February 07, 2006
Britney Spears defends idiocy
Britney Spears has come out to defend the photos of her driving with her baby in her lap, saying in a statement:
"I was terrified that this time the physically aggressive paparazzi would put both me and my baby in danger. I instinctively took measures to get my baby and me out of harm's way, but the paparazzi continued to stalk us. I love my child and would do anything to protect him."
I'm sure there's some sort of logic in this statement, I just can't figure it out. Only Britney Spears could think that her rolls of thigh fat would be safer than the protective seat especially designed to keep babies alive. I guess that's what goes through your mind when you have the mental capacity of a cucumber.
Previous Entries
» Scarlett Johansson and Keira Knightley pose nude in Vanity Fair» Britney Spears is a great mom
» Mischa Barton and Cisco Adler live the dream
» Kate Moss helps Colin Farrell stay sober
» Nikki Cox and Jay Mohr are engaged


Comments
1. Posted by escapevelocity on February 7, 2006 05:17 PM
probably the weed talking, as she looks way too lax in this picture. her face doesn't at all express alarm/panic, much less concern.
2. Posted by Catscratch on February 7, 2006 05:19 PM
Can I smack her. Please?
I'm sure a 2X4 firmly applied to the back of her head will wise her up. I have one.
Can I??? Pretty please?
3. Posted by Krister on February 7, 2006 05:23 PM
Can we officially rename her baby "Airbag"?
4. Posted by Redd Foxx on February 7, 2006 05:23 PM
She probably thinks airbags are like pillows. Hah.
5. Posted by DannyJames on February 7, 2006 05:24 PM
i love how all the celebrities nowadays can just blame their idiocy on the paparazzi. Oh i crashed cuz of the paparazzi. Oh i drove with the baby on my lap cuz of the paparazzi. Oh i snort coke off my keys cuz of the paparazzi.
6. Posted by pixelbasic on February 7, 2006 05:24 PM
That’s a real nice statement her lawyer drew up...’took measures?’ Yep I’m sure she talks like that.
7. Posted by MortyFishbein on February 7, 2006 05:26 PM
Considering the accidents celebrities have been in involving cars because of the photographers, you think she'd have called the cops or at least tried to get her baby away from herself. She is the primary target, not him.
This bitch needs to put down the Cheetos and pick up a book. At this point, any book will do.
8. Posted by escapevelocity on February 7, 2006 05:27 PM
#5: yeap, scarlett johanssen did the exact same thing:
http://www.thesuperficial.com/archives/2005/08/23/scarlett_johans_6.html
media backlash.
9. Posted by escapevelocity on February 7, 2006 05:29 PM
#6: figured that one out when i read the word "terrified."
10. Posted by HughJorganthethird on February 7, 2006 05:33 PM
Ok let me get this straight, the paparazzi were going to kill or grievously wound Britney and her baby so in order to PROTECT it she jammed into her Federline-smelling crotch and sped away at high speed?
All I can say is thank god. How many more celebrities have to die at the hands of these camera wielding bastards before someone, like say George Clooney, does something about it? Forget Corretta Scott King, Britney is the true hero of the day.
Moron.
11. Posted by Allie D. on February 7, 2006 05:35 PM
I just found this out that Brittney Spears is Latin for "Please beat in the back of my head with a 2x4". So technically, she's asking for it!
12. Posted by Linnea on February 7, 2006 05:36 PM
She doesn't look very terrified. But maybe that is the sort of placid horror that hicks with a fifth grade education disply.
13. Posted by Linnea on February 7, 2006 05:37 PM
*display.
And yes, I do see the irony.
14. Posted by hermanita on February 7, 2006 05:38 PM
Well how smart is that? The paparazzi's fallowing me, so I'm just gonna grab my baby and put him on my lap, in the front seat, without a seatbelt, where the photographers can see it clearly. Then I'm gonna drive with only one hand. And in case of emergency, my baby will be right infront of me so when I fall in the front, on top of him with my layers of fat, he will be protected. Yes...that makes sence.
15. Posted by playahater101 on February 7, 2006 05:38 PM
Po Po Palease!!!!!!!!!!! Nice excuse.
16. Posted by maiira on February 7, 2006 05:43 PM
I kind of liked the phallic reference here: "...the mental capacity of a cucumber." Brilliant.
As for Brit...I just think the kid's on her lap because she can't afford a carseat. Or doesn't know what one is.
17. Posted by blackblackheart on February 7, 2006 05:45 PM
Britney Spears is a fucking idiot.
18. Posted by em167 on February 7, 2006 05:50 PM
Does everyone except her notice that the steering wheel (and AIRBAG) are aimed right at the baby's head? I've been in a wreck before and had the airbag hit me and it HURTS... imagine what it would do to a 5 month old baby!
19. Posted by frangly on February 7, 2006 05:54 PM
Could she BE any more white trash?
20. Posted by eastboundanddown on February 7, 2006 05:55 PM
I think it's pretty obvious that the little Federline is already driving.
21. Posted by happy_bunny on February 7, 2006 05:58 PM
The passenger-side door is open and the background is unblurred. The car's not moving.
22. Posted by Debra on February 7, 2006 06:05 PM
"I was terrified that this time the physically aggressive paparazzi would put both me and my baby in danger. NOBODY gets to put my baby in danger but ME."
(and you think the car wasn't moving? You think neither Britney nor her rep could have come up with that as an excuse if it was the case? Just because the pic may have been taken before the car went far -- no blurring and the passenger didn't have a chance to close his door -- she obviously drove with the baby in her lap cuz she tries to DEFEND *WHY* SHE DROVE WITH HER BABY IN HER LAP.)
23. Posted by Member #19 on February 7, 2006 06:12 PM
happy_bunny - In the shot posted here at The Superficial it's difficult to tell, but if you look at the other pictures from this series you can see that the car is in traffic, and the passenger door and window are clearly closed.
This is CLASSIC white trash. Between this and K-FedEx trying to get the baby's ears pierced, this is going to be one effed up little kid. "I was so terrified for the safety of my child that I didn't wear a seatbelt and I placed it in my lap with its head directly between my overweight ass and the explosive power of an air bag."
24. Posted by Aimtrue on February 7, 2006 06:21 PM
Her story is Bullsh** The kid would tip over if he was just sitting in her lap- the kid is not old enough to support himself. The kid is strapped into one of those baby carrier things. Which means BS got into the car with him strapped in. If she feared for the safety of the kid she could have walked away from the car and called 911 to get the paparazzi off her. Or she could have got int he car and had the guy in the passenger seat drive with her in the back seat. She was just to f'ing lazy to unstrap the kid fromt he carrier and put him in the car seat. Can anyone say child endangerment and you lose custody of your kid? She should be arrested. This is why she and k-fed should be sterilized. They do not have the mental capcity to put the life of a child ahead of their own. What's next- I feared that gunman would shoot me so I used that blob of flesh as a shield?
25. Posted by amma on February 7, 2006 06:35 PM
This is so beyond irresponsible. Clearly, someone was taking pictures of her--otherwise we wouldn't be looking at them.
But that only makes it worse! What if she really had had to flee? Being a parent, and knowing how close that baby's head is to the steering wheel...I mean, that child could be killed or maimed for life if she stops too fast or just taps something...It is criminal. All joking aside, she should have to effing take a driver's ed class and pay a huge, huge, huge fine. I hope this is on the cover of every magazine...not because I don't like her {don't anymore} but because this is so freaking dangerous!
26. Posted by Wild Rose on February 7, 2006 06:43 PM
"Why"?..we're all asking..."Why"?
Well, the answer is obvious. Britney didn't want the cameras capturing a shot of her *Huge Ass* while she strapped her baby safely into his car seat. Which brings us to our next question...why the hell didn't she get that *useless lump of shit* sitting next to her to do the honours?
27. Posted by suzy on February 7, 2006 06:47 PM
ok, i was watching the view this morning and they were talking about this because it was in the ny post...
what they said happened was that her bodyguard stopped at a local little coffee place, and then britney got out while she waited for him and she went to go check on her kid and you know... what mom's do.. then her bodyguard came out and paparazzi came out of no where... so she was trying to get out of there as soon as possible, and she wasn't thinking.. and she knows what she did.. but she was trying to protect her son from anything bad... i think she believed that she had no time to put her child back in his carseat...
shit happens.. she's still learning.. i dont think it's fair to start beating her up because she made this one mistake... but keep in mind that she is trying to be a mom and being in the public eye at all times.. it's like 2 full time jobs.. just like a regular mom would have with her other job if she had one.
God forbid anyone make a mistake and learn from it. She was just trying to protect her kid.
And kill me for defending her.
28. Posted by Zed on February 7, 2006 06:47 PM
happy_bunny,
go here: http://www.dlisted.blogspot.com/
and scroll until you find the article "Hi I'm Britney Spears and My Brains Are Mashed Potatoes"
Now that you are there, notice the changing scenery in the background of the photos, proving vehicle movement. And there's another photo clearly showing Britney with Sean in her lap, the body guard in the passenger seat, and the vehicle sitting in traffic (she's in the fast lane no less).
Face it. She is an idiot. There's no getting around it.
29. Posted by bravegirl01 on February 7, 2006 06:48 PM
per CNN, officials say they can't charge her with endangerment because no cops saw her dandling Sean and driving...if paparazzi wanted to get really good shots, they should have dropped a dime and called the child welfare...those shots would bring in $$$$$
30. Posted by Michaela on February 7, 2006 07:06 PM
You know what's interesting? She doesn't look one bit 'terrified'. Her bodyguard doesn't look frazzled or upset, he looks as though he's having an enjoyable conversation with someone on the other line. Oh, and why is there not one photo of her or her bodyguard maybe looking in the rear view mirror?
I have 2 words for Britney...child services
31. Posted by Allie D. on February 7, 2006 07:06 PM
I think I've got a pretty good hit going here:
Oh baby baby, how was I supposed to know
That you would need a carseat
Oh baby baby, the Babies R Us was closed
So next I'll try the Wal-Mart
Show me how to raise my baby
Cuz I'm busy, actin like a washed up redneck now!
My stupidness is in my genes
I hope Shawn lives until he's 3
But I'm not sure he'll even get that far
Cuz I'm his mom
And I hold my baby when I drive!
32. Posted by MortyFishbein on February 7, 2006 07:16 PM
Suzy (27), you're fucking stupid.
Knowing the POWER of an AIRBAG and the forces involved with driving an SUV in L.A. traffic (which Ms. Spears MUST know something about even if she doesn't know how to dress or wash or pick husbands), you should know you just don't jeopardize your CHILD'S LIFE by deciding it's better to make sure no one takes pictures of you or him.
A car accident is no joke and it's certainly not a joke when you're driving a 5,000 pound Lincoln Navigator. That stupid bitch should have sucked it up and took her no-makeup fat, stankin' sweat pants wearin' ass and strapped her child into his car seat. If she wanted to get away because she looked horrible (which is what a friend of her assitant told me), well, she should have remembered the HUNDREDS OF PHOTOS of her looking cracked out that we already have. No thinks she looks like she did on the cover of "Oops . . . I Did It Again."
This shit her and her publicist is just that--shit. And you're dumb as hell for defending her country ass.
33. Posted by LoneWolf on February 7, 2006 07:21 PM
Outgrageous. Irresponsible. Illegal.
Just because you're rich and/or famous doesn't mean that you aren't as stupid as a bag of hammers. Here's a perfect example.
My guess is that nothing will come of this. Jacko dangled his kid over a balcony and nothing happened. In both cases, it's a damn shame.
34. Posted by powerpuffgrl1969 on February 7, 2006 07:29 PM
Allie D, you need to get that shit recorded because it's HILARIOUS. Put it on a website; if K-Fed can do it, so can you.
35. Posted by Precisely on February 7, 2006 07:29 PM
X17, the photo agency responsible for the pics, tells "Extra," "These pictures were taken in a very peaceful context, in which photographers exhibited no aggressive behavior. We believe the pictures speak for themselves."
Poster #31 - Funny :)
36. Posted by DuckBoy on February 7, 2006 07:31 PM
Okay, this was a dumn move. Any you can all say what you want about her idiotic decision here...BUT
STOP CALLING HER FAT!!! OMG! She is NOT FAT! In fact, have you seen recent pictures of her? She looks AMAZING! Here's one of her last night at a pre-Grammy party:
http://www.britneyalbum.com/details.php?image_id=26203&sessionid=b53f0fcc74d748eec705a9eaa7a89448
The tabloids and websites like this use old and unflattering pics to convince people she is fat and ugly. Then they say it over and over in an attempt to make it more true. Look for yourselves...
37. Posted by escapevelocity on February 7, 2006 07:34 PM
i agree with #32 - except for the "Suzy you're fucking stupid" part.
a horrible early morning picture of you with your kid is better than a picture of your broken kid's neck in between you and an inflated airbag.
38. Posted by escapevelocity on February 7, 2006 07:35 PM
#36: OMG, K-Fed's going out with Mariah Carey!
39. Posted by Precisely on February 7, 2006 07:39 PM
X17, the photo agency responsible for the pics, tells "Extra," "These pictures were taken in a very peaceful context, in which photographers exhibited no aggressive behavior. We believe the pictures speak for themselves."
Forgot to add that yes these guys have been seen as being aggressive, but she looks calm.
Silently debating Mcdonald's or Pizza Hut for dinner.
40. Posted by ESQ on February 7, 2006 07:40 PM
Too little, too late you stupid hillbilly. She can’t get around the fact a) her douche bag, whatever the fuck he is security guard, fluffer, etc could not take the baby and secure him? What does she pay him for? b) The simple fact that EVERYONE has posted about on this board is that the car is in a standing motion. Who cares if the paparazzi snaps a few pics, secure your baby because NO MATTER WHAT that child comes first!
Ever since she met up with K-Fucked her money, life and career have gone done the tubes. I revel in the day Lawrence Welk albums out sell her cds. Brit used to be hot, now she is nothing but a fat ass going to white trash hell fast.
41. Posted by MortyFishbein on February 7, 2006 07:41 PM
Duckboy (or Kevin Federline, if you prefer), you need to get your head out of Britney's oozing, Cheeto-douched snatch and smell the coffee, if you can clean the Brit juice out fast enough.
She's still dumbass, "fat" or not.
42. Posted by theyareidiots on February 7, 2006 07:41 PM
#28, thanks for the link to the additional pics. The last one clearly shows that, unlike her bodyguard, she doesn't have her seatbelt on.
Her excuse is lame. If she was so afraid of the paparazzi, she could have gotten in back and strapped the kid in while the *bodyguard* drove away.
It's too bad no charges will be filed. This is criminal stupidity in the first degree.
43. Posted by PapaHotNuts on February 7, 2006 07:43 PM
EVERYONE SETTLE DOWN!!! In order to avoid the press, she took off in hurry and neglected to put the baby in his carseat. It's an honest mistake. I've been in a situation like this before. My youngest son and I were walking along the beach one day. Out of the corner of my eye, I saw a poisonous jellyfish just a couple feet from us. And then I did what any parent would do (especially Brittany), I threw my 5 month old as far as could into the ocean so that mean ol' jellyfish couldn't sting him. I never saw him again after that, but it wasn't because that fuckin' jellyfish bit him. Brittany obviously shares the same parental instinct I have. So everyone can just go fuck off. Luv ya' Britt!!
PapaHotNuts-1
Jellyfish-0
44. Posted by spamnews on February 7, 2006 07:43 PM
'DuckBoy' has comitted two serious crimes. 1) He claims these pictures are, and I quote 'old'. Try to stick with the tour, 'k ducky? These are like new, ya know? So like, the 'media' isn't like trying to make her look like fat, they are like showing her DRVIVING WITH HER FUCKING BABY ON HER LAP.
Secondly, he used the concatenation 'OMG' For this he must be punished harshly.
45. Posted by escapevelocity on February 7, 2006 07:44 PM
#39: i'd go for Pizza Hut. they have those new cheese bites crust pizza whatchamacallit. jessica simpson's voice in the tv ad's got me hypnotized. *sings to the tune of "These Boots Were Made" while i myself dial pizza hut's #* "one of these days these bites are gonna pop all over you."
46. Posted by HughJorganthethird on February 7, 2006 07:46 PM
C'mon people. Could it not be that maybe her beaver is so mishapen and stretched out from having such a large headed child that it now resembles a child car seat and the lad was safley wrapped up in the protective beef curtians?
We can only hope.
47. Posted by Catherine on February 7, 2006 07:51 PM
Sorry Britney, there's no defense for being a TOTAL ignoramus. Your story is crap.
48. Posted by mofe on February 7, 2006 07:59 PM
Maybe she was teaching him how to drive. LOL! How could she do that especially when she knows she's got a hound of paparazzi following her 24/7?!? It was probably another publicity stunt to promote Kevin's CD. How sad.
49. Posted by che1964 on February 7, 2006 08:08 PM
Sad thing is, if she had had an accident the headline would have been, "Paparazzi kill Britney's Baby", Not the fact that she killed the kid as soon as her feeble assed mind place the kid on her lap in the parking lot. But I guess a baby's hoodie is a great place to put your smokes while your drive, that way you can just reach in and pull one out with your teeth.
50. Posted by Mermaid on February 7, 2006 08:12 PM
come on...lets give britney a break! I'll bet there was a big bag of cheetos waiting for her at the end of her drive. she was just hungry.
51. Posted by rachel on February 7, 2006 08:32 PM
Didn't she leave her kid in the back seat of the car when her and stupid ass went out one night?
52. Posted by choatie on February 7, 2006 08:57 PM
whoa. whoa.
she IS fat:
http://steelturman.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/obese.JPG
53. Posted by Tracie on February 7, 2006 09:07 PM
This was posted on the other Brit thread by SL500gt:
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3494/635/400/brit1.19.jpg
That's a picture from the side.
Look BEYOND brit. The background is BLURRY.
It's blurry because the car is MOVING.
And if she ISN'T driving, how'd she get to this intersection with the baby in her lap, right there under the steering wheel? With ANOTHER suv behind her?
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3494/635/400/brit5.3.jpg
Just thought I'd repost it, as YES she was IN MOTION. She's admitted it. That dumb bunny doesn't even wear a seatbelt herself.
54. Posted by Big Fig on February 7, 2006 09:08 PM
I was in an accident going only 30mph, the airbag broke my freakin nose, it really really sucked. Now, imagine what an airbag would do to an infant. I've been saying Britney Spears was a waste of life for years... now there's photo evidence. She'd better save her money for all the therapy that kid's gonna need.
55. Posted by funkygoldmedallions on February 7, 2006 09:10 PM
Kevin to Britney: Yo, yo, yo, what up?
Britney: Y'all, I just got chased by the fotog dudes with the baby strapped to my bumpy's.
Kevin: Dammit B,ya could a killed him! Next time, squeeze him between the moonshine bottles in the back of the pickup where he belongs. Popozao!!
56. Posted by sawzy on February 7, 2006 09:21 PM
http://tmz.aol.com/article1?id=20060207134409990001
(Feb. 7) -- An LA County Sheriff's official has told TMZ that the LA County Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) will investigate the incident involving Britney Spears and her son.
put her in jail.
57. Posted by Taximom on February 7, 2006 09:22 PM
Hey everyone--that's an innocent baby. He did not ask for this. Any person in an authoritative position might think about some sort of intervention....
58. Posted by SoBeIt on February 7, 2006 09:34 PM
PapaHotNuts (43) – That was freaking hilarious!! That is, sadly, along the same line of logic as Titney's "excuse".
Good one!
59. Posted by xAgonyxScenex on February 7, 2006 09:38 PM
I can somewhat understand that. Like maybe the pics were taken Just as she grabbed the kid and got in the car to get away from them. For all we know seconds later she gave the kid to the bodyguard to strap in his car seat.
60. Posted by che1964 on February 7, 2006 09:39 PM
Taximom...What are you saying ?? To give a slap on the wrist and say,"Bad Britney, Bad." and walk away because she had money...
Fuck That!!! If this was anyone else the sheriff would have cuffed them and the kid would already be in a home...Sad for the kid but personally I'm tired of these actors, singers getting drunk,stupid, whatever and getting away with it. Hell, Matthew Brodrick KILLED not one but TWO women back in 1988 in Ireland while drunk and all he got was a fine of...get this $175. If it had been me I'd still be there rotting away. EQUAL justice for all.
61. Posted by Allie D. on February 7, 2006 09:56 PM
LMAO @ "protective beef curtains" HAHAHAHAAHAHA!!!
Post of the day.
62. Posted by ktringa on February 7, 2006 09:59 PM
I dont know if anyone else remembers seeing another picture of Brit with the baby outside of his car seat....but I do. I can't find it, but I know it is out there....she is sitting in the back seat of a suv, holding the baby on her lap.....any one remember that? Not the first time the genius has feared for her and her baby's safety, apparently.
63. Posted by kfedismybabydaddy on February 7, 2006 09:59 PM
You know I was actually thinking that this dumbass might be a decent mother even though she is a complete idiot. Proves me wrong. Poor kid.
64. Posted by Misstee on February 7, 2006 10:00 PM
It's so annoying how celebrities want to blame everything on the papparazzi. I'm so sure the papparazzi snapping pictures was more dangerous than this moron driving with her baby in her lap @@
The media helped Britney become the star she is with all her millions. Yet she's quick to blame them for her stupid, moronic decisions any chance she gets. Many celebs do this.
These days, you can't even leave the hospital after giving birth without a nurse checking to make sure you have a proper restraint seat for the baby. They practically drill it into your head that the baby needs to be restrained at ALL times. Britney is a complete moron and there's no other explanation for her actions.
65. Posted by pixel killya on February 7, 2006 10:13 PM
Just beyond fucking belief. And on top of everything else, a child on the lap would require constant attention...thus exponentially increasing the possibility of an accident by the dumbass behind the wheel.
Die Britney Die!
66. Posted by Dee on February 7, 2006 10:15 PM
I would say her 'career' is officially over, she's nothing more then a curiosity, just like Wacko Jacko.
67. Posted by nikki on February 7, 2006 10:26 PM
To #36 and all the idiots who are arguing over whether this dumb-ass broad is fat, that is NOT the issue.
the issue is that she endangered the life of her child. if a poor-ass Latina woman had done the same thing, CPS would have insisted on placing a Safety Plan around this child. but dumb-ass Britney does it and she may get away with it. and the child remains at risk. THAT is the important issue.
whether she has a fat-ass and pulls in her guy with the help of Curvation doesn't much matter right now. y'hear?
68. Posted by nikki on February 7, 2006 10:28 PM
i meant to say pulls in her GUT with the help of Curvation. ooops!
but that is NOT the issue at hand.
69. Posted by Sheva on February 7, 2006 10:44 PM
You people just calm down. If you were in Hollywood and a big star you would know that the most important thing is not to be caught in a bad photo.
Now if your kid goes down at least there's no bad photo of you.
But hey, there's a solution. Suicide, but in this case, let's make it murder/suicide. This way you can take Suzy with you.
And no more bad photos. Then you'll be a James Dean star forever Brit.
Can you handle my truth bitch?
70. Posted by fluku on February 7, 2006 10:59 PM
Her parenting skills arent all that bad,
At least she has the common sense to realize that keeping her baby on her lap directly in front of the steering wheel while speeding her SUV down a highway is still safer than having Federline hold the baby.
71. Posted by Shaun on February 7, 2006 11:05 PM
I am speechless. One would think she could afford proper security. I understand she needs to drive herself around instead of being chauffeured all the time. But WTF is wrong with these people? The sad part is child endangerment laws won't affect her because she is a celeb.
The proof is right there.
Absolutely useless. Plus she is apparently pregnant with another one?
Oh Heavinly Father, please keep those children out of harms way. They did nothing to deserve this Bullsh*t parenting. If I saw K-Fed right now I'd knock him flat on his ass. I'd be an over night success just because of it. Wow, famous people get dumber by the minute.
I'm out.
72. Posted by Evangelia on February 7, 2006 11:16 PM
Che1964 (#60)...wow, I had no idea about Matthew Broderick...that story is outrageous and so, so saddening.
I did some poking around about celebrities who have accidentally killed people, and found out that Laura Bush killed a teenager when she ran a stop sign in high school.
Shockingly, the paperwork regarding the event has mysteriously "disappeared".
73. Posted by anymart on February 7, 2006 11:28 PM
NOTE TO BRITANY's PUBLICIST:
Here's what you do: First- have Britany visit LA Children's Hospital in private and see the kids that are undergoing rehabilitation for acquired brain injuries. Kids whose parents did everything RIGHT (like car seats) and the kids still had strokes or were injured in other unavoidable ways. Sad but may be sobering for her.
Second- create and fund a campaign to promote car seat safety. Britany will be the spokesperson. This will reach out to young-ish parents to let them know that she made a mistake and has now been educated and wants to spread the word. Almost 50% of car seats are installed incorrectly...so she could help tackle this problem.
All of your posts are hilarious and right on the money. But this is awful that she is exhibiting such risky and impulsive behavior. I want to HOPE that this will be a wake up call and that she'll turn it into a positive.
But I'm fairly certain that she'll maintain a defensive posture and we'll all start referring to kids allowed to ride not in car seats as "pulling a britany". Too bad.
74. Posted by LickyLicky on February 8, 2006 12:06 AM
ROTFFLMAO!!! PAPAHOTNUTS, WILL YOU MARRY ME?
Bigamy is legal in LA, right?
75. Posted by Lipgloss Assassin on February 8, 2006 12:12 AM
"I love my child and would do anything to protect him."
Your baby is half you/half Popozao. The damage's been done, lady.
76. Posted by Lilmissy on February 8, 2006 12:44 AM
Omg, First they say she was parked then they say she was driving. Make your mind up!
77. Posted by fluku on February 8, 2006 01:06 AM
clearly that statement could not have been made britney, why its peppered with big words like "I" and "in".
78. Posted by ishtar on February 8, 2006 02:33 AM
#75 HAHAHA half Popozao...anywhooo why couldnt she just give the baby to the guy next to her? Id think it'd be easier to 'flee' without a baby in her lap...just a thought
79. Posted by kroft on February 8, 2006 03:02 AM
This is indeed all over the news. The espn sportstalk show was covering it. Nothing will come of it. It's a damn irresponsible, dangerous and illegal thing to do though.
Blame all the teenage girls who made Britney rich and famous. She's never been anything more than a moderately attractive, moderately talented (being generous here), not very intelligent girl. There's nothing special about her at all except for the fact that the marketing people sold her to impressionable teenage girls and the girls ate it up.
I guess I kind of understand. Seeing Britney up there "performing," must have made a girl think, "I could do that too." Any halfway-attractive girl who could carry some semblance of a tune and not fall over when doing a few basic dance steps could have been Britney. Just takes some good marketing, a good makeup artist and a good sound mixer. Britney gave all the little white trash girls hope. Now they must see...she's just the same as them. Maybe even a little dumber.
80. Posted by Myndela on February 8, 2006 03:14 AM
Hearing about this earlier in the day sickened me... But what sickens me just as much, if not more, is that there are some people on this board that are sticking up for her! They are simply as braindead as she is. One thing you never do is drive around with your infant, and not have him in a carseat. One little accident, and that baby could have been paralyzed or killed by that airbag.
Also, in one of the pictures of her, I thought she looked like she was smiling. If she was in such a bad situation, and she was so fearful that her baby would be injured by the big bad paparazzi and their Kodaks, why wasn't there a stressful, worried look on her face? This is why I sometimes people should be forced to be on birth control until they take parenting classes that deem smart enough to be decent parents, and they can be taken off the birth control and start the fertilizing. If they can't pass the course after three tries, they will be permanently sterilized, because who wants their stupid asses raising kids, and their bad genes being brought forth in another generation?
81. Posted by marmar on February 8, 2006 04:31 AM
Seriously..... get over it.
82. Posted by Xiangzi on February 8, 2006 06:01 AM
Who the hell cares about the safety of Britney and her baby? No, really.
I want to know why none of you have commented on the fact that not only was she endangering the lives of herself and her son, what about the rest of us???
Screw her and her spawn of satan, what about the poor person she will end up killing when she is being "chased" by the paparazzi and just so HAPPENS to decide to "protect" her son again?
It has been established time and time again that BRITNEY SPEARS IS NOT INTELLIGENT. You just need to hear the bitch talk and you can feel your iq dropping. I don't know about the rest of you, but when she speaks I feel like cutting off my own ears.
Lets de-construct her statement, just for fun:
"I was terrified that this time the physically aggressive paparazzi would put both me and my baby in danger. I instinctively took measures to get my baby and me out of harm's way, but the paparazzi continued to stalk us. I love my child and would do anything to protect him."
"Physically aggressive paparazzi" - So where was the shunting, the car ramming, the 1 zillion bajillion miles an hour they were driving at? In fact, I would love to know what the percieved THREAT actually was.
"Put me and my baby in danger" - Oh yeah, and sticking him between your thighs while holding him with one hand WHILE YOU DRIVE A CAR is going to really up his chances of survival if the paparazzi are driving aggressively.
"I instinctively took measures to get my baby and me out of harm's way, but the paparazzi continued to stalk us." - So really, she failed anyway. Apart from exposing her son to all the diseases he didn't contract when she gave birth, AND despite her best and most sincere efforts to "protect" him from the rabid paparazzi (who, lets face it, will obviously do ANYTHING to see inadvertantly kill a superstar and her 5 month old son), she FAILED anyway, because they continued to stalk her.
I am not going to comment on the last sentence, it is simply too idiotic, and by now, I think you MUST have understood my point, which is:
Britney Spears is a media loving whore.
Got children services?
83. Posted by gossipmonger on February 8, 2006 08:35 AM
Suzy (and anyone else defending this useless waste of oxygen called Britney...)
Before you go off on your high and mighty defence of the braindead, maybe you should check out the rest of the photos... Terrified, MY ASS! I saw 4 or 5 photos on the news and in at least 2 she has a huge grin on her face. Now maybe you smile when in danger, but myself and the majority of the population tend to react a bit differently when terrified.
My guess is it went like this: she was out driving with Sean on her lap, not a care in the world. Suddenly she saw someone taking pics and thought "oh shit, busted. Quick, gimme a phone, I need advice" (calls lawyer, gets statement to release) picks up phone again... " Hello, People Magazine? This is Britney, Oh, my life was in danger today and I need you to print a story for me".
Dumbass bitch should have been sterilized before being let out of the bayou!
84. Posted by Mr. Fritz on February 8, 2006 08:47 AM
Britney Spears is a media whore like Michael Jackson. She is a "has been" and will do anything to remain in the public eye. Like stealing married men, breaking up a family, marrying a douchebag, and walking barefoot to use a gas station bathroom. She is so hard up for press, she will put her baby in danger. All of this attention probably gives the scumbag an orgasm.
85. Posted by PapaHotNuts on February 8, 2006 08:58 AM
LickyLicky,
Marriage proposal accepted. See you in Vegas.
86. Posted by gossipmonger on February 8, 2006 09:30 AM
One question:if she's running FROM the photographers as she claims, why are the photos' front and side views, and not from behind, as one would expect if they were "chasing" Britney...
87. Posted by bafongu on February 8, 2006 09:46 AM
To be fair to the baleen whale, she's not out seeking publicity, and the leeches are outside her door 24/7. Proof? Who do you think took all the pictures you're seeing? What needs to happen is for a few thugs to come out swinging 2x4s at the leech papparazzi. This chase for the photos is so out of control drastic measures are sure to be next.
88. Posted by Whatup on February 8, 2006 09:54 AM
K-fed was probably laughing his ass off and choking on some fucking cheetos while they sped off to the trailer park.
89. Posted by reesestet on February 8, 2006 10:13 AM
According to the rumour-mill, K-Fed sold the baby's car seat to by a copy of his album because nobody else will!
90. Posted by LaydeeBug on February 8, 2006 10:37 AM
Let's see, Suzy is a douche, and Britney was trying to protect her baby from what? Flash bulbs? I liked the post about zombies. That was great! Physically aggressive papparazzi...you know if she can tell me what the word papparazzi actually means and where it was derived from (not the language, that's too easy) then I'll vote to acquit (is that how you spell it?)
91. Posted by Alia on February 8, 2006 10:41 AM
Out of the whole statement made by her the one that she LOVES her son I happen to find to be true. However, loving a child and caring for a child are two different things. I am so sick of some people's comments to give her a break she's a young mother. Like give us a break Suzy and few others, she is 25 years old and not a 12 year old living in a backwoods swamp... at least not anymore. I have no children but I would not even hold my CAT in my lap in the front seat of a moving car. The saddest thing though is the baby and that nothing will be done to PROTECT him.
92. Posted by DaniBoBani on February 8, 2006 10:52 AM
She might be protecting her baby from paparazzi, but who is going to protect her baby from her?!
93. Posted by chryssy11 on February 8, 2006 11:11 AM
I wonder what she said to her mother "But Mama, Nobody likes me anymore, it's all about Sean Preston! He was trying to upstage me, but I won't let him. (Stomping up and down) I won't! I won't! I thought if I put him on my lap and drove 100 mph I'd teach him a lesson."
Can you imagine what kind of adult Sean will turn out to be with his parent's genes. Poor little shit. And to think she may be pregnant again. There seriously should be at least a competency test required to reproduce.
94. Posted by Aimtrue on February 8, 2006 12:18 PM
I took my baby out of harms way - I shot him. or something like that
95. Posted by The Spartanete on February 8, 2006 12:33 PM
#43-- I laughed so hard when I read that I literally CRIED, tears streaming down my cheeks, nd everyone around me wanted to know what was so funny, so I tried to read it aloud but couldn't make it through a sentence without getting caught up in hysterics. Thank you for releasing some much-needed endorphins into my bloodstream.
96. Posted by MissKitty on February 8, 2006 01:46 PM
The cops need to pay a visit to this stupid f*cking bitch at the very least. Her excuse is a joke. Having a child under 4 years old and under 40lbs in a moving vehicle without being in a car seat is ILLEGAL. She can't make her own laws. And how was the baby safer in her lap than in his car seat? What would have happened if she'd had to brake suddenly, or if she'd gotten rear-ended? Yeah, he would have been crushed to death or had a broken neck. I guess this makes it official. Britney Spears is a complete moron.
97. Posted by Smackage on February 8, 2006 01:48 PM
she's the new lindsay lohan AND the new michael jackson!!
98. Posted by LaydeeBug on February 8, 2006 03:07 PM
Hey Britney, if you stop working out, you're gonna get fat. You're built that way ya corn-pone eating, biscuit & gravy scarfing, fried chicken gobbling pudding. Yet she keeps wearing those too-tight, low-cut jeans as if she is still 15. Most women start to lose gravity after 30 ('tis true, I KNOW) but she is on a fast roller-coaster to the bottom. The Fox news last night had an on-line poll asking people what should be done to Britney for her asshole move.
99. Posted by SoupaSarah on February 8, 2006 03:55 PM
Erm, the more you people talk about her the more publicity it is for her.
You laugh but shes got more money than you could imagine.
PS Am I the only Britney Fan on here?? :D
100. Posted by Alley on February 8, 2006 04:44 PM
of course britney is trying to defend her idiocy.... i actually think that she tries to defend it everyday.... but the real problem i believe lies within the hands of Kevin Federlin- excuse me- "K Fed"..... for even thinking about mass producing with someone with this intelligence level.... this is where i believe that we should have him shot
the amazing thing is that if somone NORMAL did this they would be arrested and DYFUS would be involved...
the other sad thing is that she is the role model to some young girls... thats great.... i can imagine how some of these book reports go...
"i did my book report on Britney Spears because she is the best.... she wasn't killing her baby she just wanted to cuddle... i say good job britney...."
and a special thanks to britney for corrupting the youth of america
101. Posted by Skullyzena on February 8, 2006 05:24 PM
Hey... they are investigating her...
"An LA County Sheriff's official has told TMZ that the LA County Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) will investigate the incident involving Britney Spears and her son.
Spears drove in Malibu yesterday with her baby on her lap without any child restraint.
This afternoon, Deputy Sheriff Mark Winn went to Spears home. The official told TMZ Winn made the trip to get contact information for DCFS, so that DCFS “could do their thing.”
Taken from http://rosiedemario.blogspot.com/
102. Posted by hermanita on February 8, 2006 06:07 PM
#27...oh you watch The View...well...that explains that
quote:
"Erm, the more you people talk about her the more publicity it is for her."
-And what does she gain from that? Let’s see…she looses money, since less people want to buy her Cds/watch her movies & she is more hated by more people. Oh yes, yes bad publicity sure is good for her.
"You laugh but shes got more money than you could imagine."
-I'm not laughing, I'm just petrified and very sad that this poor child had to be born from these two...what can I call them...mistakes of mother Earth. We are aware she has tons of money, but sadly she doesn't know how to use them. Instead of buying herself expensive boots and skirts and fake hair that just make her look fatter and uglier, she should rather use them to buy her child a protective seat, get herself a gym card and for God's sake buy herself a new housband (and some shampoo)
PS Am I the only Britney Fan on here?? :D"
-yes you probably are, just like you probably are the only 10 year old fat retard that likes to masturbate to Michael Jackson’s photo on the site aswell
103. Posted by christee on February 8, 2006 08:07 PM
i'm from louisiana...and can honestly say, shitney is just doing what she knows. are they going to wait to see how well she'll drive with two little federlines on her lap, or until they catch her trying to trade her child for a bag of cheetos and a pack of marlboros? just be glad she doesn't hang with the other hollywood trash-bags...because you know that sperm-mill "husband" of hers would knock-up all her "friends." and, dear god, the world doesn't need any more ugly hilton children. i'd like to see the special-britney:live from camp cupcake, but you know it's not coming....
104. Posted by Mr. Fritz on February 8, 2006 08:56 PM
Hey, I was just watching "The Colbert Report". Stephen Colbert tried to explain why the media whore did what she did: "We coddle our children too much...in twenty years we'll have a generation of wimps. We're gonna need them to continue the war in Iraq!" I hope Britney was watching so she can use this as an excuse for the next incident. Stephen Colbert is a fucking genius!
105. Posted by LilJenny on February 8, 2006 09:28 PM
I work in child protection, doing investigations. If this was Jane Schmoe driving around without her kid strapped in and there were pictures floating around, we would be knocking on her door and asking serious questions about her parenting ability. And if she did not cooperate or continued to act stupid, well..... you can guess what would happen.
106. Posted by LickyLicky on February 8, 2006 11:38 PM
What would happen, LilJenny? Would she be given a bigger welfare check and free license to have even more kids and the foodstamps with which to feed them?
I'm moving not far from Kentwood, thanks to that whore, Katrina. I hope whatever makes Bratney stoopid isn't in the water. I like my IQ just as it is.
107. Posted by fluku on February 9, 2006 12:19 AM
she was fleeing from the deadly paparazzi. you know the same people that killed Di
108. Posted by SoupaSarah on February 9, 2006 07:56 AM
#102 your a bigger munter than Kfed!
FYI any publicity is good publicity! Jeez, don't you listen to Max Clifford! And I thought you Americans were supposed to be supreme to everyone else on the planet.... pffft.
109. Posted by SoupaSarah on February 9, 2006 07:57 AM
*You're
110. Posted by quaila83 on February 9, 2006 08:21 AM
NOW IF IT WAS A BLACK WOMAN DOING THAT IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THOSE TROOPERS WILL HAVE A FIELD DAY WITH HER AND LOCK HER UP. THAT BABY HAD A 100% CHANCE OF GETTING MORE BEAT UP THAN HER. BUT THIS IS WHAT KEVIN LEFT SHAR FOR! WHAT A GREAT EXAMPLE TO ALL THE MOTHERS OUT THERE!
111. Posted by auggie1doggie on February 9, 2006 01:16 PM
Look Maw - no hands!
112. Posted by fluku on February 9, 2006 06:39 PM
i used to want to stick me schlong in her mout but now i just want to beat her to death wit it.