April 07, 2006
Britney Spears statue still totally disgusting

Wondering what the Britney Spears birthing monument looks like from the back? Of course not, but here it is anyways. I wasn't sure if this was considered safe for work or not, but I figured it'd be alright considering it's just stone. But, uh, if all of you end up getting fired it's not my fault. Blame Britney Spears and her horribly disgusting vagina.
Previous Entries
» Kate Moss and Pete Doherty to marry» Paula Abdul got beat up
» Eva Longoria is the biggest cover ever
» Heather Locklear and David Spade might be dating
» Rosie O'Donnell challenges Naomi Campbell


Comments
1. Posted by jjgm21 on April 7, 2006 11:01 AM
#1. woot.
I was hoping for a little more detail in her hoo-hah, maybe some vagsticles or something.
2. Posted by CheekyChops on April 7, 2006 11:02 AM
FUCK SAKE!
3. Posted by brooke5301 on April 7, 2006 11:03 AM
OMG... MY EYES, MY EYES!!!!!!
4. Posted by Blaze on April 7, 2006 11:04 AM
Oh I'm in love!!
She cracks me up! She doesn't care what you or I think about her! hahah she lives her life exactly how she wants!
So did she give birth on all fours?
5. Posted by tits_on_snack on April 7, 2006 11:04 AM
well now.
6. Posted by PostmanR on April 7, 2006 11:06 AM
Is that an alien head I see popping out of there?
7. Posted by honeycomb's_big_yeahyeahyeah on April 7, 2006 11:07 AM
This makes me wish I was dead.
8. Posted by oshkoshb-goshdammgosh on April 7, 2006 11:08 AM
The Miracle of Life! The Miracle of Life! I think the statue should be made into fountain, and the liquid of the fountain should be Vault soda, spraying out of her taut vagina and pert nipples. And we should put it in Central Park and not expect it to be vandalized or made love to by hobos.
9. Posted by playahater101 on April 7, 2006 11:09 AM
That is so fucking gross. Just disturbing. I don't know what else to say. I am ready to throw up.
10. Posted by jugsgirl on April 7, 2006 11:12 AM
thats not brits statue. it tomkat giving birth. Congratulations its a whiny bitch.
11. Posted by PandoraKnight on April 7, 2006 11:13 AM
I will never get that image out of my head- I must share it with everyone I know. Right after I rip out my ovaries.
12. Posted by Warrior on April 7, 2006 11:13 AM
Thank goodness I don't eat breakfast.
13. Posted by playahater101 on April 7, 2006 11:16 AM
#4, she had a c-section. So that statue makes no sense. It should be more realistic and show her screaming and crying like every other woman in the world. Except Scientologists. I hope Kaite Holes sees this and thinks being quiet isn't going to be easy. Especially with a humn being forcing it's way out of your vagina.
14. Posted by shoof on April 7, 2006 11:18 AM
WTF?!?!?! The "artist" should be thrown in a mental institution. First of all, who gives birth like that? Is she a dog? Well, dont answer that.....
And what is up with her ass? I can't even put it into words...I mean...the shape...WTF is up with that? WHAT THE FUCK!?!?!? I'm going to throw up now.
15. Posted by Darby on April 7, 2006 11:19 AM
If I was Britney Spears and they used me for a prolife statue like this without my permission I would be livid!! That statue is discusting and offensive and the 'artist' is only getting the work shown cause it is supposedly Britney giving birth. I'm sure she was never in this position during birth and I'm sure she took every drug available to her. I don't know but everytime I see this monstosity I get mad.
16. Posted by PapaHotNuts on April 7, 2006 11:19 AM
I'd hit it.
With an uppercut, then a body shot, a right hook, then come back with another uppercut.
I wish I had Alzheimer's so I could forget about this in a few minutes like my grandma used to do.
17. Posted by Vampyreska on April 7, 2006 11:20 AM
WTF??? Britney had a C-SECTION! The statue is factually incorrect!
18. Posted by Foxbase Alpha on April 7, 2006 11:26 AM
Did she really model for this?
19. Posted by imabeeatch on April 7, 2006 11:28 AM
Britney should pull a Tom Cruise on this artist and sue his fucking ass off. She'll get more money that K-fag will end up taking to give to Tom Cruise to blow his itsy bitsy teeny weeny. That has got to be one of the most disgusting and disturbing things I have ever seen in my life and now it is imprinted on my brain. OMG! I think I'm going to have an aneurism.
20. Posted by BigJim on April 7, 2006 11:30 AM
So much to say about this...
-Tom Cruise could birth that out his ass without breaking a sweat, cuz everyone knows, TOM LOVES THE COCK! (Meaning his ass is well stretched, in case you didn't get that)
-Rosemary called, she wants her baby back.
-Are those Ben Wa balls I see sticking out of her ass?
-This reminds me of a scene from the movie Aliens. Where's Sigourney Weaver when you need her?
-And finally... MY EYES! MY EYES!
21. Posted by flamarkel on April 7, 2006 11:31 AM
That kid will be so proud of this work of art in about, say, 13 years. Maury already has the show booked: "Teens Whose Mothers Allowed Their Births to be Hideously Recreated in Public Art Displays."
22. Posted by Dr.Rokter on April 7, 2006 11:34 AM
There's an old man that runs a Bookmobile across from the playground at my school. He gives us books with pictures of grownups that don't always like to wear their clothing. Last week, he told me where babies came from, but he sure didn't mention anything like this
23. Posted by mamaE on April 7, 2006 11:39 AM
NEWS FLASH! This artist is an idiot. Brit had an elective c-section, which means she chose to have her stomach cut open, which is far more disturbing than a baby coming out of a vagina, which is where it is supposed to. You people are wimps! most of you, and the vast majority of the billions of people on this planet, came out your mama's vag. and many women give birth on all fours--we actually are animals you know! its sad that so many people are scared by birth--its actually can be the most empowering experience in a woman's life. interesting how its okay to look at a woman shoving a 12-inch dildo in her poonan and a massive buttplug in her rectum, but babies being born--oh, the horror!
you all need to get out and live a little!
24. Posted by Elizabeth on April 7, 2006 11:41 AM
this is the sickest monument statue i have ever seen. the end.
25. Posted by playahater101 on April 7, 2006 11:43 AM
#18, no the psycho, I mean artist said she had no idea he was doing this statue. Can you imagine her posing for it? And I agree. Giving birth like that is virtually impossible. You need a little bit of gravity to help you out.
26. Posted by Dr.Rokter on April 7, 2006 11:44 AM
#23
THAT'S how I was born?! Jesus, no wonder I'm so fucked up...
27. Posted by hendero on April 7, 2006 11:46 AM
actually, I think the artist is pretty clever. He's getting way more publicity than if he made a statue of President Bush or the Duke of New York.
28. Posted by Jewbacca on April 7, 2006 11:46 AM
It could be the artists concept of what Britney would look like having a partial birth abortion.
29. Posted by Becca on April 7, 2006 11:47 AM
Oh my God that is so hilarious beyond words.
30. Posted by Sweet_cheeks on April 7, 2006 11:48 AM
#23 and this is coming from a mother, NO ONE wants to see someone else give birth. a child's birth is only special to the people who helped create it ( mother, father) but just because it's special to them, does not mean everyone else want to see a pussy push out a watermelon. and yes, it is horrid, even to the people who get out and live a little.
and btw, don't go dissing on c-sections just because maybe you popped out your kids through your vagina. Plenty of kids come out with brain damages from oxygen loss, and a whole slew of birth defects because of a hard childbirth. just because someone has a c-section, or elects to have a c-section doesn't make them less of a mother. they still carried the kid for 9 months and will have to go through everything all mothers go through.
you're not more of a mother just because you popped it out of your vagina.
and no, i did not have elective c-section.
31. Posted by oshkoshb-goshdammgosh on April 7, 2006 11:54 AM
I don't like watching anything give birth, or pooping, or vomiting, or eating something that is still alive. These are all natural things, and I don't like watching them because they are gross. Ass-plugs and dildos, however, are a thing of beauty.
And, no, I've never had a baby.
32. Posted by Redeemer on April 7, 2006 11:55 AM
BLUE 42, BLUE 42!!!
SET!!! HUT,HUT...HIKE!!!
33. Posted by Wild Rose on April 7, 2006 11:55 AM
Nobody should be commenting on Britney's participation in this monstrosity that is a product of a demented fuckwit and will be going on public display this month. I hope her lawyers manage to wipe the smirk off the pretentious son-of-a-bitch's face, and if that doesn't work I hope she hires some goons to break all his fingers so he is unable to produce another piece of shit like this ever again. If there's nothing I hate more than a vacuous media-whore, it's publicity-seeking leeches who use her name and image to promote an otherwise mediocre and offensive piece of art. And then to go even further and proclaim it celebrates birth and is a monument to the Pro-life movement. Shiiiitttt, they covered all the bases, didn't they?
34. Posted by LoneWolf on April 7, 2006 12:01 PM
My life is complete.
Thanks, Superfish.
35. Posted by Italian Stallion on April 7, 2006 12:07 PM
It looks like she is laying eggs for Easter, I still don't see Waldo though, he hid really good this time.......
36. Posted by Busylittlebee on April 7, 2006 12:11 PM
This looks like the work of Jeff Koons - just needs a splash of paint!
37. Posted by Akapee on April 7, 2006 12:12 PM
I didn't know Britney had testicles and fat short dick. That sculptor needs to take a class on imagination. Wow!!
38. Posted by Lala on April 7, 2006 12:13 PM
#33 Her lawyers are probably sitting on this per her instructions. Then when the furor dies out, that's when they will strike, thereby landing her further tabloid inches. Because lately, the only reason she's in the news is because of that miserable excuse for a husband she has, so she's got to milk this for all its worth.
39. Posted by whackjob on April 7, 2006 12:16 PM
wondered how long it would take to see the back side of this after the original posting...now I know.
the horror.
the horror.
#23 STFU. SweetCheeks nails it. (says father of 3)
40. Posted by em167 on April 7, 2006 12:18 PM
#23 - you're an idiot
#30 - THANK YOU!!!! I had to have a c-section, and if anything, having a c-section takes more guts than a vaginal birth. Other women I know who had their babies naturally were up walking about the next day, whereas if you have a c-section, you're walking doubled over for at least 1 to 2 weeks, and still hurting 6 weeks later (usually). #23, just because your babies came out of your vagina doesn't mean those of us who had c-sections aren't as good as mothers as you.
As far as that statue is concerned, that artist is a moron. She never pushed, was probably never even in labor. Next time you want to spend all that time on a statue, make sure you've got your facts straight first, retard.
41. Posted by playahater101 on April 7, 2006 12:20 PM
#23, I gotta agree with #30 on this. I have had 2 kids and that is just disturbing. No one wants to see a head crowning. As beautiful a thing as child birth is, at the same time it looks horribly painful and alien. One of my kids I had natural and the other was a c-section b/c the baby was breech. So don't go and put down people who have had c-sections. Most c-sections are necessary for the health of the baby and the mother. Having your stomach cut open is no picnic either.
42. Posted by Kenton on April 7, 2006 12:27 PM
Ok ok... What's with the bear head?
43. Posted by Allie D. on April 7, 2006 12:27 PM
I do not believe #23 was necessarily dissing c-sections, but trying to make a point that what the statue was trying to represent wasn't exactly unnatural. And face it- c-sections are not natural. They are just common. I've had 2 of them myself and I would have overwhelmingly preferred to have natural childbirth. But that's me. No one is "more" of a hero because they did one over the other.
Secondly to whomever wasn't sure that women gave birth on all fours- many women do. It is a more natural position that allows gravity to aid in the baby exiting instead of the women pushing too hard, resulting in tearing.
44. Posted by Ms Crackalackin on April 7, 2006 12:29 PM
Just think, that'll be Angelina Jolie in about a month! Unless, of course, she too is "too posh to push." That baby coming out of her is not gross. What's gross is thinking about what's been going INTO it, not what's coming out, IMHO.
45. Posted by mamadough on April 7, 2006 12:29 PM
just for the hell of it, i took a totally different view of this. you ever heard how some whores do a ping-pong trick with their poonanie? well, that's exactly what Brit is doing, except with a croquet ball. ew.
46. Posted by kate_possible on April 7, 2006 12:29 PM
it kinda of looks like an upside-down dick
47. Posted by Spindoc on April 7, 2006 12:30 PM
I hate to say it, but is just looks like she is constipated and dropping a HUGE load.
48. Posted by sweetcheeks on April 7, 2006 12:37 PM
Did Spears commission this? Because I imagine there's lots more where that came from. Britney taking a dump, Britney popping a zit, Britney shaving her armpits, etc, etc.
I can only hope this is the first of MANY in the series.
49. Posted by dimestoredetective on April 7, 2006 12:38 PM
Well, I remember when Britney dressed like a cute innocent schoolgirl. Now it looks like she's had a full vaginal blowout.
50. Posted by Mr. Fritz on April 7, 2006 12:39 PM
Ugh, this reminds me of when my dog gave birth to a litter of 6 puppies. They should use this statue as a form of birth control to warn girls of the danger of fucking a douchebag.
51. Posted by sweetcheeks on April 7, 2006 12:41 PM
Before anyone gets frothy about my lumping the miracle of life in with zit-popping and taking a dump, let me say this:
Yes, birth IS a miracle. But it's also very, VERY ugly. And mucousy and bloody and smelly. It is HAS to be this way so that the father of the child will be horrified by your vagina for two or three months, thereby giving it time to heal. It's God's divine plan to salvage your hoo-ha after such a beating.
52. Posted by PocketRocket on April 7, 2006 12:41 PM
I can't see it clearly, so I'll ask: How detailed is the chisling of Big Britney's Stink Star?
BTW Tom Cruise Loves the Cock
53. Posted by gsprescueguy on April 7, 2006 12:44 PM
Well, in an attempt to bring a postive light to this very disturbing subject......
....at least it's not __________ (please feel free to fill in your own)
Mine is "Rosanne Barr".
54. Posted by Grphdesi23 on April 7, 2006 12:49 PM
Is that Britney giving birth or taking a big shit?
Get the Enema, Nurse! Enema!
55. Posted by playahater101 on April 7, 2006 12:49 PM
#43, I gotta say that I had both (first natural, second c-section) and I actually prefer the c-section. After 21 hours of labor and 3 hours of pushing, the 1/2 hour c-section was a lot easier. But after a natural birth you are more mobile. I understand that what the statue is depicting is natural and the way it should be but some people don't see it that way. And no one should be made to feel bad about having a c-section. Any person who loves and cares for their kids and puts them first, no matter how they came into this world, should be commended. Mothers rule!!
But that statue is just freaky. I don't get the bear head either. I wonder what Brit thinks of it. I know I wouldn't want an anatomically correct naked statue of me giving birth on display.
56. Posted by happygardeningmama on April 7, 2006 12:50 PM
First of all--vaginas and the birth process are not disgusting. The wacko who was going to make an in home erotic statue who got caught and had to turn it into a "monument" (wasn't that your great description?)--that person is disgusting! The weirdest statue I've ever seen for sure, but birth rocks and moms rock. Take your issues about womens' bodies to your next counselling session, ok?
57. Posted by sometimesboy on April 7, 2006 12:50 PM
i thought this was supposed to be a picture of the rear side of the statue...all i see is another slack jawed picture of that goofy twat...oh, wait, i see it now...it's the same forward as it is backward.... this is one of them there palindromes...fancy...
58. Posted by playahater101 on April 7, 2006 12:52 PM
#53, At least it's not Rosie O'Donnell. YIKES!!!!!
59. Posted by OhHowCynical on April 7, 2006 12:55 PM
Omigod! That is so nasty! I'm going to have nightmares....
60. Posted by CoJo on April 7, 2006 01:03 PM
Maybe I'm just in a strange state of mind this morning, but from that angle it looks like a sculpture of a huge clitoris.
This artist is a joke. C-section or no c-section...this is the worst sculpture I've ever seen...even if it wasn't supposed to be Britney Spears...it still would suck.
61. Posted by discreet_chaos on April 7, 2006 01:05 PM
The statue doesn't even remotely look like Britney and it isn't based on any kind of fact. This whole thing is just a publicity stunt by some dude, but I'm sorry kids, but this is what giving birth actually looks like...
62. Posted by hutelihut on April 7, 2006 01:16 PM
Every teenager on the planet should see this. Best birth control ever. This has to be the worst piece of art ever. The "goldfish in blender" piece was less disturbing.
63. Posted by Meesha on April 7, 2006 01:17 PM
Correct me if im wrong...didnt Britt have a C-section-- whats with this disgusting display?
64. Posted by YapYapYap on April 7, 2006 01:20 PM
Y'all sure this isn't about the birth of Baby Xenu? Or just the result of an overenthusiastic J Sister prior to Brit's posing session? Newborn babies have HAIR.
(even the ones that are cut out)
However, is it still for sale?
It would go so well next to my other favorite statue:
http://vilesilencer.com/europe/casarosso.jpg
The balls actually roll around in the happy splatter of the - rather watery - cum.
Now you know why Tom Cruise loves Amsterdam!
65. Posted by Feed_Me_Chocolate on April 7, 2006 01:22 PM
YES, PEOPLE, ONCE AND FOR ALL, SHE DID HAVE A C-SECTION. SHE DID NOT GIVE VAGINAL BIRTH.
BTW, it looks like she has one enormous ball.
P.S. That's the stupidest postion to give birth.
66. Posted by bafongu on April 7, 2006 01:26 PM
The birth of PoPoZao ? It certainly is coming out the right end...
67. Posted by imabeeatch on April 7, 2006 01:29 PM
A good candidate for retroactive birth control.
68. Posted by Erienne on April 7, 2006 01:31 PM
PopoHomo is more like it #66. Anything with K-Fed's genes is fucked for life.
#60-I agree-I do see a clitoris in there....that or baby Sean had a bird beak that was removed at birth.
About the making of the statue: Who the fuck does this?!? Must be some dead beat sculptor who needed a promo piece for his career and he chose this bitch. What a bloody moron.
69. Posted by ermine on April 7, 2006 01:34 PM
Is that a cheeto?
70. Posted by lindsey mitchell on April 7, 2006 01:40 PM
I could have gone my entire life without seeing Britney's stone labia.
71. Posted by that-dog-is-shifty-eyed on April 7, 2006 01:45 PM
Naturally all births shall take place on all fours on a bear skin rug. "Bitch, I don't wanna see no stains on my rug now, ya hear? Bitch, I'm talking to you!" (see, it's Samuel L. Jacksons rug)
72. Posted by Craig & "em" on April 7, 2006 01:47 PM
I'd Hit It!
73. Posted by Aimtrue on April 7, 2006 01:49 PM
I see K-Fed!!!!
74. Posted by TheHappyRobot on April 7, 2006 01:54 PM
i KNEW she shaved!!!
75. Posted by ProbablyTooOld on April 7, 2006 01:55 PM
#36, Busylittlebee? You took the words right out of my head.
Except that not even Koons gave the impression that his models had been shackled until their limbs broke. What the hell is up with the arms and legs on this insane bit of nastiness?
Sicker than Koons--that's an accomplishment. Pro-lifers must be proud!
76. Posted by Catscratch on April 7, 2006 01:56 PM
#1 People do give birth on all fours, but they aren't resting comfortably on their forearms. They are on their hands, pushing back. Go watch Baby Story reruns for a while on TLC. You'll see it done.
#2 I've had two C-sections and will be scheduled for #3 sometime next week. It sucks, but the doctor doesn't think my uterus can go through labour without rupturing. The point of birth is not to prove you are some sort of Uber-Mother-Goddess by going natural instead of a C-section, or having a drugless delivery instead of an epidural. The point of birth is to bring a happy, healthy baby into the world.
#3 The fact someone gives birth is a beautiful miracle. The actual birth process is messy, smelly, painful and not terribly pleasant as either spectator or participant.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I've got to go bleach my eyeballs.
77. Posted by meFailEnglish? on April 7, 2006 01:58 PM
It's looking at me...
78. Posted by that-dog-is-shifty-eyed on April 7, 2006 02:04 PM
Do you think Britney looks at this statue and thinks to herself "Aww shucks, shoulda, woulda, coulda!"
79. Posted by santori on April 7, 2006 02:12 PM
*loses mind*
80. Posted by SamiJenkins on April 7, 2006 02:16 PM
Even thought it seems like something she would do, Britney did not authorize this statue. The "artist" came up with the idea himself and even (ugh) had his children help him sculpt it. Which is worse, trying to imagine/sculpt what Britney's vag looks like during birth, or having some stranger publicize what he thinks your birthing vag looks like? Either way, his kids will speak of this in their future sessions.
81. Posted by Devil Is Chrome on April 7, 2006 02:30 PM
No - you guys - that's not the crown of a baby's head, that's the unbelievably bad case of vaginal warts the K-Fed gave her.
82. Posted by Jonboy in SF on April 7, 2006 02:32 PM
Thanks for posting this pic...now my life is complete. Yes, Brit's stone cold vadge completes me.
83. Posted by Quiggie on April 7, 2006 02:36 PM
#32 - That's classic! I love it!
84. Posted by WTF on April 7, 2006 02:51 PM
Im Sueing!
85. Posted by gogoboots on April 7, 2006 03:09 PM
Ugh, this is so disgusting why do you have to remind us that someone actually took their time to make it!?!?
86. Posted by Laurie on April 7, 2006 03:23 PM
Keep in mind, this is the same "artist" that created the Ted William piece 'Death mask'. So things that are gross and not really appropriate are second nature to this guy.
http://www.firststreetgallery.net/show05-09.html
87. Posted by Midian on April 7, 2006 03:26 PM
At least she decided to shave a bit down there.
88. Posted by MeganHarris on April 7, 2006 03:40 PM
Have you guys seen the Artist who did it?
He's on Useless Things. Click on my name. Go and scroll down some.
89. Posted by downshine on April 7, 2006 03:48 PM
the thing that makes this really funny is the fact that Britney actually didnt give birth the normal way like millions of other women do. she had a pre-fucking-planned c-section b/c her mom told her it would "hurt". the artist who did this is just some loser britney obsessed wanker who is trying to glorify britney's pathetic skanky life.
90. Posted by Kylara on April 7, 2006 04:04 PM
C-Sections aren't the problem. I agree with #30 on that; they are very painful, it's invasive surgery (they're ripping a baby out through your stomach), and it just sucks.
The thing is, though, she didn't have a c-section for medical purposes. She scheduled exactly when she wanted that baby to be born and supposedly because she heard vaginal birth would be painful. Many doctors demand that a subsequent birth after one c-section also be a c-section, due to the large cut already on the uterus. Then many strongly recommend that you do not have more than two children because you've cut the uterus open twice, and, well, duh, it's not as strong as it used to be. Kind of like #76 and how your doctor's recommending you have a c-section for number three (good luck, btw).
If it's your first baby and there are no complications with it, it's better to do vaginal. Really. Not because it's some mother-earth thing, it's just healthier than heavily invasive surgery, and recovery is much, much easier.
As for that statue: I must've been some murderer-rapist of small children in my past life to deserve seeing this. X_x
91. Posted by Hara on April 7, 2006 04:32 PM
Rofl Oshkoch
Yep. This is pretty disturbing. As someone with an unoccupied uterus I find it even more so. Birth is wonderful I'm sure, but as Michael Jackson said (to Naomi Campbell) , "Keep it in the Closet". For some Tom Cruise's name popped into my head. It's like they're all connected...
Feeling an urge to go hug my mother.
Btw, #32 that's hilarious.
92. Posted by jennifer11 on April 7, 2006 04:37 PM
i just had an abortion in protest and i wasn't even pregnant.
*shudders*
93. Posted by dark on April 7, 2006 04:53 PM
Goatse 3D
94. Posted by pixel killya on April 7, 2006 05:21 PM
Britney deserves a statue LESS than anyone alive...or dead. Plus, ugly Britney giving birth to ugly K-Fed's child just HAS to be a whole lot of ugliness.
Boy that was ugly!
95. Posted by vavavoom on April 7, 2006 05:24 PM
I think that this is some type of cosmic justice considering Britney stole her baby's daddy from a women who was about to give birth to his child. This is for you Shar, laugh away...
96. Posted by Alia on April 7, 2006 05:37 PM
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
97. Posted by happygardeningmama on April 7, 2006 05:59 PM
For those who want to know--what's pictures is actually a viable birthing position, useful especially for the baby who is laying on its own cord or needs "turning" or is just plain stuck. Believe it or not, prior to turning birth into a medical disease, women gave birth in all kinds of positions, not just on their backs, feet in stirrups--in fact, historically that was the least likely position for a woman to give birth in!
The bear--well that's *totally* unique! Bizarre homage to the Grizzly man?
98. Posted by jb on April 7, 2006 06:29 PM
Why?Why?WHYYYYYYYYYYYY???????
99. Posted by andrewthezeppo on April 7, 2006 06:36 PM
I'm totally disgusted. How is this a pro-life monument? Is this like the time they made sculptures of Jesus out of feces?
100. Posted by andrewthezeppo on April 7, 2006 06:36 PM
100!
I'm kinda of a big deal.
101. Posted by mYslead on April 7, 2006 06:47 PM
my eyes are officially bleeding
102. Posted by Erienne on April 7, 2006 06:52 PM
You know what I just realized?
Isn't there normally two major holes down there? One of them is disgustingly exposed...but the other.....? Non-existent. Either 1) Her vagina is hiding in fear, 2) she's either emptying her bowels or Sean Preston really is a little shit, 3) she had it surgically removed, which woould explain the constipated pig faces in previous threads.
103. Posted by sirokai on April 7, 2006 07:38 PM
Looks like that cannon is about to fire! Watch out!
104. Posted by Trotter on April 7, 2006 08:32 PM
I am totally gay now.
105. Posted by BastardotheGreat on April 7, 2006 08:55 PM
That statue is awesome. For a follow up the artist should make the baby's head pop out fully facing the same way as the mother's face. Then he would have the mother stand on her hands so that the whole thing looks like a being with two heads, one at each end and legs for arms and arms for legs. The being could possibly poop on his head if not careful as well as drench his chin in peepee. This would be a most awesome work of art, lol.
106. Posted by Star Maker Machinery on April 7, 2006 08:59 PM
Why is she pooping out a salad bowl? The statue would have been better if she was turding out KFed's latest single.
107. Posted by gardeniagirl on April 7, 2006 09:05 PM
i ADORE C-sections, and the medications that go along with them. I had one necessary one, and one elective one, and there is NWIH that a VBAC would make me feel more womanly.Plus, less wear and tear on everyone.Weird sculpture for someone who HAD a c-section, though, esp if it was pre-scheduled.
108. Posted by gardeniagirl on April 7, 2006 09:09 PM
Good luck next week, Catscratch ; ) it will all be fine, i'm sure.
109. Posted by bunnyhugger on April 7, 2006 09:16 PM
# 35, italian stallion, HAHAHAHAHAHA! EASTER EGGS!!
great stuff, man!
#48, sweetcheeks- haven't you heard? the franklin mint is doing the series. for a measly $59.99, every six weeks the mint will ship you the entire set, britney's finest moments.
and i thought nothing would ever replace my set of star trek commemorative plates! *wipes tear*
WTF?? the PRO-lifers had a hand in this? it makes me WANT abort! and my kid is 20!
and why in the hell britney? an homage to motherhood? oh, yes, young brit is a fine role model and excellent mother. i'm less disturbed about the statue than i am the fact this is supposed to be that sad excuse of a human being (okay, the human part may be debatable). this thing serves what purpose? gag me with a fork. she totally gives hillbillies a bad name.
this is wrong on SO many levels.
easter egg. hee-hee!
110. Posted by Bad Ass on April 7, 2006 10:26 PM
The billionth man to have intricate knowledge of Britney Spears' anatomy. LOL
111. Posted by QOTD on April 7, 2006 10:35 PM
#30, Woo, Hoo, that's right a c-section does not make you less of a mother. Plently of woman give birth through their Vagina & are terrible mothers.
I'll tell ya, I am a mom & I sure as hell don't wanna see anybody giving birth... Ewww that statue is grotesque! I would hang the artist in the middle of town square in the same position... Gross!
112. Posted by frightenedandconfused on April 8, 2006 12:11 AM
She's just shown giving birth in the same position in which little Sean was conceived. Gives new meaning to "having a turtle-head poking out."
113. Posted by domino on April 8, 2006 02:44 AM
I know Brit's vag is sort of in yer face in that pic, but look again - no, stop crying - seriously, look again. It looks like KFed broked that bitch's ankles...
114. Posted by maiira on April 8, 2006 04:11 AM
First: AAAAAHHH!!!
Second: #86, that's creepy.
Third: ......AAAAHHH!!!
115. Posted by chiris on April 8, 2006 06:04 AM
Looks like she is taking a crap, not delivering a baby.
116. Posted by Jenny on April 8, 2006 10:08 AM
The sculpter must not have heard.. Britney had a C-SECTION! Not that anyone would want to see that carved in stone either...
117. Posted by LRonHubbaHubba on April 8, 2006 12:33 PM
This picture makes me want to drop out of the "motherhood club" forever. Maybe Jessica Simpson will adopt my three vaginally-delivered children.
118. Posted by SweeterSweeterBoyfriendStealer! on April 8, 2006 01:15 PM
#31? GOOD one!!! i totally agree, toys are fun :)
#94 and #115---- SOOO with you on that one!!! ugh, im shuddering that the thought, sheis sooo sooo awful!!!!
119. Posted by Miss Gulch on April 8, 2006 03:08 PM
Leave it to a 50-year-old guy with an apparently overactive and bizarrely disturbed sexual fantasy life to try to sell us on the idea that this is a legitimate piece of art, instead of a disgusting male fantasy of his that women give birth with their crotch up in the air like that, and on bearskin, no less. What a sick freak.
120. Posted by Dee on April 8, 2006 04:21 PM
that thing is actually a great form of birth control...one look at it and you wouldn't even dream of getting banged up....hell no
121. Posted by Shelley Bonnechance on April 8, 2006 05:12 PM
Oh...help.....that statue is just so....wrong.
122. Posted by Drunk Blogger on April 8, 2006 07:24 PM
Yeah, that's still just as disgusting. BTW, #122, this post was hilarious. Thanks for posting it.
Oh, no problem man, thanks, you too.
123. Posted by Miss Gulch on April 8, 2006 07:29 PM
#122 -- both of you: LOL!!!
124. Posted by krisdylee on April 9, 2006 12:52 AM
where's that crazy italian mother-fucker who smashed Michelangelo's "David" (on the foot) in Florence about 15-20 years ago???? we need him now....
125. Posted by krisdylee on April 9, 2006 12:54 AM
i feel like drunkblogger, cuz i kinda am after my friend's wedding this evening. td and js, true love...
126. Posted by krisdylee on April 9, 2006 12:55 AM
i love you guys.....
127. Posted by krisdylee on April 9, 2006 12:56 AM
i really really lo...blelbleeehargghablehahdrggg
sorry about tha man..
i gotta go pass out
128. Posted by junebug on April 9, 2006 03:39 AM
I wonder why abortion was the first thing I thought of when I saw this. ?
129. Posted by Domino on April 9, 2006 07:24 AM
aaaaaaaaaarrrghghhhh my eyes!
that statue is a disgrace.
130. Posted by chadbryden on April 9, 2006 09:10 AM
For some reason, Britney was accepted by a doctor to have a c-section EARLY. She purposely risked the health of her baby so that she wouldn't get stretch marks or have to endure a natural birth. What doctor would do that? Aside from being unethical, don't they make enough money to turn down such a horrid request?
131. Posted by Aaronmalamend on April 9, 2006 11:24 AM
I have a serious problem with the fact that there are artists who think that portraying a birthing by a hick-celebrity, which was most likely conceived accidentally, should or could ever be deemed as art. Anyways, why would the artist assume she was giving birth doggystyle, instead of in a hospital. Why name it after brittany spears? It doesn't look like her, if you see any recent photos of her, or any while she was pregnant, she did not exude any elegance or beauty whatsoever. This is just fucked... I am an educated person, and I enjoy art, but what the fuck is the museum thinking when they accept this into their gallery? I cannot find any answers to my questions.
132. Posted by SaSsY on April 10, 2006 05:58 AM
FUCK YOU SPEARS! YOU'VE DONE IT AGAIN...
SASSY OUT!
133. Posted by SaSsY on April 10, 2006 05:58 AM
FUCK YOU SPEARS! YOU'VE DONE IT AGAIN...
SASSY OUT!
134. Posted by ERLynx on April 10, 2006 02:23 PM
Yea I dont really understand why she is giving birth in a doggie style position. Is that a Kabballah thing? Did someone actually witness this? That would be hilarious, I want photos.
135. Posted by biatcho on April 10, 2006 04:47 PM
this is the main reason the government doesn't support the arts as much as they should
136. Posted by seaglass on April 10, 2006 04:51 PM
THIS was unnecessary.
137. Posted by volcanoesmeltme on April 10, 2006 07:04 PM
ok, ok, after some recuperation i can deal with looking at britney's vag, ass up and presenting itself to me like that with the crowning head of what is sure to be a semi-retarded blight on humanity in the future. but is anybody noting the star wars pigtail hair-do she's got going on? someone please explain THAT.
138. Posted by Trotter on April 11, 2006 01:56 AM
137 - While it appears to be Princess Lea's style, I believe it is merely the artist's rendition of a Daddy's Lil' Dumplin' Will Soon Be Ready For Pluckin' look that makes the Pro Lifers so warm and fuzzy...
139. Posted by SweeterSweeterBoyfriendStealer! on April 11, 2006 10:42 AM
#51 and 55 im with you on that!
140. Posted by ejameson on April 11, 2006 11:42 AM
SHE HAD A C-SECTION. This statue is false.
141. Posted by oshkoshb-goshdammgosh on April 11, 2006 05:32 PM
Brit, this isn't what we meant when we asked for more cowbell.
142. Posted by Teen_Christ666 on April 15, 2006 05:59 PM
Why does her ass look like a goat shitting out a watermelon?!!Thank god I am getting fixed no vagina should have to suffer.If our private parts are so sensitive what makes you think having something 10 times bigger than your hole was a good idea?!!She is a disgusting talentless piece of trailer trash and will be dancing her fat widening ass on a dingy nasty two dllar a night strip club with seven kids and no daddy in a trailer hoping jerry will give her a call in no time.I'm sorry vagina that you had to see this digrace.Monument to prolife or an anatomy study for pigfuckers?
143. Posted by Syndicate League on April 18, 2006 02:46 PM
I think that it's kind of erotic: Makes me wanna jerk off to it....
144. Posted by whatever on May 11, 2006 05:58 PM
Wait a second... that's not a baby - It's Justin Timberlake!!! How did he get in there?!
145. Posted by DaNiGuRl on May 15, 2006 02:19 AM
I really don't think she had a C-section suz she was scheduled to have one on the 18th of september but went into labor on the 14th!!! I remember watching FOX news and on the bottom of the screen it ran across that she went into labor...i remember the date cuz it was on my 21st birthday and i can remember thinking "that bitch had to steal my thunder!!!"
146. Posted by honkeycorn_x on May 30, 2006 08:50 PM
Okay so you all think its so gross? Considering.. if you had actually seen a vagina in something else than your computer porn, you'd know its not the most beautiful thing. And do you think she agreed, or asked for someone to make a statue of her naked giving birth? Probably not. Just because she's a celebrity doesn't mean she wants her personal life.. especially her GIVING BIRTH to her baby boy.. to be on display in a big city museum? Think about it.. how happy would you be? Sure it can be considered a celebration for the gift of life, and even so, shut your traps. You go give birth and let someone make a statue of you doing it.. see how pretty YOUR vagina is. Then lets hear you complain.
147. Posted by honkeycorn_x on May 30, 2006 08:52 PM
And also.. shes most likely more talented than most of you will ever be.