February 16, 2006
Mary-Kate & Ashley Olsen model for Badgley Mischka

Here are Mary-Kate & Ashley Olsen, wandering through the halls of the Overlook Hotel. They're supposedly modeling something. Perhaps anorexia. Definitely not breast implants. Remember that big countdown to their eighteenth birthday, when everyone thought they were going to be so gorgeous? And then the birthday came and the world collectively scratched their heads, because screwing them seems about as pleasant as screwing the vacuum cleaner. At least the vacuum doesn't complain when you use a marker to draw boobs on it.
Previous Entries
» Madonna treated for hernia» Tom Cruise on Oprah - As It Should've Been
» Eva Green is the new Bond girl
» Paris Hilton hits on Prince
» Willie Nelson Releases Gay Cowboy Song


Comments
1. Posted by Georgia on February 16, 2006 03:16 PM
I don't get these girls. They are just rich. I see better looking girls walking down the street.
And they are defenitely not sexy, unless you are a pedophile of course.
2. Posted by Nikk The Templar on February 16, 2006 03:17 PM
I said....Goddamn, those are some seriously airbrushed hobbits.
3. Posted by Juliette on February 16, 2006 03:21 PM
I never understood people who say they are pretty or hot. They have about as much appeal as a broomstick. On top of that they have zero personality and always look like spoiled bitches.
And I hate that stupid duck smile they always do.
4. Posted by Jacq on February 16, 2006 03:28 PM
The best comparison to make between the Olsens and a vaccum cleaner is that they all suck at life
5. Posted by suzy on February 16, 2006 03:28 PM
their dresses are ok, but their makeup is HIDEOUS!!!! They're clothing line has better clothes than they actually wear... that's sad when a 5 year old can dress better than you
6. Posted by Zanna on February 16, 2006 03:28 PM
Get a load of the picture in the url: Heyyyy, this is a nice big mirror to do lines on!!!!! I've seen healthier hair on homeless people coming out of a dumpster.
http://www.olsen-twins-news.com/newsimages/feb2006/mary-kate-ashley-olsen-badgley-mischka-ad-hq-01.jpg
7. Posted by Binky on February 16, 2006 03:30 PM
From their facial expressions - it looks like they'll both have to put 'bodily functions' on their wish list for next Christmas.
8. Posted by krahe on February 16, 2006 03:31 PM
*Are* we certain that they're still actually, you know, alive?
9. Posted by outfoxed on February 16, 2006 03:32 PM
#3...I don't know about that, broomsticks are pretty sexy.
10. Posted by Zanna on February 16, 2006 03:33 PM
You think the makeup is bad on that, Suzy? Check this out:
http://www.olsen-twins-news.com/newsimages/feb2006/mary-kate-ashley-olsen-badgley-mischka-show-feb-7-2006-05.jpg
It reminds me of silly putty. Tell me when you see this picture you don't want to press her face on some newspaper.
11. Posted by LaydeeBug on February 16, 2006 03:34 PM
Great dresses, but why are there two five-year-olds wearing them? Bedknobs and Broomsticks comes to mind.
12. Posted by Devil Is Chrome on February 16, 2006 03:38 PM
#10 pictures - She's starting to look like the Lioness of New York...
whawhaawha!
I wish it were possible to fast forward thirty years.
13. Posted by tits_on_snack on February 16, 2006 03:41 PM
http://searchviews.com/archives/shining_twins.jpg
14. Posted by pookiedoo on February 16, 2006 03:42 PM
They look like a Buy-One-Get-One-Free special at Heidi Fleiss's House Of Whores!
15. Posted by SAPPY14 on February 16, 2006 03:45 PM
is it bad that i think they look really pretty? my only problem is marykate's eyebrows, they looks like melted crayons.
#13 probably the funniest thing i've ever seen i love it
16. Posted by SAPPY14 on February 16, 2006 03:46 PM
also, why does ashley have two purses??
17. Posted by xavierout on February 16, 2006 03:48 PM
They're creepy now, they've been creepy for years and they'll be creepy forevermore. The vacancy of the expression that is always on their faces makes Paris Hilton look contemplative in comparison. Did I mention that they're really creepy? I did? Well they are.
18. Posted by Havet on February 16, 2006 03:51 PM
I don't care about the twins much... I just really like those dresses!! esp the ones in #10.
the twins just look wierd... But well, even when they were in 'full house' i never thought they were that cute.
and how can u hav such HUGE eyes?! it doesnt look normal!
19. Posted by elvindeath on February 16, 2006 03:52 PM
I'd fuck 'em.
20. Posted by LaydeeBug on February 16, 2006 03:53 PM
#16, ones a purse the other is her big assed bumble bee sunglasses.
21. Posted by PinkRose on February 16, 2006 03:53 PM
That picture reminds me of that scene from The Shining, where the twins are at the end of the hallway calling out to the son.
Creepy..creepy...creepy.
22. Posted by Spindoc on February 16, 2006 03:58 PM
Who knew Olive Oil had a twin sister? Anyway, Superficial guy, or whoever it is who writes this blog...I just gotta say that your comment about the vacuum not complaining when you draw boobs on it was just about the funniest damn thing I've read. Thanks for that "Almost gonna pee" feeling.
23. Posted by baltogirl on February 16, 2006 04:05 PM
which one is which?
24. Posted by PostAcidYouth on February 16, 2006 04:08 PM
I dunno, the Olsen on the left is quite a pretty little thing. I don't care for the twins much, but they're not ugly
25. Posted by MeganHarris on February 16, 2006 04:09 PM
I think they are just great.
Mary-kate is the red-head.
26. Posted by suzy on February 16, 2006 04:19 PM
Posted by Zanna on February 16, 2006 03:28 PM
"Get a load of the picture in the url: Heyyyy, this is a nice big mirror to do lines on!!!!! I've seen healthier hair on homeless people coming out of a dumpster.
http://www.olsen-twins-news.com/newsimages/feb2006/mary-kate-ashley-olsen-badgley-mischka-ad-hq-01.jpg"
IS THAT A NIP SLIP I SEE IN THE MIRROR???????
27. Posted by memichelle77 on February 16, 2006 04:22 PM
I scanned the picture for a nip slip, and i don't think there is one. however, even more shocking is that when you look at Ashley from the side (not at her reflection), it actually looks like she has boobs. what the hell?
28. Posted by LaydeeBug on February 16, 2006 04:27 PM
26 & 27, it's the strapless, push-up bra she's wearing. They are made for boob-challenged people like her (and me).
29. Posted by em167 on February 16, 2006 04:30 PM
Psh, I think they look great. Mary-Kate looks healthier than she has in a while, and Ashley is just beautiful. I mean, I think this site is hilarious, but, come on, there's no story here. Post some more stuff on Tom Nutso Cruise
30. Posted by ShanDourdan on February 16, 2006 04:33 PM
Forget just boobs, it actually looks like she may actually be female, she's got an arse too?. I guess that must be real since most photographers try to airbrush that stuff *out* not in...
I love the dresses, I think they're stunning and dare I say it, I actually think Ashley looks good in the first one. But I just wish she'd quit with the 'deer caught in a head light with exceedingly pouty lips' look. Ecch.
31. Posted by playahater101 on February 16, 2006 04:35 PM
I think they look pretty good, too. The makeup's a little too much. They look kinda like those little girls that mothers put in beauty pageants when they are like 5 years old.
#1, "I don't get these girls. They are just rich. I see better looking girls walking down the street"
What's the difference between them and any other celeb? Paris isn't any better. All any of them are is rich.
32. Posted by suzy on February 16, 2006 04:36 PM
eh, you never know.. it woulda been funny i was only shocked cuz i know they dont have boobies lol....
still... funny
33. Posted by Phil on February 16, 2006 04:36 PM
"Hello Danny. Come and play with us. Come and play with us, Danny. Forever... and ever... and ever.
34. Posted by maiira on February 16, 2006 04:45 PM
AHHHHH!!
.....
Holy christ, for a second there I thought I was watching a twisted version of The Shining. Or some weird Japanese horror flick. They seriously look like they're going to reach through my screen and pull me into some dark underworld. And then they would turn their heads slowly to look at me and whisper "you are one of usssssss."
35. Posted by J. Te on February 16, 2006 04:48 PM
Was that picture, by any chance, inspired by THIS picture: http://www.archiviokubrick.it/film/shining/foto/twins02.jpg
36. Posted by tits_on_snack on February 16, 2006 04:56 PM
i posted the Shining picture first, so, neener neener.
Anyway these two have always weirded me out. When they were little kids, their faces looked like those good luck troll dolls.
37. Posted by cibby on February 16, 2006 04:57 PM
I don't like the current style of overloading the dark makeup on the eyes.
When that first came out in the magazines, I remember thinking 'why would you want to make women look like ghouls?'
Now, it's all over the place, and it's revolting.
38. Posted by TheRedInk on February 16, 2006 05:10 PM
History's Mysteries: Haunted Hotels
39. Posted by dimestoredetective on February 16, 2006 05:11 PM
I love it when celebs complain about how hard it is to be in the limelight etc. att the time. When, after one semester at college crushes them, sends them packing. And these bitches don't have to worry about rent, and food as we all did. I really feel for these girls. It's so hard to be filthy rich and gnomish. Gnome gnome gnome.
40. Posted by alicat on February 16, 2006 05:15 PM
I'm starting to wonder what is wrong with their mouths. Has anyone seen them smile since Full House? Did they catch some horrible disease that transformed their teeth and tongues into something only Beetlejuice would touch? Or Stavros...which isn't saying much since he has moved on to Paris.
41. Posted by HughJorganthethird on February 16, 2006 05:19 PM
This fucking picture is freaking me out. It looks like a scene shot from "The Others 2"
42. Posted by Lavis on February 16, 2006 05:26 PM
Remeber the movie "The Shining" and those evil twins that kept showing up in the hallways of the haunted hotel? Yeah, scary!
43. Posted by eatyourfeedback on February 16, 2006 05:37 PM
Good God, the likeness to the Overlook Hotel is amazing! At any moment they will be saying "Come play with us Danny...forever and ever and ever!" All they need are matching dresses.
I've never found anything particularly attractive about the Olsen twins and, for that matter, I don't know any men who find them to be anything extraordinary either. There is something distinctly monkey-ish about their facial features.
44. Posted by SMF121490 on February 16, 2006 05:42 PM
21 That is exactly what I thought when I first saw the photo. REDRUM REDRUM
45. Posted by downshine on February 16, 2006 05:47 PM
the duck smile makes me want to slit my wrists! and since when did 5foot2inch pre-pubescent girls become models?
46. Posted by HollyJ on February 16, 2006 05:53 PM
I hate to say it...but I think they look very pretty in this particular shot. The blonde has the prettiest face but her hair sucks. Dark hair is better.
I haven't seen them look this "feminine" in...well...ever... Despite the complete titlessness.
47. Posted by kuennen sux on February 16, 2006 06:06 PM
Are these chicks happy?
48. Posted by MP$40 on February 16, 2006 06:26 PM
They look like coked out prom whores!
49. Posted by manunited on February 16, 2006 06:26 PM
One monkey carries 2 handbags...one with 12 candy bars inside... the other bag to throw up into once candy bars have been inhaled.
50. Posted by MP$40 on February 16, 2006 06:26 PM
Courtney Love's secret love twins! ROFL...
51. Posted by Jayne on February 16, 2006 06:27 PM
How awful.
Just...gah..
and that picture from #10..
wow.
52. Posted by ~S.Starr~ on February 16, 2006 06:30 PM
OMG...you people are retarded. It is a photoshoot...there make-up and hair was done for them (so knocking their make-up and hair is pointless).
I am starting to get the impression that a lot of you just come on here to bash celebrities...regardless of who it is or what they have done. Given it is a celebrity bashing website...But HEY...give credit where credit is deserved!! THEY LOOK BEAUTIFUL!! Always have and always will...
~S
53. Posted by hafaball on February 16, 2006 06:39 PM
Great, now every fanatasy I have of them will involve Jack Nicholson putting an axe in my ass...thanks Superficial! Very funny though hehe
54. Posted by Go Sip on February 16, 2006 06:50 PM
I have been drawing these two "stick figures" since kindergarten.
55. Posted by HughJorganthethird on February 16, 2006 07:01 PM
Yeah S. Starr WE'RE retarded. Actually I have to give you credit, your post is the most unintentionaly hilarious thing I have ever read. I don't think I've ever come across anything or anyone so devoid of irony.
It's the fucking Olsen twins you moron! They get bashed becuase they are talentless, souless, corporate robots who's entire purpose in life is to take money from idiots like yourself. Give credit were it is deserved? For what? Walking with clothes on?
You better shut off the computer now and run along, I think I just heard the short bus pull up outside your place.
56. Posted by Zanna on February 16, 2006 07:27 PM
S. Starr, honey...we got some 'esplainin to do.....this site IS about bashing celebrities. We come here and we rant and we rave because it's an outlet and it's FUN. Here is a nice site for you to enjoy: http://www.babyanimalz.com/index.htm
57. Posted by spamnews on February 16, 2006 07:34 PM
Excuse the fuck out of me but all you haters bashing that picture would probably come in your pants if those two were walking down to your hotel room lookin' like that.
58. Posted by Ing on February 16, 2006 07:43 PM
I think these girls are smarter then they seem..they have made money for themselves from a young age and have ALWAYS worked at something or other. Unlike useless morons like Paris who were born into money..but dam they have 300mil in the bank they cld at least fake a smile..
They have always been CUTE bt they try too hard to look grown up and sexy. That stupid pout of Ashleys and duck smile of MaryKates is sooo old already..just smile goddammit is it so hard!
I dont think they look so alike now they are becoming more and more different with age..MaryKate is a lot smaller and has a way different face shape and thinner lips..
59. Posted by Manderoni on February 16, 2006 07:47 PM
#56 - Zanna....I agree with the fact that we all come here to bash on celebs...believe me, I love thesuperficial. BUT you just made my day with the baby animal website!! HA!! I love it!! Now I have a new site to look at everyday....hehe, so cute!! I'm a dork, I know...
60. Posted by amma on February 16, 2006 07:57 PM
...I agree, the one on the left has a prettier face, but the dark hair looks better. Is there any way to meld them into one regular size person?
I totally think they are cute...and should be taken that way. Glamour vamps they aint, trying to market them that way is doomed.
At least we don't see them falling down drunk in public or on sex vids. They made their money working and have tried to further their education.
Definitely heads above some of their mini-dog weilding peers.
61. Posted by The Devil on February 16, 2006 07:57 PM
Beauty is self-evident to the beholder and these two are beautiful, IMHO.
62. Posted by JediKnight437 on February 16, 2006 08:07 PM
Can someone say 'Jean-Bennet Ramsey" ? Ugh. Someone order them a double burger, STAT!
63. Posted by Binky on February 16, 2006 08:08 PM
I agree - # 56 Thanks for the link.
A walk in the park...
64. Posted by Binky on February 16, 2006 08:20 PM
...well at least those animals get your mind off those new Abu Ghraib pix and these Dawn of the Dead pix for a while..
65. Posted by Binky on February 16, 2006 08:28 PM
and no I'm not actually that crazy guy on Survivor - but tanx for asking x
66. Posted by M@ce on February 16, 2006 08:32 PM
I thought I saw Mary-Kate and Ashley at my doctor's office today. Boy was I embarrassed when the police arrived and pried my naked thrusting ass off of the doctor's skeleton and his coat rack. Still, that coat rack sort of had it coming...it wanted it.
67. Posted by a concerned fan on February 16, 2006 08:48 PM
They are gremlins!! Check it out:
http://www.robotjohnny.com/2005/06/09/brightlight/
68. Posted by Toby on February 16, 2006 08:51 PM
Not an awesome picture but Mary-Kate looks better than Ashley. Why is she always pouting like that?!? Not sexy. #56 Thanks for the website!! Hilarious!
69. Posted by Kg on February 16, 2006 09:06 PM
maybe if you taped them together...
70. Posted by ESQ on February 16, 2006 09:16 PM
Twins: Look Mommy we went in your closet and tried on your dresses and put on your make-up, don't we look beautiful?
Mom: It looks nice girls, but I think you are a little too young to be dressing up in Mommys things. You don't want to look like that Paris Hilton tramp, now do you? Go get dressed back in your clothes and wipe off that make-up.
71. Posted by LaydeeBug on February 16, 2006 09:24 PM
#56 - Awwwwwwwwwww!
72. Posted by Dash Riprock on February 16, 2006 10:06 PM
You'd have to sleep with both of these midgets (as opposed to sleeping with just one of them) to have anything resembling a sexual experience. But I'd still end up unsatsisfied, longing for something more. Sigh.
73. Posted by TaiTai on February 16, 2006 10:20 PM
Um, does anybody else notice that the Lemur on the fifth row on #56's link looks exactly like one of the twins?
74. Posted by the beast on February 16, 2006 11:17 PM
i don't know. i think they look beautiful. and besides...when's the last time you saw a model that DIDN'T look vacant or for that matter a chick who didn't wish she looked as slender as they did. they're no nicole richie skeleton but they're also no fat fuck britney spears either.
75. Posted by Fatty Boom-Batty on February 16, 2006 11:49 PM
I just know that Uncle Joey is masterbating to these pictures.
76. Posted by Dee on February 17, 2006 12:16 AM
I never got what all the hype over these two was about, i guess because there are two of them. They look like little girls who got loose in someones closet most of the time. They don't come off as very interesting or bright either.
77. Posted by Aimtrue on February 17, 2006 12:21 AM
Ok-I'ld bang them-but only if it was a threesome.
78. Posted by ~S.Starr~ on February 17, 2006 12:48 AM
HughJorganthethird:
You know what...you are right. Hell, you have even inspired me to join the bashing! Ummm, where should I start....OMG, they are joint CEO's of a multi-million dollar corporation...what morons! And they are worth a reported $150 million dollars each...stupid bitches! They scored a Badgly Mischka modeling contract that probably made them more money than most people make in 5 years time...what fools!!!!
And speaking of being a dumbass...Ashly is the queen od morons...what with her being a college student at well known New York University...god will this girl ever grow up!?!?!?
Seriously people...I think it is time we go back to bashing the real morons of the entertainment industry...Like Paris Hilton and Nicole Ritchie...
79. Posted by TheLusciousDeluxe on February 17, 2006 01:16 AM
43 - Yeah, LOL, gotta love that Overlook reference. The twins in The Shining, LOL! So funny!
80. Posted by flamarkel on February 17, 2006 01:32 AM
You all are so harsh! I think they're beautiful. Their eyes are the most captivating I've seen in some time. I could stare into those eyes for days. I'd do them in the bushes any day! Me? I'm just an ordinary raccoon.
81. Posted by Bo_Smith on February 17, 2006 02:08 AM
Oh come on they look good. And the clothing is like aimed at little girls isn't it?
82. Posted by eyespy27 on February 17, 2006 02:48 AM
i thought jon benet ramsey was dead. and now there are two of them.
83. Posted by Rochford on February 17, 2006 02:50 AM
Hardly, spamnews. I'm a woman that likes girls just as much as any red-blooded American boy but I'd never touch those two.
84. Posted by billabong021 on February 17, 2006 03:28 AM
Looks like dakota fanning and natalie portman have finally got sme competition.
85. Posted by christee on February 17, 2006 03:46 AM
damn...is it halloween already?
just because they have made oodles of money from sitcoms and children's clothes, it doesn't mean they have earned it through talent. and what they earned from "full house," or any of their pre-18 acting jobs, for that matter, could be justified with "oh, but actors work such long hours." granted, most of the shows they've been on aren't marketed to age groups that actually notice any acting ability. they are just a novelty act that has gotten very lucky, and stayed very lucky. a friend of mine used to say "wait until they hit 20...you know one of them at least is bound to make a porn flick!" and it's probably for the best they don't hang w/that hooker, paris. (well, she is an example in how NOT to do porn, so take note, olsens).
86. Posted by Hara on February 17, 2006 03:47 AM
First off, the main reason they look so freakish is because this photo has been airbrushed to the point where it might as well be a watercolor. The gremlin picture someone posted is a lot closer to 'real'. The original shot, not the green one.... I guess.
And second, could we PLEASE stop comparing the girls to those twins from the Shining? That is so uncalled for an insulting. The Shining girls are fat cows next to the Olsens. And they have bigger boobs. (look closely)
87. Posted by christee on February 17, 2006 03:47 AM
*that was supposed to be "could not be justified." oops*
88. Posted by Evangelia on February 17, 2006 04:08 AM
I honestly believe that they have no teeth. The Olson twins' teeth are like Sasquatch or the Loch Ness monster - mythical rumors. I can understand it in Mary-Kate's case; throwing up 7 times a day can cause your enamel to wear away. But what excuse does Ashley have? Maybe Hilary Duff can lend them some of her toothage.
89. Posted by Lavinia the Vainglorious on February 17, 2006 08:12 AM
Hey I have Sims that look like this. But they are vampires...and they dress much much better and I would save them from a kitchen fire before lifting a finger to help any Olsen in mortal peril.
90. Posted by TeamLacheyRools on February 17, 2006 08:37 AM
So fucking airburshed, everyone knows they dont have any tits. oh and they sure are ugly. I thought models were meant to be good looking?
91. Posted by A Nobody on February 17, 2006 09:06 AM
Woah, they're still alive? After 3 months of hearing nothing from them, I thought they died of starvation.
Why won't they just leave already. They were never talented, don't even mention attractive. They were the ones who influenced hundreds of young girls to start throwing up. Why the hell are they even rich? Bimbo body wreckers.
92. Posted by popcornsuite on February 17, 2006 11:52 AM
Quick, someone get the garlic and the stakes.
93. Posted by Kelly617 on February 17, 2006 12:01 PM
Honestly? I think Ashley looks really pretty. Even in the other one that was posted with the mirror. She's got a nice face shape and her body looks like it has some curves.
MK just looks bad and frazzled.
94. Posted by funnygator on February 17, 2006 12:54 PM
Smart? Yes. Rich? HELL yes. Come in my pants if they're in my hotel room? Repeatedly. but, come on, Ashley's obvioulsy too young to know that whoever did her makeup is a huge 'Bride of Frankenstein' fan... and this was an homage...
95. Posted by archyros on February 17, 2006 01:52 PM
#92, that's the first thing I thought of. They don't go out during the day anymore, do they?
Thought so.
Haven't been seen eating solid food?
Thought so.
Never show their teeth?
Thought not.
96. Posted by Jazsawa on February 17, 2006 03:00 PM
http://www.slipknot-metal.com/gallery/videostills/spititout/images/spiitout-05.jpg
creepy
97. Posted by Maeve97 on February 17, 2006 03:26 PM
I think they look awesome. They have been working since they were babies. People should give them more credit.
98. Posted by Moksha on February 17, 2006 04:02 PM
Fat cows...
99. Posted by kuennen sux on February 17, 2006 04:36 PM
Zanna, can I enjoy the baby animals AND the celebrity bashing??
100. Posted by bluecanary on February 17, 2006 04:41 PM
The blonde one looks like a blow-up doll, should be good spank material for perverts. Love the blue dress on the other one, though. I don't keep up with them enough to remember their names, I just go with Hobo girl and non-hobo sister. but without their street attire, I can't remember which is which.
101. Posted by HughJorganthethird on February 17, 2006 06:12 PM
Your right S Starr. They are both geniuses. I'm sure they handle the day to day routine of there various business interests. In fact I bet they both get up and give lenghty speeches concerning shareholders dividends and profit margins etc. at the anuual meetings. College eh? You know what they were majoring in? Acting! Wow what a stretch! Fucking brilliant! Never mind the fact that they have both dropped out. And we all know how smart and talented you have to be to MODEL. Being rich becuase you were a cute kid doesn't make you talented or smart. And like I said before the only reason these two trolls are wealthy is because of dumb fucks like yourself.
102. Posted by hermanita on February 17, 2006 06:44 PM
The brunette (yeah I'm bad with names too) is just much prettier then her sister. If she's the one who was anorexic, then she doesn't look nearly as bad as she used to.
#3 Juliette, I never heard one of them say they think they're hot. And I don't think they do. They seem very insecure.
103. Posted by Maeve97 on February 17, 2006 07:58 PM
Zanna/#56: thanks for that baby animals website. i now have a baby elephant as my screen saver.
104. Posted by monkeyballs on February 17, 2006 09:02 PM
Whoever said that about the weird duck lip smile?
THANK YOU!!! OMG I ****HATE***** THAT WEIRD THING one of them does when she smiles. It's like The Constipated Look.
And just while I'm on the subject, I can't stand how Renee Zellwhatever does that pursed lips thing when she's just sitting there. Like, WTF is that? Who DOES that? No one. It's so distracting and stupid and I want to smack her every time she does it.
Ok thanks for letting me get that out.
105. Posted by The_Photoman on February 17, 2006 11:24 PM
These 2 would be fun to work with....got some sweet sci-fi concepts in mind.
106. Posted by knittykitty on February 18, 2006 01:59 AM
Redrum! Redrum!!!!
This is totally the twins from The Shining. Everyone who doesn't agree is too young. Truly.
107. Posted by Erienne on February 18, 2006 02:40 AM
This is the first time I've been to this site, and I am close to tears. You people are bloody hilarious.
Ashley is definetely the hotter of the two, but I can't say I disagree with the gnome/hobbit/gremlin comments by everyone.
And Evangelia, you so right about Hilary Duff. For anyone who hasn't seen the horror of Duff's smile: http://www.thesuperficial.com/archives/2006/02/10/hilary_duff_has_a_pretty_smile_1.html
Thanks for making my day a lot better everyone.
108. Posted by A Nobody on February 18, 2006 08:32 AM
Remember, just because they acted since they were born doesn't make them talented in any way. Have you seen fullhouse? Most people just didn't judge because they were so little, but all they did was basically read lines emotionlessly. What's so special about them? Just another overrated Paris Hilton wannabes.
109. Posted by Aliceis_obsessed on February 18, 2006 08:03 PM
no one ever said they were talented, but i don't think they or ugly little monsters everyone makes them out to be, the dresses are beautiful and if they weren't modeling it some other over hyped coked out teen queen would be
110. Posted by susie-q on February 18, 2006 08:42 PM
Those are some scary bitches. The hair is out of control - could that have really been the look they were going for? And their brains have the appearance of being, well, devoid of function.
They do pull off the red lipstick better than Anne Hathaway does.
111. Posted by gogoboots on February 18, 2006 10:14 PM
I think I preferred them when they were babies, now they look like anorexic zombies trying to take over our minds with their overdone eye make-up and all growed up clothes. Ugh, let me go hide under my bed before the twins decide to eat my brains out and puke him up again!
112. Posted by jon on February 19, 2006 10:07 AM
Strange people. I'd fucking hit them. Both.
113. Posted by A Nobody on February 20, 2006 12:44 AM
You'd hit everybody.
114. Posted by christee on February 20, 2006 02:24 AM
maybe this is really a poster for "lord of the rings-revenge of the hobbits." yeah..that makes sense.
115. Posted by deyanira_spain on February 20, 2006 06:25 AM
when i first saw this pic I thought i was staring at 2 ghosts. 2 skinny ghosts.
116. Posted by boshea on February 20, 2006 12:17 PM
The both look like Jon Benet Ramsey or the scary twins in the Shining.
117. Posted by liqurice_fish on March 18, 2006 05:03 AM
ok guys, u r all dumb, ok!
the oslen twins r the most hottest chicks eva.
how can u say such mean things about them when you dont even no them?
you do not no that when you r putting other people down its becouse you fell uncomfortable about yourself?
i bet u r all ugly and really you wish that you r that hot......... but ur not!
so fuking off! fat ugly bitches!
118. Posted by liqurice_fish on March 18, 2006 05:03 AM
ok guys, u r all dumb, ok!
the oslen twins r the most hottest chicks eva.
how can u say such mean things about them when you dont even no them?
you do not no that when you r putting other people down its becouse you fell uncomfortable about yourself?
i bet u r all ugly and really you wish that you r that hot......... but ur not!
so fuking off! fat ugly bitches!
119. Posted by ker on March 20, 2006 05:41 AM
wow!!! im 119th commented....
anyway marykate and ashley is hott! i said HOT! there u go number 102, somebody said they are hot...
the irony here, people always says ashley is supposed to be beautiful one, and is actually taller than mary-kate... the irony is marykate is more of a recongized fashionista-er and they make her pretty than her sister ashley-- and make marykate looks taller than her, and more distinct features im glad they make mary-kate prettier than ashley...
but nevertheless, how can they be ugly??---------
http://www.absolutenow.com/photos/Olsen_JS17208265.html
http://img107.imagevenue.com/img.php?loc=loc24&image=27940_olsen_twins_050207_06.jpg
120. Posted by Vikktar on April 11, 2006 04:50 AM
Sounds like a whole lot of jealousy here to me. These girls are stunningly beautiful, and a woman needn't be an amazon or have huge, pedulous, fat-bags hanging off her chest to be attractive. There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with being petite, slender, and small breasted - if fact, it's preferable. Females look beautiful and more feminine when they are petite. I cannot believe anyone would bitch because a young woman is petite. Should she be big and masculine instead? I'm guessing we have a lot of overweight, enormous, unattractive women and "chubby chaser" men commenting here.
121. Posted by meisa on April 19, 2006 01:01 PM
Come on guys, I get that your sick little weakness is you like to bash celebs, but consider the fact that what you are viewing is an ad!! they modeled for it, that's not what they look like on a day to day basis. They have people like you trashing them everyday, and I don't think I'd smile a lot in public either.
I think Ashley is gorgeous and MK can be pretty when she's not doing the trash bag look. Give them a break, they make a living just like you do..only they've been doing since they were six months old.