“Singer Barbra Streisand has been ordered to pay a six-figure sum to an amateur photographer whom she had sued for $10m (?5.5m) in a privacy dispute.”
What’s that, Barbra? You’re a whiny little bitch? The idea that this filthy rich celebrity decided to sue an amateur photographer for $10 million is somewhere along the lines of lunacy.
“But he took a picture of my multimillion dollar estate!”
Are you out of your mind? I don’t care what kind of problem you have with stalkers, suing a non celebrity/CEO for $10 million is just plain stupid. Is it possible that celebrities are so warped in their own little worlds that they don’t realize that a normal human being can’t pay $10 million? I hate celebrities who have no appreciation for what they have and what’s been given to them. They make 100x the average person’s salary and all they can do is bitch about how fans keep bothering them. And on occasion, their millions of dollars just aren’t enough so they have to go and sue some Joe Schmoe for $10 million more.
Read More [BBC News]
The latest buzz regarding Julia Roberts is that she’s supposedly ‘glowing with health on the beach’. Can somebody explain to me why every news article is referring to her supposed pregnancy with this weird expression? Why can’t they just say she looks pregnant? Are they afraid they might offend her by calling her fat? Dancing around the subject with strange terms that may or may not imply pregnancy only really serves to piss me off. I don’t care if she looks healthy. I don’t care if she’s glowing. All I want to know is whether or not she’s pregnant. And why do they all specify that she happens to be on the beach when they talk about her healthy glow? For some odd reason, the piss poor journalists abroad seem to associate healthy glows with pregnancy. Now I’m not really up to date on my pregnant lingo, but I always thought a ‘healthy glow’ meant sweaty. So basically, these articles are saying that Julia Roberts is pregnant because she was sweating on the beach. Fantastic.






















