. Posted by gogoboots on February 28, 2006 12:49 PM
Interesting. I never really liked her, she seemed narcisstic and wears silly clothes. I recall an episode of SATC where her character spent $300 on a pair of shoes, and spent $1,000 on shoes over the past week, part of the reason why she couldn't afford her rent. Boo-hoo! Probably wouldn't happen to her in real life, she's too "blessed" with personal trainers and chefs to go through the "hardships" that selfish single women go through. MM is hot, I believe that he's really easygoing and yummy to boot. MMMMMM!
39. Posted by seminole on February 28, 2006 12:57 PM
For the love of God, she is so not attractive--try to forget that Hollywood and the media have spent the past ten years trying to brainwash you that she is.
Her nose dwarfs the Washington Monument, and her entire face is the only thing in nature that is more ugly than my brother's foot.
Take a walk through your local college campus or shopping mall--you'll see ten more attractive women within ten minutes.
40. Posted by The Word on February 28, 2006 12:59 PM
all of you dumb broads that are slamming on SJP were probably the same people that wouldn't miss an episode of SATC if their boyfriends' dog was run over by a semi. you all probably saw Sarah's lame get-ups on the show and went out and bought those clownish outfits the next day. you all want to be her and because you're not you hate and hate. i realize this is the point of this site, but honestly...you wouldn't hate her so much if you didn't subconsciously envy her. so keep watching reruns of that terrible show and shut your mouth!
41. Posted by seminole on February 28, 2006 01:03 PM
oh, and as an actress, she has absolutely zero range. Whatever the television show or movie, she's playing the same character.
along with Jennifer Aniston, she's ridin' the romantic comedy train to oblivion.
42. Posted by Tetsuo on February 28, 2006 01:45 PM
#40 - I can't speak for the broads here, but I know the only times I ever sat through that vapid piece of shit program was when it was getting me pussy because the girlfriend fucking /loved/ that shit. And even pussy was very nearly not enough to stop me being physically ill every time I had to hear a word of that show.
43. Posted by gentleman_tickler on February 28, 2006 01:46 PM
Kim Cattrall and Sarah Jessica Parker did not get along on SEX & THE CITY, or was Sarah Jessica simply jealous of Kim? After all, Kim Cattrall was by far the best-looking for the four women. I'd also rate Kristin Davis as better-looking than Sarah Jessica Parker.
44. Posted by TheObserver on February 28, 2006 01:46 PM
I can't stand her. She had a good body
10 years ago, but time has taken it's toll.
As for her face,she was better looking when
she was younger, but basically went from
having a pony face to a horse face. I can't
her huband, Matthew Blowboy either.
45. Posted by Ashlee on February 28, 2006 02:03 PM
I think that too many people who have posted here forget why some people are famous. Some like Jessica Simpson have big boobs. Others like Sarah Jessica have some actual real acting talent. I don't care if she's skinny or has a big nose - she's a good actress and has a lot of charissma. Hollywood would be more interesting if it judged people more on talent.
46. Posted by drowningfool on February 28, 2006 02:27 PM
I think she's hot...but then again I also used to get off on the Golden Girls re-runs so maybe I'm not the best to judge...
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/6029/690/1600/sarahjess2.jpg
47. Posted by The Lazy Asian on February 28, 2006 02:34 PM
I'm sure Matthew McConaughey isn't a ball of fun either. I heard he was a prick.
48. Posted by SMF121490 on February 28, 2006 02:42 PM
The Word:
I hate Sarah Jessica Parker. I am far from a dumb broad. Probably more educated than yourself. I have never watched a single episode of Sarah's show. And therefore, have never to my knowledge purchased anything worn on that show.
Sarah Jessica is annoying and her voice is grating. She has possess no real, viable talent.
49. Posted by Sheva on February 28, 2006 02:45 PM
Sarah is not exactly a talent. She has a good publicist who keeps her in all the right places for photo ops. And she probably pays the NY Post each month to publish her doing something monthly as well. So we can see the latest developments of that gross growth on her face.
It's freakin pathetic. The bitch screams for welfare checks for her family so she can hoard more money and buy shoes and live in a multimillion dollar home in NYC.
What a piece of shit.
50. Posted by MeganHarris on February 28, 2006 02:57 PM
I love hearing when celebrities don't get along. And they're so smart about it too, they never EVER admit it. it's bad for their careers.
51. Posted by cluft on February 28, 2006 03:11 PM
I am not a fan of SJP by any means, but feel compelled to clarify what I think people are talking about as regards her comments about welfare --
Sarah has several siblings (some of whom also became actors), and they were raised by their single mom in NYC in the 70s and 80s. They got welfare when she was a kid. Sarah started acting professionally at age 9 or so (Annie) and basically helped to support her family for several years.
Again, I don't enjoy her as an actor, and wouldn't be surprised if she's a difficult person, but she acknowledges that the welfare system helped her family to survive during her childhood, and she has worked hard to get to her present level.
52. Posted by Jayne on February 28, 2006 03:13 PM
Matthew probably didn't like her because she wouldn't sleep with him.
I can imagine his ego getting flushed down the toilet. "But...Kate fucked me. Sandra Fucked me. Penelope fucked me. Come on SARAH!!!"
With that said, I find Sarah fairly overrated in the looks department..alongside Jennifer Aniston and Julia Roberts.
oh and The Word.
I've never seen an episode of SATC.
..yes.
53. Posted by HollyJ on February 28, 2006 03:14 PM
@9 LOL!! That's hilarious!
But stop insulting equines.
@31 Wow...she HAS had work...and it's STILL THAT BIG?! HOLY SHIT!! What was the square footage of that sucker to begin with?
I personally thought that Kristin Davis was THE best looking of all four women. She's gorgeous. The redhead looked like a huge ball-busting lesbian (and it turns out that she WAS).
54. Posted by not-one-of-you on February 28, 2006 03:25 PM
sheva, can you expound on sjp demanding welfare? what happened? when? i am not waiting to attack your answer, just sincerely curious as I don't think i heard about that? thanks!
55. Posted by cluft on February 28, 2006 04:09 PM
Not-one-of-you,
Scroll up to #51 for some information on SJP and welfare (not sure what Sheva has heard, but this is my understanding.)
56. Posted by not-one-of-you on February 28, 2006 04:17 PM
thanks cluft. that welfare scene then sorta seems like ancient history.....I just don't care for her cuz she is so lame, and seems desperate for the public to just love her to pieces. whatev.
57. Posted by always answer b on February 28, 2006 04:19 PM
I could never for the life of me understand the idol worship around this woman. It seems like her adoring fans never quite made the separation between her and her character on Sex and the City, who apparently wore "cute clothes" and "looked good in them." Personally, I think cute clothes are cute clothes and they would tend to look good on anything - like a clothes hanger. And a clothes hanger is a lot less offensive to the eye than Sarah Jessica Parker is.
58. Posted by Foxbase Alpha on February 28, 2006 04:49 PM
Hey, I'd too rather be stoned and naked playing my bongo drums that have to work with that snotty horseface SJP.
59. Posted by asmith on February 28, 2006 05:04 PM
I never understood the whole SJP thing either. Back in the day of Honeymoon in Vegas, I dated a guy who worshiped her (she was #1 on his 'list'). She certainly looked better then, but not that much. I had to get rid of the guy....to worship SJP!?!? Yeah, he had to go!
60. Posted by rachel on February 28, 2006 05:31 PM
I never understood how the parents of these movie stars who come from welfare families could afford acting classes for thier and going from audition to audition? Shouldn't their parents have been working? I'm not on welfare and I can't even afford to put my son in acting classes.
61. Posted by Sheva on February 28, 2006 05:41 PM
With all due respect, the criticism of this filthy greedy whore has nothing to do with unfortunate children who find their families struggling with their lives on welfare.
We're talking like a few years ago. Here's the biyatch's quote to the Washington Post. At this time I believe she was getting $3 MILLION A YEAR, more than twice the pay of her other (less dressed) co-starts. (Never her of course.)
"I'm very, very concerned about the Bush presidency. I'm worried about the kinds of cuts in domestic programs that mean something to a lot of people, including members of my family, who depend on certain things from the government," Parker blubbered to The Washington Post.
Never mind that Bush (alas) has proposed expanding Social Security and Medicare spending. Parker is a multimillionaire who earns $150,000 an episode, boasts a closet full of high-priced Manolo Blahnik shoes, and is married to an equally wealthy actor, Matthew Broderick.
If I see this whore in New York I will spit on her. She's making millions and she needs the government to spend more for her family. There's real poor people that money is needed for not for rich biyatches like her.
I hate this cunt. (Can you tell?)
62. Posted by hilary on February 28, 2006 05:43 PM
i just dont understand why every magazine talks about the BEAUTIFUL sarah jessica parker. shes so ugly and not the least bit attractive.
63. Posted by Tha-Flash on February 28, 2006 06:13 PM
Not a great story. It doesn't even say why he can't bear her.
I wonder if people realise how jealous they actually sound when they flame celebs. It's sad.
64. Posted by Sheva on February 28, 2006 06:15 PM
What are you her mother?
65. Posted by shabbyk on February 28, 2006 06:21 PM
Seriously, does ANYONE like SJP?
Another 'celebrity' who needs a reality check.
66. Posted by robot_turkey on February 28, 2006 06:38 PM
WTF? That horse didn't give much of a "comeback" to Oprah, give me a break. All she said was, "Yeah, I'm rich, that's how I got my equine physique back in shape and why I don't have to know what my kid looks like until he's 21!" Besides, Oprah can still buy and sell the slobbering cunt, so no matter how much you peons want to get back at Miss O. for being rich, black, and ubiquitous, I highly doubt SJP hurt O’s very expensive feelings.
67. Posted by Jayne on February 28, 2006 06:52 PM
#65 has a point.
68. Posted by HughJorganthethird on February 28, 2006 07:02 PM
How hard can she be to get along with? Give her a handfull of oats and let her run off her bridle for a few hours and she's happy as a clam.
69. Posted by kroft on February 28, 2006 07:12 PM
There's something about Matthew McConaughey that I've always found offputting. But I don't think he would be the kind of person who would be a bitchy diva - he's way too stoned all the time for that. SJP I could see being a bitchy diva. And no she's not attractive in any conventional sense. I've always found her more "cute" than really attractive but I have no problem with people who think she's ugly.
And Kristin Davis was BY FAR the most attractive woman on SATC. The only woman on the show with some actual curves, and a pretty face too. Kim Cat looked good for her age no doubt, but let's face it she was past her sell-by date even when the show started. It's just too bad Kristin Davis's character was so whiney and uptight on the show, which diminished her attractiveness. Yes I watched SATC sometimes, even though it was ludicrous.
And newsflash for these bitchy women who think you have to be rich to lose weight easily. DON'T EAT CHEESBURGERS AND CHEETOS ALL DAY AND GET OFF YOUR FAT ASS ONCE IN A WHILE. It's easy. In fact, people in most countries around the world don't have much of a problem with losing weight. Because they're STARVING much of the time. There's nothing more pathetic to me than some trashy "poor" woman bitching about how she can't lose weight. In most of the world, if you can afford to eat enough to get fat, you're not poor.
70. Posted by LaydeeBug on February 28, 2006 08:14 PM
Matthew is one of the hottest looking douchebag, arrogant, conceited fucks out there, but SJP is ugly, so I see why he doesn't like her. I'd SO do him, but with tape over his mouth.
71. Posted by LaydeeBug on February 28, 2006 08:16 PM
Jugs and Zanna, Awww, I've missed you too. And Sheva, great opening comment.
72. Posted by LaydeeBug on February 28, 2006 08:22 PM
Ashlee, charisma has one "s".
And guys, I got another long term temp gig where I actually have to do real work this time. But once I get my groove, I'll be back frequently and with lots of spice. Ole! Where's PAPA????
73. Posted by MonkeyPMG on February 28, 2006 08:26 PM
To Kroft (#69): You are definitely right about the way to lose weight. However, there is a strong connection between poverty and obesity due to MANY factors, but mainly because of the fact that crappy food is a lot cheaper than good food. If you're so inclined, here's a link about this issue. I know that this site has nothing to do with this kind of thing, but I think it's important to dispel the myth that you can't possibly be fat and truly poor at the same time. Interestingly, this problem is being seen more and more in poor and developing countries, not just the US.
http://www.centeronhunger.org/pdf/hungerandobesity.pdf
74. Posted by Sheva on February 28, 2006 08:41 PM
Why LadeedaBug, I was just thinking of complimenting your post but you beat me to it. Merci.
Now can we get someone with an inside story on how Jessica was such a pain in the ass that Matthew Broderick decided to take a walk to a nearby bathroom in a West Village bar and took one in the keester.
You just know that dainty boy did.
75. Posted by LaydeeBug on February 28, 2006 08:51 PM
I think she's Broderick's beard, that's what Bug thinks.
76. Posted by caf on February 28, 2006 11:51 PM
i absolutely love SATC, and can admit that SJP is not the most beautiful woman in the world, but get the a boxset, watch the series and you'll prob understand why people like her. I think shes great, and am thankful shes not some coked-up whore like other celebs. Matthew Mc is a jerk and always will be...he is such a turn-off...and he should be soo lucky to have made an appearance on SATC round season 2/3. He's 'too cool 4 school' now i reckon. Needs to be taken down a notch...im sure working with his ego was no picnic either.
77. Posted by AnnoyingPseud on March 1, 2006 01:08 AM
I can't stand this ugly nag.
Sarah Jessica SEABISCUIT and her gay hubster are both total phonies. She's a superficial, arrogant faux humble bullshit act "I'm so in touch with my poverty stricken roots, I'm practicly on welfare myself" makes me want to sell her to a horsemeat factory to land on some Frenchwoman's plate right after they watch a DVD of her horrible narcissistic puke fest show. This mare has no talent in the acting dept whatsoever! She & Jennifer Anistonopoulos both have been inflicted upon the public by relentless publicity machines. Very very minor talents inflated beyond all human comprehension to "celeb" status.
It's enough to give me vapors.
And if there's a guy less GAY than Matthew Broderick pretending to be straight [besides Tom Cruise] I'd like to know who. Beyond his love of "Broadway" [sorry to all you NYers but let's face it the only audiences for most of those shows are blue-hairs from retirement crypts and gay designers and 'artistic types' of the Mo persuasion] as a dead giveaway, there's the fact that he's been giving my Gaydar a work out since Ferris Bueller [wherein he played a kid who was OBVIOUSLY PAINFULLY going thru his teens trying to stay deep inside his closet].
Is his and Seabiscuit's marriage a sham? Pulease! Neither one of them exudes a drop of sexual magnatism, straight or gay. Sort of like Mormon NYers with expensive togs & accoutrements and a snooty little brat called "James", not Jimmy. Because you know, only proles and fat Twinkie eaters call their sons "Jim" or "Jimmy".
GAK!
And yeah, Seabiscuit's had a nose job or two from the photos. No doubt she eats iceberg lettuce, a cracker and drinks 15 gallons of water a day to maintain her svelte figure. But hey, it took a scapel to give her a nose twice the size of mine, versus three times as large as it was prior to surgery.
78. Posted by ProbablyTooOld on March 1, 2006 03:02 AM
I really don't like SJP and I think SATC was an appalling show, though I only saw one very stupid episode (the redhead has a one night stand and when the guy comes to her apartment to ask her out on a real date she tells him she doesn't know him well enough to have dinner with him--how's that for the decline of western civilization).
But we can thank SATC and the superthin, superugly SJP for helping regular women know which chicks to avoid because love for this show tells me that the person I am dealing with is an easily amused, esteem-deficient retard.
But more importantly, the show also helped the economy in untold ways.
Secretaries bought Manolo Blahniks that often cost the equivalent of two weeks pay because the show influenced them to do so and they ran up their credit cards to get them lest they be ugly and lonely without uncomfortable shoes to show how attactive they are. When they couldn't make rent because of their credit card bills, they got second jobs and raised the employment rates, causing more consumer and investor confidence in the economy.
The show convinced women that being vacuous whores is alright if he takes you to dinner and hundreds of fancy restaurants benefited. The spike in the purchase of birth control, douches, morning after pills and condoms alone kept the US from going bankrupt after 9/11.
SJP and her nasty show are capitalist heros and don't you forget it.
79. Posted by TeamLacheyRools on March 1, 2006 04:41 AM
Didnt Matt guest on an episode of SATC?!!!!!
Hes just a cash whore like the rest of 'em if he didnt like her and still agreed to do the movie - which will be crap cause she cant act except to pull that "shocked" face and hold her old lady hands up to her face. I think I hate her more than jessica simpson...which is no mean feat I can tell ya
80. Posted by dsmtoday on March 1, 2006 04:59 AM
Smokin' bod and bouncy personality from L.A. Story. Her whole career really started there.
81. Posted by mel on March 1, 2006 06:42 AM
you guys, read this:
http://www.starpulse.com/news/index.php/2006/02/20/matthew_mcconaughey_had_a_crush_on_sarah
it says he has a big crush on her. maybe that's why he was so awkward on Oprah.
82. Posted by Supercell on March 1, 2006 08:18 AM
#78 : ProbablyTooOld
I just registered to tell you that's exactly what I always thought and never had the right words to express it.
83. Posted by Baroness on March 1, 2006 09:35 AM
I always thought SATC showed women who lived exactly like bachelors, and that's why men don't like the show because they are intimidated.
Or something.
84. Posted by bakismaki on March 1, 2006 10:59 AM
She's the perfect example of a chick most women love or think is great while most men can't stand her at all or at least don't see what the big deal is about.
She was cute about 15 years ago. What is she doing as the romantic lead in this movie?
85. Posted by breezy82 on March 1, 2006 11:11 AM
Whatever, haters need to stop hating. SATC was an AWESOME show, loved every minute of it, wish it was still going on. For those of you who know anything about fashion the outfits were fabulous.. for chrissakes it introduced "regular people" to what Manolo Blahniks were, now that is pretty cool. If not for that show no one ( except those who could afford it) would know what the hell those were. Also, it gave people who lived in small towns the opportunity to know what it felt like to live fabulously in a big city, nothing wrong with fantasizing! And for the high- maintenance stuff, so what if she is? She has earned it, she is rich and she is famous why the hell wouldnt she be? If you were in her situation I bet you would be too! I dont see anyone complaining about low maintenance people, now what makes them better than high maintenance people? She is fabulous, and doesnt have to be nice to anyone except the people she cares about, and that is the great thing about being an independent free thinker, and not caring about what the masses think.
86. Posted by snark on March 1, 2006 12:12 PM
Seriously, what is with all the hatred? Why are people putting so much thought into her? She obviously wouldn't be where she is without some talent and charisma and good looks.
87. Posted by piperita on March 1, 2006 12:43 PM
#81
That doesn't sound too surprising. To me they look very much alike and aren't all actors more or less in love with themselves.
88. Posted by ribbit25 on March 1, 2006 01:02 PM
Wow! Last time I checked SATC was a TV show created for the purpose of entertainment. Lighten the fuck up...
89. Posted by reesestet on March 1, 2006 01:42 PM
Why do hot-ass men always have to be such big dickheads? Have you seen his woman, Penelope Cruz, lately? She must be good in the sack. I think Sarah is prettier. Matthew, shut your pie-hole and buy Penelope a leash and small sweater.
90. Posted by ShanDourdan on March 1, 2006 02:30 PM
Why can't people get off their high horse and stop using that bullshit claim that whenever soemeone doesn't like a celeb, their 'jealous'. To whoever said she must be talented cus she's famous or whatever. Ever heard of Paris Hilton?. Ashlee Simpson?... Being talented doesn't mean shit.
I quite enjoyed SATC though I wasn't obsessed with it. However, I've always found SJP's character one of the most annoying and conceited characters ever to grace a show. In fact I wish she'd take them ridiculously high shoes of hers and trip into a ditch never to be seen again.
I'm indifferent to SIP but I think she's butt ugly and I too don't understand the attraction. Doesn't make me jealous, fat or an ugly middle aged woman living alone with 15 cats.
91. Posted by Tracie on March 1, 2006 03:07 PM
In her prime, SJP was the true definition of a "Buttaface" (great body/unattractive face. "Everything looks good on her but her face...")
Watch her in "LA Story" and "Honeymoon In Vegas".
She's definitely had some "tweeking" in the plastic surgery department. I'll repost the proof:
http://www.awfulplasticsurgery.com/archives/000463.html
But I think both McC and SJP are seriously conceited and screwed up actors, so I'm not taking sides on this one at all.
92. Posted by bluecanary on March 1, 2006 06:11 PM
SJP is ugly as hell, but I still vote her actress I'd most like to trade places with.
Awesome clothes, husband on broadway, fabulous NYC life. And she gets all this while still being very, VERY less than attractive (but thin, which seems to trump all). Life is unfair.
I'll say this, though: after her baby was born and she came out with the hot photos in W, I liked that she said women shouldn't feel bad because if she couldn't afford a cook, a nanny, a personal trainer, and 8 hours a day to devote to getting back into shape, SHE wouldn't look this way, either. I liked that.
93. Posted by Sheva on March 1, 2006 06:25 PM
I found some heroes on this thread. The amazing and mighty AnnoyingPseud and the pointed thought of ProbablyTooOld.
Some of you pathetic empty vacuous bitches though, up against the wall.
But before you do, make sure to get those great designer shoes on sale before your bankruptcy court appearance.
94. Posted by Xanthia on March 2, 2006 05:44 PM
Yo. Jane. I know Matthew. Not that we speak regularly or anything, but let me ease your mind. He is a nice guy - he is a laid back, "whatever makes you happy - do it" kind of person...........
I sincerely doubt he ever thought about getting near THAT.
95. Posted by AnnoyingPseud on March 4, 2006 04:12 AM
#78, ProbablyTooOld, brilliant and insightful commentary on the shite called SATC. Revolting, narcissistic and filled with pathological greed. Hey, I love shoes and handbags [oh my dog, do I love HANDBAGS!! I want a Fendi Spy and every single Ferragamo out there...but hey, I didn't win that $267M Lotto so it's back to Nordstrom Rack for me!]. But there's nothing to trumpet about loving crap like overpriced shos, clothes and bullshit. I'm all for women's sexual empowerment but there's nothing whatsoever powerful about hunting for men [with big bucks] as a full time hobby and sleeping with anyone who comes along while your baited lines is out there waiting for the "big fish" to come along. It is and was a show which demonstrated how incredibly bankrupt bitches in Manhattan can be - well dressed or not. And I sure as hell knew about Manolo Blahnik before the show, because I've been reading Vogue and Harper's Bazaar and every other mag for years. So there.
96. Posted by sarakai on March 4, 2006 06:11 AM
I don't see how anyone can find SJP attractive in the slightest. I've seen drag queens that look more feminine then her, and they dress better too. In fact, as I write this I'm becoming increasingly convinced that she is in fact a man.
97. Posted by Swordman on March 6, 2006 10:37 AM
She's the perfect butter-face, as in "nice body, but her face!"