January 25, 2006
Jennifer Love Hewitt may pose nude
Here’s the good news: Jennifer Love Hewitt is reportedly considering posing nude in Playboy. The bad news is that according to my sources it is no longer 1997. “Friends” of the actress indicate that she is tired of being offered the same wholesome roles. She’s ready for something more.
"She always gets offered a cute little sidekick role," another friend says. "She told me that maybe a sexy magazine layout with her showing her assets might give her a little edgier image and she might be considered for a femme fatale role. She knows she can pull it off, but she thinks casting directors aren't so sure."
So in accordance with ancient tradition, Jennifer Love Hewitt will assert herself as a sexual being by letting strange men ogle her naked breasts for a reasonable price. I’m not sure it will help, though. I think what’s really holding her back is that god awful singing career in her past. And she dated Carson Daly. Yeah, think about him crawling on top of her while you look at her pictorial and then try masturbating. It just won’t work.
Previous Entries
» Paris Hilton sucking at Sundance» Anne Hathaway is turning into a clown
» Joe Pesci is an angry little man
» Russell Crowe threatens photographers
» Kanye West thinks he's Jesus


Comments
1. Posted by Average on January 25, 2006 07:32 PM
Ive never understood what men see in Hewitt.
Is it just the boobs? Because, otherwise, she looka lika man.
2. Posted by TDubb on January 25, 2006 07:38 PM
A man I would gladly go gay for...
3. Posted by Jayne on January 25, 2006 07:54 PM
she reminds me of a horse.
4. Posted by Kelly on January 25, 2006 07:54 PM
Play boy. . . Maybe she can accidently release a sex tape or better yet do some porn. This girl is so unsexy. I mean did you see her pancake ass in Garfield? YOU CAN BET THOSE PICTS WILL NEED TO BE PHOTOSHOPED!!
5. Posted by Autumn on January 25, 2006 08:01 PM
She has no talent in acting, whether she shows her fakies (which are a dime a dozen in show biz) it's not going to make her a good actress.
6. Posted by uncommon_american on January 25, 2006 08:06 PM
Has she considered stabbing somebody? That's a surefire way to get edgier roles. Genocide, too. They'll take her seriously then. Or if she started eating human flesh.
7. Posted by KMac on January 25, 2006 08:15 PM
I think I speack for all of geekdom when I say....."FINALLY!!!"
8. Posted by KMac on January 25, 2006 08:16 PM
I think I speack for all of geekdom when I say....."FINALLY!!!"
9. Posted by Georgia on January 25, 2006 08:19 PM
Does anyone else think she wears a wig on that show she is on.
Her hair is so strange.
10. Posted by Jeremy1Esq on January 25, 2006 08:35 PM
Just dont tease me like Lisa Guerrero did. Show it all.
11. Posted by porcia83 on January 25, 2006 08:58 PM
They're real...and spectacular. Can't wait to see em..and I agree she should show it all. I mean, what's the whole deal with showing the boobage and no furburgerage ?
12. Posted by ConcreteDreams on January 25, 2006 08:58 PM
It's pretty sad that some girls think that showing themselves naked to the world will gain them respect or something
13. Posted by L.ronhubbard on January 25, 2006 09:00 PM
Ah, she's really cute. If people (as in all the bitter women commenting here) could just look beyond her hooters and the wig they would see Jennifer is truly a splendid actress.
14. Posted by amma on January 25, 2006 09:09 PM
Usually actresses start out in PB, hoping for recognition...I think this is the {well-deserved} nail in the coffin for her career.
She took what should have been 5 minutes of fame and wore it way, waaay out.
15. Posted by hafaball on January 25, 2006 09:10 PM
If he didn't have such a hairy ass...not that I would know! O.o But I'm not sure that would work so well either, last time I checked Jenny McCartney hadn't gotten any huge starring roles :o (and no "Dirty whatever the hell that movie was called" does not count)
16. Posted by Bo_Smith on January 25, 2006 09:20 PM
Isn't it like someone's a great actress and then everyone says "Oh she can act in that film let's go see her" I didn't think an acting career came from Playboy otherwise Paris Hilton would be doing it already
17. Posted by Bo_Smith on January 25, 2006 09:22 PM
That Paris Hilton is smart in some ways
18. Posted by Taelron on January 25, 2006 09:52 PM
I use to thing she was really hot... Dont get me wrong, she is still cute... But anyone else notice how her dimensions have changed? She use to be small hips and big tits... While her tits stopped growing, her hips havent... Now she is starting to get a little bit of the pear shape coming on... Her hips are already twice the size they were when she was a "popular" actress... In another 10 years she will be a Weeble-o...
19. Posted by Jill on January 25, 2006 09:53 PM
It's obvious most of the girls here are jealous. Keep telling yourselves that Jennifer Love Hewitt is ugly. It won't make you look any better, just bitter. And you won't convince the guys otherwise.
There's been a lot of naked-related articles on this site lately.
20. Posted by Taelron on January 25, 2006 09:53 PM
Bo_Smith, three words... House of Wax...
Yeah, Paris has tried the acting bit... lol
21. Posted by HollyJ on January 25, 2006 10:12 PM
She is SOOOOOOO ugly...
I need to drink a gallon of milk of magnesia just to look at her
22. Posted by susie-q on January 25, 2006 10:12 PM
Ha ha to the response by KELLY ...
>>those pics will need to be photoshopped<<
that's just funny ... like when Xerox became a verb
oh if i had a dime for every time someone on here said 'you guys are just jealous' i'd be *&^#$*^*$&@^#$*^ RICH I SAY I'D BE RICH richer than Paris Hilton who doesn't even have the presence of mind get her nails done for a film festival photo op ... sad really
23. Posted by bootface on January 25, 2006 10:16 PM
Just think back on House Arrest....WHAT A FINE PIECE OF ASS
24. Posted by susie-q on January 25, 2006 10:24 PM
The 'more cowbell' girl would sell more issues of playboy than hewitt would.
25. Posted by kw on January 25, 2006 10:27 PM
i've always hated her long narrow head. I didnt think she could act that well either. She's blah. Not ugly just blah. She looks sexy here....
http://www.strangecosmos.com/content/item/104881.html
thats close to naked
26. Posted by rocawear86 on January 25, 2006 10:27 PM
I still she's hot...maybe because she was one of the first celebrities that ever game me a massive boner.
27. Posted by kw on January 25, 2006 10:35 PM
oh yeah i meant to agree with the others #12, that said it sad some girls think they need to get naked to be taken seriously. Its actually really pathetic. I mean, if she was a good actress, then maybe she would have been taken seriously. She's sort of stupid looking and that doesn't help.
I mean really, whats going to happen? She'll pose nude, the world will all be in a frenzy of excitement and suddenly serious roles are going to come pouring in? Maybe I'm just naive.
28. Posted by Average on January 25, 2006 10:37 PM
When an actress is talented and beautiful I admit they are talented and beautiful (I can name 10 I love without thinking about it), but Hewitt is neither.
No jealousy here, just confusion.
Im pretty sure her dimensions did change,wasnt she a teen when she first started? Now she is a woman, most of them have hips.
And to the person who said her rack was fake, I'm pretty sure they are real, they sag like they are.
Kudos to her on that atleast.
29. Posted by Mugato on January 25, 2006 11:07 PM
JLH joins Natalie Portman in the hot but no idea how to be sexy club. But they are real.
30. Posted by cloud nine on January 25, 2006 11:23 PM
Wait, does that mean Jennifer DOESN'T play an edgy femme fatale role in the upcoming Garfield 2 movie? I can't handle any more disappointments like this. I need to lie down.
ps JLH joins Natalie Portman in the actresses I want to slap club.
31. Posted by outfile on January 25, 2006 11:25 PM
I have never bought an issue of playboy, but if she posed, I would buy. She has that wholesome appeal.
In reality she probably snorts up cocaine like a hoover.
32. Posted by supergirllover on January 25, 2006 11:36 PM
My goodness! She ALWAYS wears a wig. Every single thing I've seen her in I ask, "Is that a wig?" She may have alopecia. Which means she is smooth all over. I am buying that issue of Playboy. I am not gay but damn it she is hot! A triple threat (boobs, waist and hips)!
33. Posted by Sheva on January 25, 2006 11:53 PM
If she's in Playboy I'm there. I think she has a good interesting show too with CBS. Don't know the old history but on my very large screen in HD, I still get a kick out seeing how good she looks.
If others want to disagree, please go find a an available bathroom stall at the local showing of Bareback Mountain.
34. Posted by blackblackheart on January 26, 2006 12:33 AM
KMac
I think the rest of geakdom can spell "speak", and wait for their browser so that they don't look like an ass double-posting. :)
PLEASE! This is the same woman who uttered the sentence "I was J.Lo before she was.".... COME ON.. She's meh anyway, ugly..
35. Posted by clarkehead on January 26, 2006 12:34 AM
Yeah, I'm in too. When that issue hits newstands, I'll take the day off of work.
36. Posted by The Devil on January 26, 2006 12:51 AM
LOL @ clarkehead (#35)
I'm squeezing (#21) HollyJ's tits again, but now I'm thinking of JLH while doing it.
JLH is pure hotness. Naysayers are either jealous, blind or gay.
37. Posted by TXBlonde on January 26, 2006 01:23 AM
I don't get it as well - ok, she may be a good actress and whatnot (or not), but she's not a classic beauty by any means. Those breasts will be at the level of Drew B.'s in 10 years.
38. Posted by escapevelocity on January 26, 2006 01:48 AM
#15: McCarthy at least has a bit of er... substance. (whoa did i just say that?) i think i meant to say she at least has a sense of humor. at least she has one thing (if not three things *winkwink*) going for her.
39. Posted by DURound on January 26, 2006 02:12 AM
Perhaps she is Bhuddist. You know... get rid of all those desires in life?
After getting almost no screen time in the last 4 to 10 years she finally gets a role on TV that might possibly revitalize her career ... and she shows her superiority over all that by doing the one thing that would signal to the world she does not really take herself or her career seriously. Sure... give your career the finger and go to nirvanna, cause after all, the desire for success was holding you back....
You gotta admire that kind of dedicated spirituality.
40. Posted by Buck Rogers on January 26, 2006 02:22 AM
Eh, hasn't she tried this with Maxim and, to a lesser degree, GQ? I don't think getting sexier/sluttier photos in circulation will really help.
Try lending your 'name" to a couple of edgie indie films or do the Travolta revitalization method and grab some nice juicy niche, supporting parts and act the hell out of them. That worked for the late John Ritter. Not that I don't want to see her splendids, but they might not be what we're expecting as was noted, this isn't 1997 any more.
something like this is likely: http://img299.imageshack.us/my.php?image=341251043jenniferlovehewittsee1.jpg
41. Posted by sumeet on January 26, 2006 03:58 AM
She is gorgeous, but honestly, I'd rather see her in more movies than see her boobs.
42. Posted by DiamondStudded on January 26, 2006 04:39 AM
What is wrong with wholesome roles? Someone needs to come along and set a GOOD example for the young girls that actually look up to these people.
43. Posted by Shaun on January 26, 2006 05:01 AM
I think the Superficial said it right. That singing career ruined her. If she does a Playboy spread, I see Vivid Videos contacting her next.
44. Posted by adrock2xander on January 26, 2006 05:52 AM
All i see are horney, lonely men who cant score with a hooker givin one of Hollywood's hottest B-list actress grief...
There's nothin wrong with wholesome roles...at the very least she's earnin *insert extravagant amount here* for every dodgy movie/one off tv series/craptapcular single she appears in...
Cant say for the most of you...
45. Posted by Zapp Brannigan on January 26, 2006 05:53 AM
Re: Buck Rogers' link
Is that real or Photoshop?
But then, if it was Photoshop, why would the Photoshopper put in such ugly breasts?
46. Posted by boo on January 26, 2006 07:51 AM
so i just told the hubby about this, who suddenly got a faraway look in his eyes like he can already picture her nekked boobs, and i said, "Hey! someone else noticed the weird-hair-possible-wig thing" and he said, "She has hair?"
47. Posted by popcornsuite on January 26, 2006 08:14 AM
Maybe she would be taken more seriously as an actress if she could....oh I don't know...
...act?
48. Posted by SuperSpence on January 26, 2006 09:19 AM
I'd cut off my nutsack to see JLH in Playboy, but I think I'd need that nutsack the moment I opened the mag.
49. Posted by SuperSpence on January 26, 2006 09:21 AM
That image of JLH in a see-thru top is obviously fake because if it was real she'd be surrounded by dozens of dead men and me, with a bloody butcher's knife in my hand, climbing over the corpses.
50. Posted by julema on January 26, 2006 09:36 AM
I never saw her as a hot girl...strange chin, ugly smile... but her body is ok and it will look different to see natural breast in playboy!!! Don't need to have pretty face to pose in playboy! Need a good photograph, good make up artist, photoshop, and normally, implants!! Anyway, no actress can be taking seriously posing for playboy...
51. Posted by Monkey on January 26, 2006 10:13 AM
I'd buy it.
52. Posted by careylicious on January 26, 2006 10:19 AM
I'm not saying she's the hottest chick on the planet, but I'd watch her masterbate. Or help her, even.
53. Posted by ESQ on January 26, 2006 11:00 AM
"I wanna see your kitty and a little bit of titty."
54. Posted by LoneWolf on January 26, 2006 11:01 AM
I'd be curious to see her nekkid (they're real) but it ain't going to happen. Ghost Whisperer is the best career move she's taken and she's not going to lose her fan base from there by posing in Playboy. And even if she did, it'd be so airbrushed you wouldn't be able to tell it was her. There pictorials are increasingly beginning to look like mannequins, not people.
55. Posted by ESQ on January 26, 2006 11:08 AM
To Jennifer Love Hewitt
"But you can call me Daddy instead"
56. Posted by Spindoc on January 26, 2006 11:54 AM
As far as rating her carrer goes, she's still doing ok, I mean Tara Reid would be lucky of Hustler or Swank offered her a pictorial. That said, the excuse of "I always get offered Wholesome Roles" sounds kinda dumb considering she played a money grubbing dirtbag in Heartbreakers. But you know, publicists gotta say what they're told.
57. Posted by Badass on January 26, 2006 12:35 PM
seems like when any woman's career is waning, she'll turn to playboy to pull her sinking career out of the toilet. she just sucks, but she does have good boobs.
58. Posted by myspoonistoobig on January 26, 2006 12:55 PM
From an ESPN article published online earlier this week in response to a rumor about Emily's Reasons Why Not being cancelled:
But I'm glad you brought this up, because I think the Shannon Elizabeth Corollary applies here: Any time a smoking-hot actress gets naked early in her career, and that nakedness was pretty much the only reason they became famous (like Graham as Rollergirl), then it's only a matter of time before their career goes in the tank. It's almost like there's an expiration date, like with a carton of milk. Look at Shannon Elizabeth after "American Pie" -- where could she possibly go from there? We've already seen her naked and she's a mediocre actress. What's left? Same with Denise Richards in "Wild Things," or even Rebecca DeMornay in "Risky Business." Someone like Charlize Theron can avoid this fate because she can actually act. But if you can't act? You're done. That's why Jessica Alba was so smart not to get naked in "Into the Blue" -- now she can appear in three or four more movies before everyone realizes that she's a terrible actress. And then she'll get naked and that will be that.
(Note: This isn't related to the Sharon Stone Corollary, where a decent, sexy actress whom everyone always liked jump-starts her career with a famous nude scene or graphic sex scene, and then milks another five years and some paychecks out of the subsequent hullabaloo. Just look at what happened to Halle Berry after "Swordfish" and "Monster's Ball." Let's hope this becomes a trend.)
Further, I'll be looking forward to this issue, but I wouldn't get too worked up. It'll probably be like Shannon Whoreity's spreads (i.e. only topless).
59. Posted by Spindoc on January 26, 2006 01:55 PM
MySpoonIsTooBig, you left out the fact that Heather Graham entered the biz with a HUGE splash in that gigantic Blockbuster Licence to Drive Staring Corey Haim. She played the highly difficult and subtle role of "The hot chick".
60. Posted by Taelron on January 26, 2006 02:41 PM
Wait, only wholesome roles? From IMDB:
She Had Brains, a Body, and the Ability to Make Men Love Her (2006)
Plot: Jennifer Love Hewitt plays a young Odessa, Texas housewife and former homecoming queen who became one of the city's most popular hookers until she, her bordello sisters and 68 prominent Odessa residents were arrested in a scandal that shook Texas.
So wait, Young house wife. Ok I can see how thats wholesome... Former homecoming queen. Ok, still with you... A Popular hooker? How the hell is that wholesome... She's playing a street whore that gets arrested. Doesnt sound like a wholesome roll to me...
Havent seen her new show yet, but I find it ironic that the roll that made her famous, flopped when she tried to do a new TV show based off it...
61. Posted by HeeHaw on January 26, 2006 03:06 PM
She's not ugly, but she's not sexy either. She's always making goofy faces. She's like a weird throwback to Annette Funicello in the 1950s. And what's so sexy about that, you know? !
http://www.calfund.org/i/8_annettefunicello_1.jpg
62. Posted by Queen LaQueefah on January 26, 2006 03:16 PM
She's kind of like Michelle Branch and the color beige: fuckin' bland. She might be pretty and all, but watching her act is like looking at a tampon commercial, it kind of does nothing for me either way. She might as well not have even shown up to work and no-one would have EVER noticed.
63. Posted by Craig & "em" on January 26, 2006 03:38 PM
I seriously want to comment on this with my usual witty "I Luv Breast" banter, but I just can't stop looking at the picture of a "Clown" listed 2 articles below this one. Kudos to Superficial for doing entertainment news for the kids! God Bless their little clown loving souls!
64. Posted by data_b on January 26, 2006 03:50 PM
yah know yah waaaaaaannnnn it!
65. Posted by kw on January 26, 2006 10:51 PM
Wow that pic from #40 has GOT to be fake! Those are some really ugly cockeyed tits. I mean, what the heck? It can't be real, and if it is....YUCK!
66. Posted by Bo_Smith on January 27, 2006 04:54 AM
#20 well let's see Paris in a movie not this vapid bitch with no talent past her boobs.
67. Posted by aprincess on January 27, 2006 08:08 AM
I DOUBT this is going to happen! whoever said that doesn't sound like someone to be taken seriously. Ghost Whisper is doing very well, and those producers would NEVER let her do Playboy! It would Jepordize her career comeback! To big a risk for her to take at this point in time!
68. Posted by ibizagirl on January 27, 2006 10:38 AM
she looks like a horse. jennifer aniston also looks like a man/horse and people still say shes gorgeous. yuck.
69. Posted by BadGoat on January 27, 2006 11:56 PM
Stupid girl.
70. Posted by liljbabe85 on January 28, 2006 01:26 PM
Um... Ew.
71. Posted by starwatcher on January 28, 2006 05:14 PM
I followed a link from Ebay and found a HOT new photo of Jennifer Loves BOOBS<THEY ARE REAL!
www.dinodiamonds.com/who.com
72. Posted by a concerned fan on February 2, 2006 12:16 AM
Face it, if she doesn't pose, then the terrorists have won. I say...bring em' on. Her boobies that is.
73. Posted by akahuge on February 8, 2006 08:18 PM
bad idea.. career wise. Look at wholesome 'saved by the bell' girl Elizabeth Berkley and what flashing her nakedness in Showgirls did to turn her career around, I mean off.
But for just me personally, hell I'd love to see those boobies naked anytime... yummy
74. Posted by amajean040904 on February 9, 2006 01:11 AM
specking from a women's point of view, (most) women are cynical prudes, and are vary jealous of a women as radiant as Jenn. she does not look like a man or a horse, she Downs not ware a wig and id love to see her pose in playboy.
75. Posted by jackknife on February 9, 2006 02:40 PM
1. She is smokin' HOT!! 2. It has been a long time coming. 3. the spread will probably be little more than a 3-4 page tease (more leg-n-thigh than T-n-A) 4. I'll probably buy it (see point 1.)
76. Posted by A Nobody on February 15, 2006 11:53 AM
What's the point of seeing her naked? Don't people have imaginations anymore!
77. Posted by amajean040904 on February 18, 2006 01:44 AM
who needs an imagination when you can see the real thing