Angelina Jolie wants one of those Slumdog kids

March 31st, 2009 // 78 Comments

Angelina Jolie is apparently looking to adopt a child from India. That is if those kids from Slumdog Millionaire count as credible sources. All I know is one of them told me Ganesh could kick Spider-man’s ass, so obviously, I think they’re buttfaces who like to see a grown man cry. The Sun reports:

AZHARUDDIN MOHAMMED, ten, asked the actress at last month’s Oscars if she planned to bring up an Indian orphan.
Angelina is said to have replied: “Well, I’ll let you into a little secret, we will soon.”
She met Azharuddin and RUBINA ALI, nine, backstage in Los Angeles after Slumdog won eight Oscars.
Onlookers said 33-year-old Angelina was very taken by the pair and chatted freely with them.

And if The Curious Case of Benjamin Button had won the Oscars, Angelina would want one of those age-reversing kids. Jesus, lady. Be an individual.

Photo: Getty
Adoption: Changing Lives of Parents and Children
International Adoption Law | International laws
Wilde Adoption Update: We’re Expecting!
... adoption & to raise money for organizations that mak e adoption
Girlfriend's adoption challenged in court
PALM BEACH, Fla., Feb. 9 (UPI) -- The children of a wealthy polo mogul have filed a civil suit challenging the adoption of his 42-year-old girlfriend, attorneys say. John Goodman claims he recently adopted girlfriend Heather Anne Hutchins as a ...
Adoption ‘conscience clause’ clears Va. Senate, would allow faith-based adoption agencies to reject gay parents
The Virginia Senate voted Thursday for a bill to allow private adoption and foster-care agencies to turn away parents for reasons of religious faith or sexual orientation. Passage of the “conscience clause” bill, by a 22-18 vote, was ...

Comments (78)

  1. mamamiasweetpeaches | March 31, 2009 at 10:26 am

    Its never a Mexican!

    Reply
  2. that one | March 31, 2009 at 10:28 am

    how the hell does she keep track of all these runts?

    Reply
  3. Mr. Jones | March 31, 2009 at 10:29 am

    She’s trying to collect all these “divese” kids so she can open up her own “It’s a Small World” ride.

    Christ, now I can’t get that song out of my head…

    Reply
  4. RichPort's Ghost | March 31, 2009 at 10:31 am

    Every time a hypodermic sees her veiny arm, another poppy fairy gets its wings…

    Reply
  5. Jrz | March 31, 2009 at 10:31 am

    Can it be a one-legged kid this time?

    Reply
  6. Ash Gobindram | March 31, 2009 at 10:32 am

    Ganesh would kick spiderman’s ass considering you are bringing a religious figure down to the level of a comic book hero. Im not so sure about Jesus up against The Hulk though, might give him a run for his money.

    Reply
  7. Rough Daddy | March 31, 2009 at 10:32 am

    Cant Brad bang the babysitter already…

    Reply
  8. havoc | March 31, 2009 at 10:36 am

    I smell a new tattoo with coordinates! Woohoo…..

    SXSW baby!

    .

    Reply
  9. http://www.popduds.com | March 31, 2009 at 10:37 am

    Why don’t celebrities ever adopt American children?

    Reply
  10. Jrz | March 31, 2009 at 10:38 am

    I hope she picks an undernourished Indian senior citizen who is the size of a 4 year old instead of an acutal toddler. Hee…that’ll show her.

    Reply
  11. Jrz | March 31, 2009 at 10:40 am

    #9–Because no adoption agency in the US in their right minds would ever give these fucking narcissistic, irresponsible fuck-ups a child. The countries that are like, PHEW! THANK GOD ONE LESS MOUTH TO FEED

    Reply
  12. Mr. Jones | March 31, 2009 at 10:40 am

    We should start taking bets on what kind of kid she is going to pick up next.

    My money’s on Eskimo.

    Reply
  13. Jrz | March 31, 2009 at 10:43 am

    Okay….that posted before I clicked on submit. anyhoo……here’s what I wanted to say:
    #9–Because no adoption agency in the US in their right minds would ever give these fucking narcissistic, irresponsible fuck-ups a child. The countries that are like, PHEW! THANK GOD ONE LESS MOUTH TO FEED are relieved to get rid of kids. They figure, well, better some brother-kissing, self-mutilating asshole raise this kid than it living in the gutter and dying of cholera.

    Reply
  14. Rhialto | March 31, 2009 at 10:46 am

    Wow! Is Angelina Jolie getting insane or something!?

    Reply
  15. Gando | March 31, 2009 at 10:48 am

    Do the other kids like to be a piece of her collection!?

    Reply
  16. Nero | March 31, 2009 at 10:56 am

    It won’t be long till her kids have a bar-code tattood on their arms!

    Reply
  17. ghost | March 31, 2009 at 10:58 am

    Seems like Mia Farrow did all this first. I’ve got no problem with Angelina adopting again. I really hate to see another kid in Madonna’s sinewy clutches, though. No kid deserves that.

    Reply
  18. Zanna | March 31, 2009 at 11:00 am

    There is a joke about a Hindon’t, a 7-11 and a slurpee and possibly curry but I can’t make it work. JRZ?

    Reply
  19. Sauron | March 31, 2009 at 11:01 am

    Yes hun,ofcourse hun! Do i hear Brad Pitt talking!?

    Reply
  20. RichPort's Ghost | March 31, 2009 at 11:07 am

    #18 – Ask Joe Biden.. he has all the best 7-11 jokes.

    Reply
  21. Jrzmommy | March 31, 2009 at 11:12 am

    Ok, that posted before I clicked submit, too. This is what I wanted to say:

    I am a fucking narcissistic, irresponsible fuck-up.

    Reply
  22. debra | March 31, 2009 at 11:21 am

    Angelina has always said that she wanted to adopt children from around the world. She has said this in her early twenties. So all the flack is uncalled for. This is not something new. She has always been consistent. The only change is she has had three bio children after falling in love with Brad. Brad also..has always said that he wanted a big family. He once said if he did it he would do it big. So he has met someone who shares the same desire. There is nothing wrong with giving children without a home a place. Perhaps they will also adopt when they get older. That should be praised. To those who criticize about them not adopting in the states. Some of you should do it. Stop pointing fingers and look at yourself. And the bottom line is it is no one business..

    Reply
  23. Dr Phowstus | March 31, 2009 at 11:25 am

    @21 (puts on glasses, ahem) Your knowledge of past monikers rivals your douchiness, but not by much. I shall assume that your envy is a result of countless attempts at humorous musings which have fallen flat, like an errantly flipped pancake on a greasy diner floor. The main qualities your hurriedly typed posts reveal are paranoia and self-loathing, but there is a smattering of assholishness as well, making you likely a penis samurai or bloated aquatic artic mammal. In closing, I shall grasp my genitalia firmly (grabs nuts), and issue you a hardy center digit (flips bird).

    (takes off glasses, chugs beer)

    Reply
  24. @ 22 | March 31, 2009 at 11:27 am

    Yeah, Mangelina has always been consistent… especially the part about not ho-ing around with married men…

    Reply
  25. mark | March 31, 2009 at 11:37 am

    Angelina, stand on your head and I’ll shoot some slumdog on your privates.

    Reply
  26. TDizzle | March 31, 2009 at 11:41 am

    Message to ANGELINA:
    The Oscars were not meant to be shopping malls for children from all over the world. Backstage is not a shelf where you can put a little Indian child in your shopping cart.
    She needs to stop doing that…. Everywhere she shows up she adopts a child. It is not like a child is enhancing the interior design of her house

    Reply
  27. Alfalfa | March 31, 2009 at 11:43 am

    They are not her children, she is only financially responsible for them. She does not raise them, the hired nannies do that. .

    Reply
  28. GuyHolly | March 31, 2009 at 11:47 am

    #23 Hahahaha..Bravo Dr. It could be a Barney Rubble wannabe also.

    Reply
  29. GuyHolly | March 31, 2009 at 11:54 am

    Never forget the pUnk. or you’ll get alot of gawd, and pUnk outs, and I’m leaving!! No this time it’s for real……………

    Reply
  30. Joe | March 31, 2009 at 12:08 pm

    India is soo in. When i first saw Slumdog I thought to myself, “my wife would love one of those kids, they go great with the rosewood.”

    Reply
  31. Jrzmommy | March 31, 2009 at 12:11 pm

    @23

    I think the word that you were searching for was “arctic.”

    That was not a typo, was it?

    Reply
  32. Angelina Fan | March 31, 2009 at 12:19 pm

    Wow. I’m sure he/she’ll be an adorable addition.

    Reply
  33. GuyHolly | March 31, 2009 at 12:20 pm

    @31–no.no I think the word was douchebag.

    Reply
  34. Dr Phowstus | March 31, 2009 at 12:22 pm

    @31 (puts on glasses) My good sir, you oddly dismiss fabricated words like assholishness, which you clearly personify. I often, as a controlled experiment, omit particular letters to ensure my antagonist is fully aware of my text in its entirety. Your discovery of an absent “c” is admirable, but in no way dilutes my original declaration. Read losely and you will see that I just alled you a unt.

    (removes glasses, belches)

    Reply
  35. Mark Fuhrman | March 31, 2009 at 12:24 pm

    I’m not racist or anything, but christalmighty that house is gonna have the worst Third World stench imaginable.

    Reply
  36. jrz | March 31, 2009 at 12:29 pm

    forgot:
    Because no adoption agency in the US in their right minds would ever give these fucking narcissistic, irresponsible fuck-ups a child. The countries that are like, PHEW! THANK GOD ONE LESS MOUTH TO FEED are relieved to get rid of kids. They figure, well, better some brother-kissing, self-mutilating asshole raise this kid than it living in the gutter and dying of cholera.
    in bed.

    Reply
  37. Adam | March 31, 2009 at 12:33 pm

    I don’t understand why the U.S. allows this?

    You can just just go abroad and take a kid and it’s as simple as that to become a citizen here with all the rights and protections? It makes no sense.

    Reply
  38. Dr Phowstus | March 31, 2009 at 12:33 pm

    @31

    …and you are correct, of course. I had no idea the word is “arctic”. I apologize.

    Reply
  39. Jrz | March 31, 2009 at 12:38 pm

    The Jolie-Pitt kids can play Hide n Sikh

    Reply
  40. RichPort's Ghost | March 31, 2009 at 12:45 pm

    Jrz, I think they’ll play Hide the Sikh… in the dryer. I see little Maddux in cuffs, the result of an “accidental” suffocation…

    Reply
  41. Jrzmommy | March 31, 2009 at 12:47 pm

    @38

    Thanks, Dr Phowstus, it is big of you to admit it. I’m sure that it was difficult to confess that you made a mistake that most second graders would not commit.

    You may not be such a moron after all!

    Reply
  42. Monkey's Bone | March 31, 2009 at 12:48 pm

    Jeezus – she has 6 little wannabe- slumdogs NOW.
    At least she dresses them like slumdogs

    Reply
  43. RichPort's Ghost | March 31, 2009 at 12:52 pm

    Really, is the troll arguing with itself?

    Reply
  44. Jrz | March 31, 2009 at 12:59 pm

    Rich, Someone’s a little agitated lately…..wonder what could be going on…..

    Reply
  45. Jrzmommy | March 31, 2009 at 1:01 pm

    Hey Dr (RichPort’s Ghost) Phowstus –

    Thanks for playing, but I’ve got to go. I just pooped my pants.

    See you soon!

    Reply
  46. R is for Retarded | March 31, 2009 at 1:05 pm

    Guess you have the Bells in your sphincter too Wall— I mean Jrzmommy.

    Reply
  47. RichPort's Ghost | March 31, 2009 at 1:19 pm

    Jrz, I’d say I’m confused, but then how do I explain all these empty liquor bottles?

    Reply
  48. p | March 31, 2009 at 1:28 pm

    @ Mark Fuhrman – nope you’re definitely a racist douchebag.

    Reply
  49. cavy | March 31, 2009 at 1:50 pm

    Octo-Jolie-Pitt

    Reply
  50. GuyHolly | March 31, 2009 at 1:57 pm

    You know what’s sad is the troll probably has no clue he’s arguing with himself.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Name (Visible)
Email (Required, Not Visible)